阿根廷一家三级医疗中心预防缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作的能力。

Juan Antonio Pozo Putalivo MD, Martin Grecco MD, Guillermo Pablo Povedano MD, Mauricio De Sampaio MD, Sofia Caporale MD, Santajuliana Franco MD
{"title":"阿根廷一家三级医疗中心预防缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作的能力。","authors":"Juan Antonio Pozo Putalivo MD,&nbsp;Martin Grecco MD,&nbsp;Guillermo Pablo Povedano MD,&nbsp;Mauricio De Sampaio MD,&nbsp;Sofia Caporale MD,&nbsp;Santajuliana Franco MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with many individuals presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) due to underlying vascular risk factors (VRF). While these patients typically undergo routine evaluations for acute treatment, the prevention of these conditions is often underestimated. This study reports the prevalence of non-optimized VRF and estimates their degree of avoidability in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary care center following AIS/TIA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study enrolled patients older than 18 years who experienced AIS/TIA over a two-year period. Preventability was defined as the degree to which an acute cerebrovascular event could have been prevented if the VRF had been appropriately treated. Using the variables determined at the onset of AIS or TIA, we developed a 10-point scale to classify the degree of preventability (not preventable [score of 0], low preventability [score of 1–3], and high preventability [score of 4 or higher]). We further defined sub-scores based on the effectiveness of treatment of high blood pressure [HBP] (0-2 points), dyslipidemia [DLP] (0-2 points), atrial fibrillation [AF] (1 point), active smoking [AS] (1 point), obesity (1 point), previous coronary heart disease [CHD] (1 point), and previous AIS/TIA (2 points). Demographic factors, etiologies, and imaging findings were evaluated, tabulated independently, and subsequently correlated with clinical findings extracted from the available patient records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 395 patients (334 with AIS and 61 with TIA), 376 (95.19 %) exhibited some degree of preventability, whereas 19 (4.81 %) presented with a nonpreventable event. In total, 296 (74.94 %) presented a low preventable event, and 80 (20.25 %) presented a high preventable event. Applying the Chi-square test of independence to stroke etiology highlighted cardio-aortic embolism and large artery atherosclerosis as groups with a significantly higher burden of risk factors necessitating intervention, while patients with stroke of other etiologies had more adequate control of VRF. In terms of stroke severity, as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), patients with NIHSS scores &gt;5 were more likely to experience preventable events. According to the ABCD2 score, higher risk scores were significantly associated with a higher preventive factor burden; however, age, sex, vascular territory, and Canadian TIA scores were not related to the prevention of AIS/TIA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The high percentage of preventable events reflects the need to study other factors that may contribute to unhealthy lifestyles in this population. Potential reasons for poor health include high levels of stress, sleep deprivation, working conditions and an unhealthy diet. Further studies are required to better understand these phenomena.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventability of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack in a tertiary care center in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Juan Antonio Pozo Putalivo MD,&nbsp;Martin Grecco MD,&nbsp;Guillermo Pablo Povedano MD,&nbsp;Mauricio De Sampaio MD,&nbsp;Sofia Caporale MD,&nbsp;Santajuliana Franco MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with many individuals presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) due to underlying vascular risk factors (VRF). While these patients typically undergo routine evaluations for acute treatment, the prevention of these conditions is often underestimated. This study reports the prevalence of non-optimized VRF and estimates their degree of avoidability in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary care center following AIS/TIA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study enrolled patients older than 18 years who experienced AIS/TIA over a two-year period. Preventability was defined as the degree to which an acute cerebrovascular event could have been prevented if the VRF had been appropriately treated. Using the variables determined at the onset of AIS or TIA, we developed a 10-point scale to classify the degree of preventability (not preventable [score of 0], low preventability [score of 1–3], and high preventability [score of 4 or higher]). We further defined sub-scores based on the effectiveness of treatment of high blood pressure [HBP] (0-2 points), dyslipidemia [DLP] (0-2 points), atrial fibrillation [AF] (1 point), active smoking [AS] (1 point), obesity (1 point), previous coronary heart disease [CHD] (1 point), and previous AIS/TIA (2 points). Demographic factors, etiologies, and imaging findings were evaluated, tabulated independently, and subsequently correlated with clinical findings extracted from the available patient records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 395 patients (334 with AIS and 61 with TIA), 376 (95.19 %) exhibited some degree of preventability, whereas 19 (4.81 %) presented with a nonpreventable event. In total, 296 (74.94 %) presented a low preventable event, and 80 (20.25 %) presented a high preventable event. Applying the Chi-square test of independence to stroke etiology highlighted cardio-aortic embolism and large artery atherosclerosis as groups with a significantly higher burden of risk factors necessitating intervention, while patients with stroke of other etiologies had more adequate control of VRF. In terms of stroke severity, as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), patients with NIHSS scores &gt;5 were more likely to experience preventable events. According to the ABCD2 score, higher risk scores were significantly associated with a higher preventive factor burden; however, age, sex, vascular territory, and Canadian TIA scores were not related to the prevention of AIS/TIA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The high percentage of preventable events reflects the need to study other factors that may contribute to unhealthy lifestyles in this population. Potential reasons for poor health include high levels of stress, sleep deprivation, working conditions and an unhealthy diet. Further studies are required to better understand these phenomena.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"33 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 108040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724004841\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724004841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:心血管疾病仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因,许多人由于潜在的血管危险因素(VRF)而出现急性缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(AIS/TIA)。虽然这些患者通常会接受常规评估以进行急性治疗,但这些疾病的预防往往被低估。本研究报告了在一家三级医疗中心接受 AIS/TIA 治疗的一组患者中未优化 VRF 的发生率,并估算了其可避免程度:这项回顾性研究招募了两年内经历过AIS/TIA的18岁以上患者。可预防性的定义是,如果对 VRF 进行适当治疗,急性脑血管事件的可预防程度。利用 AIS 或 TIA 发病时确定的变量,我们制定了一个 10 分等级表来划分可预防性的程度(不可预防[0 分]、低可预防性[1-3 分]和高可预防性[4 分或更高])。我们根据高血压[HBP](0-2 分)、血脂异常[DLP](0-2 分)、心房颤动[AF](1 分)、主动吸烟[AS](1 分)、肥胖(1 分)、既往冠心病[CHD](1 分)和既往 AIS/TIA (2 分)的治疗效果进一步定义了子分数。对人口统计学因素、病因和影像学检查结果进行评估,独立制表,然后与从现有病历中提取的临床检查结果进行关联:在 395 名患者(334 名 AIS 患者和 61 名 TIA 患者)中,有 376 人(95.19%)表现出一定程度的可预防性,而有 19 人(4.81%)表现出不可预防性。总共有 296 人(74.94%)出现了低可预防性事件,80 人(20.25%)出现了高可预防性事件。对中风病因的独立性进行了卡方检验,结果表明,心主动脉栓塞和大动脉粥样硬化是需要干预的危险因素负担明显较高的组别,而其他病因的中风患者对 VRF 的控制更为充分。根据美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)确定的卒中严重程度,NIHSS 评分大于 5 分的患者更有可能发生可预防的事件。根据 ABCD2 评分,较高的风险评分与较高的预防因素负担显著相关;但年龄、性别、血管区域和加拿大 TIA 评分与 AIS/TIA 的预防无关:结论:可预防事件的高比例反映出有必要研究可能导致该人群不健康生活方式的其他因素。健康状况不佳的潜在原因包括高度紧张、睡眠不足、工作条件和不健康的饮食。要更好地了解这些现象,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preventability of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack in a tertiary care center in Argentina

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with many individuals presenting with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (AIS/TIA) due to underlying vascular risk factors (VRF). While these patients typically undergo routine evaluations for acute treatment, the prevention of these conditions is often underestimated. This study reports the prevalence of non-optimized VRF and estimates their degree of avoidability in a cohort of patients treated in a tertiary care center following AIS/TIA.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients older than 18 years who experienced AIS/TIA over a two-year period. Preventability was defined as the degree to which an acute cerebrovascular event could have been prevented if the VRF had been appropriately treated. Using the variables determined at the onset of AIS or TIA, we developed a 10-point scale to classify the degree of preventability (not preventable [score of 0], low preventability [score of 1–3], and high preventability [score of 4 or higher]). We further defined sub-scores based on the effectiveness of treatment of high blood pressure [HBP] (0-2 points), dyslipidemia [DLP] (0-2 points), atrial fibrillation [AF] (1 point), active smoking [AS] (1 point), obesity (1 point), previous coronary heart disease [CHD] (1 point), and previous AIS/TIA (2 points). Demographic factors, etiologies, and imaging findings were evaluated, tabulated independently, and subsequently correlated with clinical findings extracted from the available patient records.

Results

Of the 395 patients (334 with AIS and 61 with TIA), 376 (95.19 %) exhibited some degree of preventability, whereas 19 (4.81 %) presented with a nonpreventable event. In total, 296 (74.94 %) presented a low preventable event, and 80 (20.25 %) presented a high preventable event. Applying the Chi-square test of independence to stroke etiology highlighted cardio-aortic embolism and large artery atherosclerosis as groups with a significantly higher burden of risk factors necessitating intervention, while patients with stroke of other etiologies had more adequate control of VRF. In terms of stroke severity, as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), patients with NIHSS scores >5 were more likely to experience preventable events. According to the ABCD2 score, higher risk scores were significantly associated with a higher preventive factor burden; however, age, sex, vascular territory, and Canadian TIA scores were not related to the prevention of AIS/TIA.

Conclusions

The high percentage of preventable events reflects the need to study other factors that may contribute to unhealthy lifestyles in this population. Potential reasons for poor health include high levels of stress, sleep deprivation, working conditions and an unhealthy diet. Further studies are required to better understand these phenomena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Association between leisure-time physical activity and stroke in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A population-based study Aphasia profiles and trajectories in acute ischemic stroke: an observational study. Exergames for Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors: Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. Letter to the editor regarding "Hybrid clinical-radiomics model based on fully automatic segmentation for predicting the early expansion of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A multi-center study". Possible Misdiagnosis of Pregnancy-Associated Stroke in the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1