不对称原发性膀胱输尿管反流:最佳手术策略是什么?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.011
Beatrice Montanaro, Nathalie Botto, Aline Broch, Nicolas Vinit, Thomas Blanc, Henri Lottmann
{"title":"不对称原发性膀胱输尿管反流:最佳手术策略是什么?","authors":"Beatrice Montanaro, Nathalie Botto, Aline Broch, Nicolas Vinit, Thomas Blanc, Henri Lottmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No report has been published regarding the recommended surgical treatment in patients presenting with symptomatic primary asymmetrical vesicoureteral reflux (VUR): high grade on one side and low grade on the contralateral side. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of combined Lich-Gregoir extravesical reimplantation and subureteric Deflux® injection, of high grade and low grade VUR respectively. Non-inferiority to bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation was investigated in terms of surgical complications, number of post-operative fUTIs and need for re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A monocentric retrospective study was undertaken of all consecutive children with primary asymmetrical VUR on MCUG treated over an 18-year period (2004-2022). Surgery was indicated following an episode of febrile urinary tract infection despite appropriate non-operative management. Demographic and clinical such as length of hospital stay for pain management, use of urinary Foley catheter and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 children met the study criteria: 40 patients underwent bilateral cross-trigonal re-implantation (Group 1) and 40 patients the combined Lich-Gregoir extra vesical reimplantation and Deflux® sub ureteric injection (Group 2). Complication and success rates were comparable in the two groups. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for Group 2, with 50 % of patients who were discharged on day 1. Moreover, the data showed a significant lesser need in number and length of bladder catheter and ureteral stents in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The technique proposed overcome the inconveniences of the other procedures that are commonly used in bilateral RVU: difficulty in retrograde catheterization or ureteroscopy after bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation, the risk of transient bladder dysfunction after bilateral extravesical reimplantation and the low rate of success for high grade reflux of the sub ureteric Deflux® injection. The main limitation of the study lies in its retrospective nature and in the relatively short median follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined Lich-Gregoir extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation and sub-ureteric Deflux® injection for the treatment of primary asymmetrical VUR is an effective alternative to the gold standard cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation. Moreover, the position of the ureteric orifice is not modified in the eventuality of endourological procedures into adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetrical primary vesicoureteral reflux: Which is the best surgical strategy?\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Montanaro, Nathalie Botto, Aline Broch, Nicolas Vinit, Thomas Blanc, Henri Lottmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No report has been published regarding the recommended surgical treatment in patients presenting with symptomatic primary asymmetrical vesicoureteral reflux (VUR): high grade on one side and low grade on the contralateral side. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of combined Lich-Gregoir extravesical reimplantation and subureteric Deflux® injection, of high grade and low grade VUR respectively. Non-inferiority to bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation was investigated in terms of surgical complications, number of post-operative fUTIs and need for re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A monocentric retrospective study was undertaken of all consecutive children with primary asymmetrical VUR on MCUG treated over an 18-year period (2004-2022). Surgery was indicated following an episode of febrile urinary tract infection despite appropriate non-operative management. Demographic and clinical such as length of hospital stay for pain management, use of urinary Foley catheter and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 children met the study criteria: 40 patients underwent bilateral cross-trigonal re-implantation (Group 1) and 40 patients the combined Lich-Gregoir extra vesical reimplantation and Deflux® sub ureteric injection (Group 2). Complication and success rates were comparable in the two groups. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for Group 2, with 50 % of patients who were discharged on day 1. Moreover, the data showed a significant lesser need in number and length of bladder catheter and ureteral stents in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The technique proposed overcome the inconveniences of the other procedures that are commonly used in bilateral RVU: difficulty in retrograde catheterization or ureteroscopy after bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation, the risk of transient bladder dysfunction after bilateral extravesical reimplantation and the low rate of success for high grade reflux of the sub ureteric Deflux® injection. The main limitation of the study lies in its retrospective nature and in the relatively short median follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined Lich-Gregoir extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation and sub-ureteric Deflux® injection for the treatment of primary asymmetrical VUR is an effective alternative to the gold standard cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation. Moreover, the position of the ureteric orifice is not modified in the eventuality of endourological procedures into adulthood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对于有症状的原发性不对称膀胱输尿管反流(VUR):一侧为高位,对侧为低位的患者,建议采用何种手术治疗方法,目前还没有相关报道。本研究旨在评估联合 Lich-Gregoir 膀胱外再植术和输尿管下 Deflux® 注射术分别治疗高位和低位 VUR 的有效性和结果。在手术并发症、术后膀胱尿道炎次数和再次介入治疗的需要方面,研究了双侧交叉膀胱再植术的非劣效性:对 18 年间(2004-2022 年)接受 MCUG 治疗的所有原发性不对称 VUR 患儿进行了单中心回顾性研究。尽管采用了适当的非手术疗法,但发热性尿路感染仍是手术的指征。研究分析了人口统计学和临床情况,如因疼痛治疗而住院的时间、福来导尿管的使用和并发症:共有 80 名儿童符合研究标准:结果:共有 80 名儿童符合研究标准:40 名患者接受了双侧交叉三叉神经再植术(第 1 组),40 名患者接受了 Lich-Gregoir 膀胱外再植术和 Deflux® 输尿管下注射联合术(第 2 组)。两组的并发症发生率和成功率相当。第 2 组的中位住院时间明显更短,50% 的患者可在第 1 天出院。此外,数据还显示,第 2 组患者所需的膀胱导尿管和输尿管支架的数量和长度都明显减少:所提出的技术克服了双侧 RVU 常用的其他手术的不便之处:双侧跨三叉再植术后逆行导尿或输尿管镜检查的困难、双侧膀胱外再植术后一过性膀胱功能障碍的风险以及输尿管下 Deflux® 注射液高度反流的低成功率。该研究的主要局限性在于其回顾性和相对较短的中位随访时间:结论:Lich-Gregoir膀胱外输尿管再植术和输尿管下 Deflux® 注射联合治疗原发性不对称 VUR 是金标准跨三叉输尿管再植术的有效替代方案。此外,输尿管口的位置不会因成年后可能进行的输尿管内手术而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymmetrical primary vesicoureteral reflux: Which is the best surgical strategy?

Introduction: No report has been published regarding the recommended surgical treatment in patients presenting with symptomatic primary asymmetrical vesicoureteral reflux (VUR): high grade on one side and low grade on the contralateral side. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of combined Lich-Gregoir extravesical reimplantation and subureteric Deflux® injection, of high grade and low grade VUR respectively. Non-inferiority to bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation was investigated in terms of surgical complications, number of post-operative fUTIs and need for re-intervention.

Patients and methods: A monocentric retrospective study was undertaken of all consecutive children with primary asymmetrical VUR on MCUG treated over an 18-year period (2004-2022). Surgery was indicated following an episode of febrile urinary tract infection despite appropriate non-operative management. Demographic and clinical such as length of hospital stay for pain management, use of urinary Foley catheter and complications were analyzed.

Results: A total of 80 children met the study criteria: 40 patients underwent bilateral cross-trigonal re-implantation (Group 1) and 40 patients the combined Lich-Gregoir extra vesical reimplantation and Deflux® sub ureteric injection (Group 2). Complication and success rates were comparable in the two groups. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for Group 2, with 50 % of patients who were discharged on day 1. Moreover, the data showed a significant lesser need in number and length of bladder catheter and ureteral stents in Group 2.

Discussion: The technique proposed overcome the inconveniences of the other procedures that are commonly used in bilateral RVU: difficulty in retrograde catheterization or ureteroscopy after bilateral cross-trigonal reimplantation, the risk of transient bladder dysfunction after bilateral extravesical reimplantation and the low rate of success for high grade reflux of the sub ureteric Deflux® injection. The main limitation of the study lies in its retrospective nature and in the relatively short median follow-up.

Conclusion: The combined Lich-Gregoir extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation and sub-ureteric Deflux® injection for the treatment of primary asymmetrical VUR is an effective alternative to the gold standard cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation. Moreover, the position of the ureteric orifice is not modified in the eventuality of endourological procedures into adulthood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Board Ovotesticular cords and ovotesticular follicles: New histologic markers for human ovotesticular syndrome Comparing binary & ordinal definitions of urinary & stool continence outcomes: Data from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry Contemporary disparities in progression to orchiopexy for cryptorchidism as reported in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1