Ana Paula Forte Camarneiro, Magda Sofia Roberto, João Manuel Rosado de Miranda Justo
{"title":"用心理、临床和社会人口因素解释产妇产前依恋:一项路径分析研究。","authors":"Ana Paula Forte Camarneiro, Magda Sofia Roberto, João Manuel Rosado de Miranda Justo","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06836-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal attachment is a fundamental concept relative to human transition to parenthood and may be influenced by several factors. The aim of this study is to find the best model to explain maternal antenatal attachment based on the interaction among sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women (N = 407) were interviewed during the second trimester of pregnancy while waiting for medical consultations. A sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychometric protocol was used.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>path analysis.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>psychopathological symptomatology, depression, anxiety, stress, occupational stress, attitudes about pregnancy and motherhood, coping styles, marital satisfaction, sociodemographic, and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Dependent variables: </strong>maternal antenatal attachment in its several dimensions; quality of attachment (QA), intensity of preoccupation (IP), and global attachment (GA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 37% of maternal antenatal QA. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 26% of maternal antenatal IP. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 34% of the statistical variance of maternal antenatal GA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factors like emotional states (depression and anxiety), attitudes towards pregnancy and motherhood, marital satisfaction, and a sociodemographic variable (age) contribute significantly for the explanation of maternal antenatal attachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining maternal antenatal attachment by psychological, clinical and sociodemographic factors: a path analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Forte Camarneiro, Magda Sofia Roberto, João Manuel Rosado de Miranda Justo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-024-06836-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal attachment is a fundamental concept relative to human transition to parenthood and may be influenced by several factors. The aim of this study is to find the best model to explain maternal antenatal attachment based on the interaction among sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women (N = 407) were interviewed during the second trimester of pregnancy while waiting for medical consultations. A sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychometric protocol was used.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>path analysis.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>psychopathological symptomatology, depression, anxiety, stress, occupational stress, attitudes about pregnancy and motherhood, coping styles, marital satisfaction, sociodemographic, and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Dependent variables: </strong>maternal antenatal attachment in its several dimensions; quality of attachment (QA), intensity of preoccupation (IP), and global attachment (GA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 37% of maternal antenatal QA. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 26% of maternal antenatal IP. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 34% of the statistical variance of maternal antenatal GA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Factors like emotional states (depression and anxiety), attitudes towards pregnancy and motherhood, marital satisfaction, and a sociodemographic variable (age) contribute significantly for the explanation of maternal antenatal attachment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06836-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06836-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:产前依恋是人类向为人父母过渡的一个基本概念,可能受到多种因素的影响。本研究的目的是根据社会人口、临床和心理变量之间的相互作用,找到解释产妇产前依恋的最佳模型:方法:在妊娠后三个月的候诊期间,对孕妇(N = 407)进行访谈。统计分析:路径分析。自变量:精神病理症状、抑郁、焦虑、压力、职业压力、对怀孕和做母亲的态度、应对方式、婚姻满意度、社会人口学和临床变量。因变量:产妇产前依恋的几个维度;依恋质量(QA)、先入为主强度(IP)和整体依恋(GA):抑郁、焦虑、态度和婚姻满意度解释了产妇产前依恋质量的 37%。年龄、抑郁、焦虑、态度和婚姻满意度解释了产妇产前 IP 的 26%。年龄、抑郁、焦虑、态度和婚姻满意度可解释 34% 的产妇产前 GA 统计变异:结论:情绪状态(抑郁和焦虑)、对怀孕和做母亲的态度、婚姻满意度和社会人口变量(年龄)等因素对解释产妇产前依恋有重要作用。
Explaining maternal antenatal attachment by psychological, clinical and sociodemographic factors: a path analysis study.
Background: Antenatal attachment is a fundamental concept relative to human transition to parenthood and may be influenced by several factors. The aim of this study is to find the best model to explain maternal antenatal attachment based on the interaction among sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables.
Methods: Pregnant women (N = 407) were interviewed during the second trimester of pregnancy while waiting for medical consultations. A sociodemographic, obstetric, and psychometric protocol was used.
Statistical analyses: path analysis.
Independent variables: psychopathological symptomatology, depression, anxiety, stress, occupational stress, attitudes about pregnancy and motherhood, coping styles, marital satisfaction, sociodemographic, and clinical variables.
Dependent variables: maternal antenatal attachment in its several dimensions; quality of attachment (QA), intensity of preoccupation (IP), and global attachment (GA).
Results: Depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 37% of maternal antenatal QA. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 26% of maternal antenatal IP. Age, depression, anxiety, attitudes, and marital satisfaction explained 34% of the statistical variance of maternal antenatal GA.
Conclusions: Factors like emotional states (depression and anxiety), attitudes towards pregnancy and motherhood, marital satisfaction, and a sociodemographic variable (age) contribute significantly for the explanation of maternal antenatal attachment.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.