脓毒症和脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血中的肝素治疗:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0
Takaaki Totoki, Hiroyuki Koami, Yuto Makino, Takeshi Wada, Takashi Ito, Kazuma Yamakawa, Toshiaki Iba
{"title":"脓毒症和脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血中的肝素治疗:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Takaaki Totoki, Hiroyuki Koami, Yuto Makino, Takeshi Wada, Takashi Ito, Kazuma Yamakawa, Toshiaki Iba","doi":"10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).</p>","PeriodicalId":22982,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heparin therapy in sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Takaaki Totoki, Hiroyuki Koami, Yuto Makino, Takeshi Wada, Takashi Ito, Kazuma Yamakawa, Toshiaki Iba\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-024-00653-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:败血症是一种危及生命的疾病,每年影响 4900 万人。由于重症监护中的高死亡率,治疗败血症相关凝血病是一项重大挑战。最近的报告表明,在败血症和冠状病毒病病例中使用肝素可能会为患者带来潜在的生存益处。然而,目前还没有确凿证据支持将肝素用于败血症。因此,本研究旨在评估肝素对败血症患者的疗效:方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。检索范围包括截至 2023 年 1 月的 MEDLINE、Cochrane 和日本数据库。纳入标准包括成人脓毒症患者接受肝素治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用RoB2评估偏倚风险,数据提取包括28天死亡率和出血并发症:在 1733 篇初始文章中,只有三项研究符合纳入标准。纳入 426 例患者的分析结果显示,肝素组和对照组的 28 天死亡率和住院死亡率无显著差异(风险比 [RR] = 0.86,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.60-1.24)。对脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)患者(n = 109)进行的亚组分析也未显示死亡率显著降低(RR = 0.84,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.51-1.38)。异质性为零,未发现发表偏倚。此外,出血并发症也存在显著差异(RR = 0.49,95% CI:0.24-0.99,P = 0.047):这项荟萃分析并未证明肝素给脓毒症和脓毒症相关 DIC 患者带来生存益处。有必要进一步研究肝素的潜在益处。此外,分析结果显示,使用肝素不会增加出血风险;相反,出血风险显著降低:本综述已在 PROSPERO 预先注册(注册号:CRD42023385091)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heparin therapy in sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.

Results: Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.

Trial registration: This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis Journal
Thrombosis Journal Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Journal is an open-access journal that publishes original articles on aspects of clinical and basic research, new methodology, case reports and reviews in the areas of thrombosis. Topics of particular interest include the diagnosis of arterial and venous thrombosis, new antithrombotic treatments, new developments in the understanding, diagnosis and treatments of atherosclerotic vessel disease, relations between haemostasis and vascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, immunology and obesity.
期刊最新文献
A novel role for protein disulfide isomerase ERp18 in venous thrombosis. Association between red cell distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study. Editorial expression of concern: Lipoxin A4 analogue, BML-111, reduces platelet activation and protects from thrombosis. Lupus anticoagulant associated with low grade B-cell lymphoma and IgM paraproteinaemia with lupus cofactor phenomenon on DRVVT and SCT assays - a possible novel association. Identification of two point mutations associated with inherited antithrombin deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1