Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez
{"title":"在治疗长间隙食道闭锁患者时,我们利用原生食道进行修复的经验,如 Foker 和 Gazi 方法。","authors":"Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez","doi":"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49014,"journal":{"name":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","volume":"86 3","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our experience in repairs using the native esophagus such as the Foker and Gazi methods in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.\",\"authors\":\"Cem Kaya, Alparslan Kapisiz, Sibel Eryilmaz, Zafer Turkyilmaz, Ramazan Karabulut, Leyla Turker, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu, Ebru Ergenekon, Canan Turkyilmaz, Kaan Sonmez\",\"doi\":\"10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"479-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagoya Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.86.3.479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Our experience in repairs using the native esophagus such as the Foker and Gazi methods in the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.
This study aimed to share our experience with infants with repaired long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) using the native esophagus and Foker and Gazi methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with LGEA (six with pure esophageal atresia [EA], and four with distal trachea-esophageal fistula [TEF] + EA). The mean length between the esophageal pouches was 5.9 cm (4-9 cm). Five Foker methods, three Gazi methods, and two delayed primary repairs after a daily bougie were performed an average of 19.3 days after the first surgery and 26.4 days after the final esophageal anastomosis. For the Foker technique, it was 36.1 days. Their first oral intake was 10.2 days, and their transition to full enteral food was 26.2 days. An esophageal leak was detected in six patients. Fundoplication and dilatations were performed for three and four patients, respectively. For good results, LGEA patients should be operated on at least under the supervision of an experienced surgeon in specialized centers, and the team should be familiar with the techniques for using the native esophagus.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes original papers in the areas of medical science and its related fields. Reviews, symposium reports, short communications, notes, case reports, hypothesis papers, medical image at a glance, video and announcements are also accepted.
Manuscripts should be in English. It is recommended that an English check of the manuscript by a competent and knowledgeable native speaker be completed before submission.