评估胸腔内血管修复术治疗因灌注不良而并发的 B 型主动脉夹层。

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-25 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036
Hiroaki Kato, Noriyuki Kato, Takafumi Ouchi, Takatoshi Higashigawa, Hisato Ito, Ken Nakajima, Shuji Chino, Toshiya Tokui, Toru Mizumoto, Kensuke Oue, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma
{"title":"评估胸腔内血管修复术治疗因灌注不良而并发的 B 型主动脉夹层。","authors":"Hiroaki Kato, Noriyuki Kato, Takafumi Ouchi, Takatoshi Higashigawa, Hisato Ito, Ken Nakajima, Shuji Chino, Toshiya Tokui, Toru Mizumoto, Kensuke Oue, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aims to investigate the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD complicated by malperfusion from June 1998 to June 2022 in four institutions. In addition to the common outcomes, including short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity, the preservation of each organ was investigated. <b>Results:</b> A total of 23 patients were included in this analysis. The 30-day mortality was 4% (1/23) of the patients. The overall survival rate was 87% at 1 year. The preservation rate of each organ was 33% (4/12) for the visceral organs, 85% (17/20) for the kidneys, and 100% (18/18) for the legs. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in the preservation rate between the viscera and the other organs (<i>P</i> = 0.018 vs. kidneys, <i>P</i> = 0.0025 vs. legs). It was shown that the survival rate of patients with visceral malperfusion was significantly lower than that of patients with non-visceral malperfusion (<i>P</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusion:</b> In terms of mortality, TEVAR showed satisfactory results. The preservation of visceral organs was still challenging even with TEVAR and adjunctive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"17 3","pages":"248-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroaki Kato, Noriyuki Kato, Takafumi Ouchi, Takatoshi Higashigawa, Hisato Ito, Ken Nakajima, Shuji Chino, Toshiya Tokui, Toru Mizumoto, Kensuke Oue, Yasutaka Ichikawa, Hajime Sakuma\",\"doi\":\"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aims to investigate the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD complicated by malperfusion from June 1998 to June 2022 in four institutions. In addition to the common outcomes, including short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity, the preservation of each organ was investigated. <b>Results:</b> A total of 23 patients were included in this analysis. The 30-day mortality was 4% (1/23) of the patients. The overall survival rate was 87% at 1 year. The preservation rate of each organ was 33% (4/12) for the visceral organs, 85% (17/20) for the kidneys, and 100% (18/18) for the legs. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in the preservation rate between the viscera and the other organs (<i>P</i> = 0.018 vs. kidneys, <i>P</i> = 0.0025 vs. legs). It was shown that the survival rate of patients with visceral malperfusion was significantly lower than that of patients with non-visceral malperfusion (<i>P</i> = 0.006). <b>Conclusion:</b> In terms of mortality, TEVAR showed satisfactory results. The preservation of visceral organs was still challenging even with TEVAR and adjunctive measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"248-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)对并发灌注不良的 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的疗效。研究方法这项回顾性研究纳入了 1998 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在四家医疗机构接受 TEVAR 治疗并发有灌注不良的 TBAD 的患者。除了中短期死亡率和发病率等常见结果外,还调查了各器官的保存情况。研究结果共有 23 名患者被纳入本次分析。患者的 30 天死亡率为 4%(1/23)。1年后的总存活率为87%。内脏器官的保存率为 33%(4/12),肾脏为 85%(17/20),腿部为 100% (18/18)。费舍尔精确检验显示,内脏器官和其他器官的保存率存在显著差异(P = 0.018 vs. 肾脏,P = 0.0025 vs. 腿部)。结果显示,内脏灌注不良患者的存活率明显低于非内脏灌注不良患者(P = 0.006)。结论:就死亡率而言,TEVAR 的效果令人满意。即使采取了 TEVAR 和辅助措施,内脏器官的保存仍是一项挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD complicated by malperfusion from June 1998 to June 2022 in four institutions. In addition to the common outcomes, including short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity, the preservation of each organ was investigated. Results: A total of 23 patients were included in this analysis. The 30-day mortality was 4% (1/23) of the patients. The overall survival rate was 87% at 1 year. The preservation rate of each organ was 33% (4/12) for the visceral organs, 85% (17/20) for the kidneys, and 100% (18/18) for the legs. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in the preservation rate between the viscera and the other organs (P = 0.018 vs. kidneys, P = 0.0025 vs. legs). It was shown that the survival rate of patients with visceral malperfusion was significantly lower than that of patients with non-visceral malperfusion (P = 0.006). Conclusion: In terms of mortality, TEVAR showed satisfactory results. The preservation of visceral organs was still challenging even with TEVAR and adjunctive measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A Case of Acute Aortic Occlusion Occurring in Association with COVID-19 Infection and Ulcerative Colitis. A Case of Infected Abdominal Aortic Graft with Pancreatic Fistula: Successful Treatment through a Staged Approach with Percutaneous Catheter Drainage and Partial Graft Excision. A Case of Transapical Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm with a Complicated Access Route. Collapse and Occlusion of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent in the Right Common Iliac Arteries Due to External Stress. Coronary-Pulmonary Artery Fistula Provides Collateral Flow to an Occluded Left Anterior Descending Artery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1