采用先进的/介入性疼痛疗法(如泵给式连续阿片类药物)对患者进行姑息性放射治疗。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Anticancer research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.21873/anticanres.17271
Carsten Nieder, Stine M Jensen, Solveig Nilsen, Ellinor C Haukland
{"title":"采用先进的/介入性疼痛疗法(如泵给式连续阿片类药物)对患者进行姑息性放射治疗。","authors":"Carsten Nieder, Stine M Jensen, Solveig Nilsen, Ellinor C Haukland","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The study aim was to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of palliative radiotherapy in patients receiving advanced/interventional pain therapy, such as epidural or spinal anesthesia or subcutaneous pump delivery of opioids. Endpoints such as pain relief, treatment in the last month of life and survival were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Different baseline parameters including but not limited to age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) were assessed. Outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was utilized to score pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 48 patients, 44 of whom completed radiotherapy as prescribed. Device malfunction was not observed. Overall, 31 patients (65%) had journal notes available allowing for evaluation of pain relief. Twenty-six of 31 experienced pain relief (54% in the intention-to-treat population of 48 study patients). Twelve patients (25%) stopped interventional pain therapy and were converted to transdermal or oral drugs. Median survival was 1.6 months. Forty-four percent had received radiotherapy during the last month of life. Sixty-four percent of patients with ECOG PS 3-4 had received radiotherapy during the last month of life, compared to 22% of those with ECOG PS <3, p=0.004.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy was feasible in this setting, but given the short median survival and high likelihood of treatment during the last month of life, patient selection and choice of fractionation regimen should be optimized. The record review identified several patients who experienced worthwhile pain relief, sometimes leading to conversion of pain therapy back to non-invasive oral or transdermal application.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"44 10","pages":"4419-4425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Radiation Treatment in Patients Managed With Advanced/Interventional Pain Therapy such as Pump-delivered Continuous Opioids.\",\"authors\":\"Carsten Nieder, Stine M Jensen, Solveig Nilsen, Ellinor C Haukland\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The study aim was to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of palliative radiotherapy in patients receiving advanced/interventional pain therapy, such as epidural or spinal anesthesia or subcutaneous pump delivery of opioids. Endpoints such as pain relief, treatment in the last month of life and survival were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Different baseline parameters including but not limited to age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) were assessed. Outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was utilized to score pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 48 patients, 44 of whom completed radiotherapy as prescribed. Device malfunction was not observed. Overall, 31 patients (65%) had journal notes available allowing for evaluation of pain relief. Twenty-six of 31 experienced pain relief (54% in the intention-to-treat population of 48 study patients). Twelve patients (25%) stopped interventional pain therapy and were converted to transdermal or oral drugs. Median survival was 1.6 months. Forty-four percent had received radiotherapy during the last month of life. Sixty-four percent of patients with ECOG PS 3-4 had received radiotherapy during the last month of life, compared to 22% of those with ECOG PS <3, p=0.004.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy was feasible in this setting, but given the short median survival and high likelihood of treatment during the last month of life, patient selection and choice of fractionation regimen should be optimized. The record review identified several patients who experienced worthwhile pain relief, sometimes leading to conversion of pain therapy back to non-invasive oral or transdermal application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"44 10\",\"pages\":\"4419-4425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17271\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:该研究旨在分析姑息放疗在接受晚期/介入性疼痛治疗(如硬膜外或脊髓麻醉或阿片类药物皮下泵给药)患者中的可行性和有效性。患者和方法:评估了不同的基线参数,包括但不限于年龄和东部合作肿瘤学组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现状态(ECOG PS)。结果摘自电子健康记录。采用埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)对疼痛强度进行评分:研究共纳入 48 名患者,其中 44 人按照医嘱完成了放疗。未发现设备故障。总体而言,31 名患者(65%)有日志记录,可以对疼痛缓解情况进行评估。31名患者中有26名疼痛缓解(在48名研究患者的意向治疗人群中占54%)。12名患者(25%)停止了介入止痛治疗,转为使用透皮或口服药物。中位生存期为 1.6 个月。44%的患者在生命的最后一个月接受了放疗。64%的ECOG PS 3-4患者在生命的最后一个月接受了放疗,而ECOG PS结论为3-4的患者只有22%接受了放疗:姑息放疗在这种情况下是可行的,但考虑到中位生存期较短以及在生命最后一个月接受治疗的可能性较高,应优化患者选择和分次治疗方案的选择。记录审查发现,有几名患者的疼痛得到了有效缓解,有时导致疼痛治疗转回非侵入性口服或透皮应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative Radiation Treatment in Patients Managed With Advanced/Interventional Pain Therapy such as Pump-delivered Continuous Opioids.

Background/aim: The study aim was to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of palliative radiotherapy in patients receiving advanced/interventional pain therapy, such as epidural or spinal anesthesia or subcutaneous pump delivery of opioids. Endpoints such as pain relief, treatment in the last month of life and survival were evaluated.

Patients and methods: Different baseline parameters including but not limited to age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) were assessed. Outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was utilized to score pain intensity.

Results: The study included 48 patients, 44 of whom completed radiotherapy as prescribed. Device malfunction was not observed. Overall, 31 patients (65%) had journal notes available allowing for evaluation of pain relief. Twenty-six of 31 experienced pain relief (54% in the intention-to-treat population of 48 study patients). Twelve patients (25%) stopped interventional pain therapy and were converted to transdermal or oral drugs. Median survival was 1.6 months. Forty-four percent had received radiotherapy during the last month of life. Sixty-four percent of patients with ECOG PS 3-4 had received radiotherapy during the last month of life, compared to 22% of those with ECOG PS <3, p=0.004.

Conclusion: Palliative radiotherapy was feasible in this setting, but given the short median survival and high likelihood of treatment during the last month of life, patient selection and choice of fractionation regimen should be optimized. The record review identified several patients who experienced worthwhile pain relief, sometimes leading to conversion of pain therapy back to non-invasive oral or transdermal application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
期刊最新文献
A Gene Expression Signature that Predicts Gastric Cancer Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitor Therapy. A Prospective Observational Study Analyzing the Diversity and Specific Composition of the Oral and Gut Microbiota in Lung Cancer Patients. Accuracy of Preoperative Magnet Resonance Imaging to Predict Pathologic T-Stage in Patients With Cervical Cancer. Association Between ABCC2 -24C>T and Nab-Paclitaxel-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Japanese Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Association of Plasma Nestin With Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1