宫颈癌治疗后的生活质量:宫颈癌根治术与放疗和化疗的比较

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/jso.27911
Alyne O Tokarski, Rafaella S Bernardelli, Julia R Bruscato, Claudio R Lucena, Jose C Linhares, Audrey T Tsunoda
{"title":"宫颈癌治疗后的生活质量:宫颈癌根治术与放疗和化疗的比较","authors":"Alyne O Tokarski, Rafaella S Bernardelli, Julia R Bruscato, Claudio R Lucena, Jose C Linhares, Audrey T Tsunoda","doi":"10.1002/jso.27911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in women with cervical cancer is crucial due to the profound changes they undergo during and after treatment. Often, the significance of sexual factors is underestimated, likely due to societal taboos surrounding such discussions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the long-term QoL outcomes, particularly focusing on sexuality, among three therapeutic approaches for cervical cancer: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy; isolated hysterectomy; and hysterectomy combined with radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted from November 2022 to July 2023, this cross-sectional study involved 131 cervical cancer patients. Their QoL was assessed using the MDASI, FACIT-Cx, and risk factor questionnaires. Results were compared across the three treatment groups, revealing notable differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing chemo/radio/brachytherapy showed significantly lower QoL scores compared to those undergoing isolated hysterectomy. This was evident in reduced scores across FACIT-Cx subscales for physical well-being, specific concerns, and FACIT-total (p < 0.05). The MDASI results similarly indicated greater symptoms and interference in daily activities for the chemo/radio/brachytherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, isolated hysterectomy, demonstrated superior QoL outcomes compared to chemo/radio/brachytherapy. Furthermore, the study underscored the importance of addressing sexual concerns in QoL assessments of cervical cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for comprehensive care to enhance overall well-being posttreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life Post Cervical Cancer Treatment: A Comparison Between Radical Surgery Approach and Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Alyne O Tokarski, Rafaella S Bernardelli, Julia R Bruscato, Claudio R Lucena, Jose C Linhares, Audrey T Tsunoda\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in women with cervical cancer is crucial due to the profound changes they undergo during and after treatment. Often, the significance of sexual factors is underestimated, likely due to societal taboos surrounding such discussions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the long-term QoL outcomes, particularly focusing on sexuality, among three therapeutic approaches for cervical cancer: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy; isolated hysterectomy; and hysterectomy combined with radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted from November 2022 to July 2023, this cross-sectional study involved 131 cervical cancer patients. Their QoL was assessed using the MDASI, FACIT-Cx, and risk factor questionnaires. Results were compared across the three treatment groups, revealing notable differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients undergoing chemo/radio/brachytherapy showed significantly lower QoL scores compared to those undergoing isolated hysterectomy. This was evident in reduced scores across FACIT-Cx subscales for physical well-being, specific concerns, and FACIT-total (p < 0.05). The MDASI results similarly indicated greater symptoms and interference in daily activities for the chemo/radio/brachytherapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, isolated hysterectomy, demonstrated superior QoL outcomes compared to chemo/radio/brachytherapy. Furthermore, the study underscored the importance of addressing sexual concerns in QoL assessments of cervical cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for comprehensive care to enhance overall well-being posttreatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介由于宫颈癌患者在治疗期间和治疗后经历了深刻的变化,因此对她们的生活质量(QoL)进行评估至关重要。通常情况下,性因素的重要性被低估,这可能是由于围绕此类讨论的社会禁忌所致:本研究旨在确定宫颈癌三种治疗方法(化疗、放疗和近距离放疗;孤立的子宫切除术;子宫切除术联合放疗)的长期QoL结果,尤其关注性生活:这项横断面研究于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 7 月进行,涉及 131 名宫颈癌患者。使用 MDASI、FACIT-Cx 和风险因素问卷对他们的 QoL 进行了评估。对三个治疗组的结果进行了比较,发现了明显的差异:结果:接受化疗/放疗/近距离放疗的患者的 QoL 得分明显低于接受单独子宫切除术的患者。这表现在 FACIT-Cx 分量表中身体健康、特定关注和 FACIT 总分的降低(p 结论:化疗/放疗/近距离放射治疗患者的 QoL 得分明显低于孤立子宫切除术患者:总之,与化疗/放疗/近距离放射治疗相比,孤立子宫切除术的 QoL 效果更佳。此外,该研究还强调了在宫颈癌幸存者的 QoL 评估中解决性问题的重要性,并强调需要提供全面的护理以提高治疗后的整体健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of Life Post Cervical Cancer Treatment: A Comparison Between Radical Surgery Approach and Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy.

Introduction: The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in women with cervical cancer is crucial due to the profound changes they undergo during and after treatment. Often, the significance of sexual factors is underestimated, likely due to societal taboos surrounding such discussions.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the long-term QoL outcomes, particularly focusing on sexuality, among three therapeutic approaches for cervical cancer: chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy; isolated hysterectomy; and hysterectomy combined with radiotherapy.

Methods: Conducted from November 2022 to July 2023, this cross-sectional study involved 131 cervical cancer patients. Their QoL was assessed using the MDASI, FACIT-Cx, and risk factor questionnaires. Results were compared across the three treatment groups, revealing notable differences.

Results: Patients undergoing chemo/radio/brachytherapy showed significantly lower QoL scores compared to those undergoing isolated hysterectomy. This was evident in reduced scores across FACIT-Cx subscales for physical well-being, specific concerns, and FACIT-total (p < 0.05). The MDASI results similarly indicated greater symptoms and interference in daily activities for the chemo/radio/brachytherapy group.

Conclusion: In conclusion, isolated hysterectomy, demonstrated superior QoL outcomes compared to chemo/radio/brachytherapy. Furthermore, the study underscored the importance of addressing sexual concerns in QoL assessments of cervical cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for comprehensive care to enhance overall well-being posttreatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Intraoperative Anesthesiology Provider Handovers on Postoperative Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery. Comment On: "Factors Influencing Prophylactic Surgical Intervention in Women With Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer". Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1