波兰语版牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS-PL)的验证。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Special Care in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1111/scd.13070
Justyna Hajto-Bryk, Ilona Barańska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini, Monika Bełch, Joanna Zarzecka
{"title":"波兰语版牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS-PL)的验证。","authors":"Justyna Hajto-Bryk, Ilona Barańska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini, Monika Bełch, Joanna Zarzecka","doi":"10.1111/scd.13070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ageism is one of the common forms of discrimination and prejudice. It has also been shown to be present in health professionals, including doctors, nurses, and medical students.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the Ageism Scale For Dental Students (ASDS) into Polish, perform a culture adaptation, and conduct a preliminary validation analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was administered to 202 third-, fourth-, and fifth-year students at the Jagiellonian University (No. 1072.6120.283.2020). Data were analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA) with an oblique, Promax rotation, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha (α) was calculated to check the internal consistency reliability. Discriminant validity was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA produced a 10-item scale distributed into three factors, which explains 59.52% of the total variance. Factor 1 (\"preconceived notions about dental treatment\") contained four items (α = 0.703), Factor 2 (\"cost-benefit of providing care for older patients\")-four items (α = 0.660) and Factor 3 (\"dentist-older patient interaction\")-two items (α = 0.662). CFA confirmed that the model is a good fit (RMSE = 0.058, 90% CI from 0.014 to 0.092, CFI = 0.950, and TLI = 0.926). The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences in factors or individual items related to the year of the study, gender, and having a history of living with an older person(s) or an older patient(s) treated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validation of the ASDS conducted in Poland identified 10 items with sufficient validity and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Polish version of an Ageism Scale for Dental Students (ASDS-PL).\",\"authors\":\"Justyna Hajto-Bryk, Ilona Barańska, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini, Monika Bełch, Joanna Zarzecka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scd.13070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ageism is one of the common forms of discrimination and prejudice. It has also been shown to be present in health professionals, including doctors, nurses, and medical students.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the Ageism Scale For Dental Students (ASDS) into Polish, perform a culture adaptation, and conduct a preliminary validation analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was administered to 202 third-, fourth-, and fifth-year students at the Jagiellonian University (No. 1072.6120.283.2020). Data were analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA) with an oblique, Promax rotation, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha (α) was calculated to check the internal consistency reliability. Discriminant validity was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCA produced a 10-item scale distributed into three factors, which explains 59.52% of the total variance. Factor 1 (\\\"preconceived notions about dental treatment\\\") contained four items (α = 0.703), Factor 2 (\\\"cost-benefit of providing care for older patients\\\")-four items (α = 0.660) and Factor 3 (\\\"dentist-older patient interaction\\\")-two items (α = 0.662). CFA confirmed that the model is a good fit (RMSE = 0.058, 90% CI from 0.014 to 0.092, CFI = 0.950, and TLI = 0.926). The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences in factors or individual items related to the year of the study, gender, and having a history of living with an older person(s) or an older patient(s) treated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validation of the ASDS conducted in Poland identified 10 items with sufficient validity and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:年龄歧视是常见的歧视和偏见形式之一。研究目的:本研究旨在将牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS)翻译成波兰语,进行文化适应性调整,并进行初步验证分析:调查对象为雅盖隆大学 202 名三年级、四年级和五年级学生(编号 1072.6120.283.2020)。数据采用主成分分析法(PCA)进行分析,并进行了斜交、Promax 旋转和确证因子分析(CFA)。计算了 Cronbach's alpha (α),以检查内部一致性可靠性。使用 Mann-Whitney 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验分析了区分效度:PCA 得出的 10 项量表分为三个因子,解释了总方差的 59.52%。因子 1("关于牙科治疗的先入为主的观念")包含四个项目(α = 0.703),因子 2("为老年患者提供治疗的成本效益")--四个项目(α = 0.660),因子 3("牙医与老年患者的互动")--两个项目(α = 0.662)。CFA 证实模型拟合良好(RMSE = 0.058,90% CI 从 0.014 到 0.092,CFI = 0.950,TLI = 0.926)。判别效度显示,与研究年份、性别、曾与老年人同住或曾治疗过老年患者有关的因素或单个项目在统计学上存在显著差异:在波兰进行的 ASDS 验证确定了 10 个具有充分有效性和可靠性的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Polish version of an Ageism Scale for Dental Students (ASDS-PL).

Background: Ageism is one of the common forms of discrimination and prejudice. It has also been shown to be present in health professionals, including doctors, nurses, and medical students.

Aims: The aim of this study was to translate the Ageism Scale For Dental Students (ASDS) into Polish, perform a culture adaptation, and conduct a preliminary validation analysis.

Methods: The survey was administered to 202 third-, fourth-, and fifth-year students at the Jagiellonian University (No. 1072.6120.283.2020). Data were analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA) with an oblique, Promax rotation, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's alpha (α) was calculated to check the internal consistency reliability. Discriminant validity was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: PCA produced a 10-item scale distributed into three factors, which explains 59.52% of the total variance. Factor 1 ("preconceived notions about dental treatment") contained four items (α = 0.703), Factor 2 ("cost-benefit of providing care for older patients")-four items (α = 0.660) and Factor 3 ("dentist-older patient interaction")-two items (α = 0.662). CFA confirmed that the model is a good fit (RMSE = 0.058, 90% CI from 0.014 to 0.092, CFI = 0.950, and TLI = 0.926). The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences in factors or individual items related to the year of the study, gender, and having a history of living with an older person(s) or an older patient(s) treated.

Conclusion: The validation of the ASDS conducted in Poland identified 10 items with sufficient validity and reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Special Care in Dentistry
Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Oral complications associated with trigeminal trophic syndrome: A case report. Are orofacial pain assessment tools for adults who cannot self-report pain suitable for dental practice? A scoping review. Dentistry and Sturge-Weber syndrome: Case report and narrative review. Geriatric dentistry course effect against ageism among dental students: A cohort study. Exploring the oral health status of children living with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): A caregiver described self-report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1