盲人对带有可穿戴触觉装置的电子手杖原型的感知和满意度。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0317
Caio Henrique Marques Texeira, Ana Luiza Fontes de Azevedo Costa, Amanda Amorim Rodrigues, Vagner Rogério Dos Santos, Adriana Berezovsky
{"title":"盲人对带有可穿戴触觉装置的电子手杖原型的感知和满意度。","authors":"Caio Henrique Marques Texeira, Ana Luiza Fontes de Azevedo Costa, Amanda Amorim Rodrigues, Vagner Rogério Dos Santos, Adriana Berezovsky","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the perception and degree of satisfaction of blind individuals regarding an electronic cane prototype with a wearable haptic interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two scenarios with different obstacles were created to conduct tests with the canes (the user's cane and the prototype one). The perception and satisfaction of participants regarding the electronic cane were assessed using a questionnaire, the number of collisions during the tests, and the time each individual took to complete the course in each scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten blind individuals who used the white cane participated in this study. Eight were males, and two were females. Their age ranged from 23 to 43 (average 32.3 ± 7.13 years and median 32 years). There was a tendency for fewer collisions with ground obstacles when the electronic cane was used than when the white cane was used. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of collisions and the course completion time in each scenario with either canes tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the perception and satisfaction of individuals regarding the prototype used were positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception and satisfaction of blind individuals regarding an electronic cane prototype with a wearable haptic device.\",\"authors\":\"Caio Henrique Marques Texeira, Ana Luiza Fontes de Azevedo Costa, Amanda Amorim Rodrigues, Vagner Rogério Dos Santos, Adriana Berezovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the perception and degree of satisfaction of blind individuals regarding an electronic cane prototype with a wearable haptic interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two scenarios with different obstacles were created to conduct tests with the canes (the user's cane and the prototype one). The perception and satisfaction of participants regarding the electronic cane were assessed using a questionnaire, the number of collisions during the tests, and the time each individual took to complete the course in each scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten blind individuals who used the white cane participated in this study. Eight were males, and two were females. Their age ranged from 23 to 43 (average 32.3 ± 7.13 years and median 32 years). There was a tendency for fewer collisions with ground obstacles when the electronic cane was used than when the white cane was used. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of collisions and the course completion time in each scenario with either canes tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the perception and satisfaction of individuals regarding the prototype used were positive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估盲人对带有可穿戴触觉界面的电子手杖原型的感知和满意程度:方法:为了对手杖(用户的手杖和原型手杖)进行测试,研究人员创建了两个具有不同障碍的场景。结果:10 位使用白手杖的盲人在测试中遇到了不同的障碍物:十名使用白色手杖的盲人参加了这项研究。结果:10 名使用白手杖的盲人参加了此次研究,其中 8 人为男性,2 人为女性。他们的年龄从 23 岁到 43 岁不等(平均 32.3 ± 7.13 岁,中位数 32 岁)。与使用白色手杖相比,使用电子手杖时与地面障碍物发生碰撞的次数更少。然而,在每个测试场景中,两种手杖的碰撞次数和完成路线时间在统计学上没有显著差异:总的来说,个人对所使用原型的感知和满意度都是积极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception and satisfaction of blind individuals regarding an electronic cane prototype with a wearable haptic device.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the perception and degree of satisfaction of blind individuals regarding an electronic cane prototype with a wearable haptic interface.

Methods: Two scenarios with different obstacles were created to conduct tests with the canes (the user's cane and the prototype one). The perception and satisfaction of participants regarding the electronic cane were assessed using a questionnaire, the number of collisions during the tests, and the time each individual took to complete the course in each scenario.

Results: Ten blind individuals who used the white cane participated in this study. Eight were males, and two were females. Their age ranged from 23 to 43 (average 32.3 ± 7.13 years and median 32 years). There was a tendency for fewer collisions with ground obstacles when the electronic cane was used than when the white cane was used. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the number of collisions and the course completion time in each scenario with either canes tested.

Conclusion: Overall, the perception and satisfaction of individuals regarding the prototype used were positive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
期刊最新文献
Early visual intervention, visual function analysis, and grating visual acuity outcomes in children with congenital Zika syndrome. Prevalence of myopic eyes in private practice and public care services in Brazil: 11 years of retrospective analysis. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of laser correction with a mechanical and laser microkeratome for myopia. A novel predictor of persistent ocular hypotony after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: The initial intraocular pressure difference between the eye with RRD and the fellow eye. Comparison of the refractive prediction errors of artificial intelligence formula with 3 conventional formulas and 11 combination methods in cataract surgery on eyes with short axial length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1