{"title":"关于 \"阴道修复术和阴道修复术联合应用 GnRHa 治疗剖宫产瘢痕缺损的结果：随机临床试验\"。","authors":"Junfei Li MD, Dan Liao MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regarding “Outcomes of Vaginal Repair and Vaginal Repair Combined With GnRHa Administration in the Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial”\",\"authors\":\"Junfei Li MD, Dan Liao MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.08.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024004230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465024004230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
首先，本研究[1]的表 2 比较了 VR 前和 VR 后月经、月经周期和剩余肌肉层厚度（TRM）的差异。这些测量是在两个不同的时间点对相同的指标进行的，这表明适当的统计分析应采用配对样本 t 检验[2]，而不是方差分析。配对样本 t 检验是专门设计来考虑干预前后对同一受试者进行测量这一事实的，从而控制受试者内部的变异性，并对治疗引起的变化进行更准确的评估。其次，该研究[1]表 4 中的描述并不恰当。例如，表 4 将持续性 CSD 的几率比（OR）描述为 0.365，95% 置信区间（CI）为（-1.933，-0.083），这显然是不正确的，因为 OR 值不在 95% CI 范围内，表明存在统计误差。同样，最佳愈合的 OR 值为 3.254，95% CI 为（0.210，2.150），OR 值同样不在 95% CI 范围内。表 4 中的所有参数都存在这种误差，包括 TRM ≥ 5.39 mm 和月经 ≤ 7 天。因此，建议对数据进行彻底审查，并进行适当的统计分析，以获得准确的结论。
Regarding “Outcomes of Vaginal Repair and Vaginal Repair Combined With GnRHa Administration in the Treatment of Cesarean Section Scar Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial”
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
