咪达唑仑--地西泮的替代品,用于治疗神经毒剂引起的癫痫发作。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110171
Lukas Gorecki , Jaroslav Pejchal , Carilyn Torruellas , Jan Korabecny , Ondrej Soukup
{"title":"咪达唑仑--地西泮的替代品,用于治疗神经毒剂引起的癫痫发作。","authors":"Lukas Gorecki ,&nbsp;Jaroslav Pejchal ,&nbsp;Carilyn Torruellas ,&nbsp;Jan Korabecny ,&nbsp;Ondrej Soukup","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A benzodiazepine, diazepam, has been the leading antidote for seizures caused by nerve agents, the most toxic chemical weapons of mass destruction, since the 1960s. However, its limitations have often brought questions about its usefulness. Extensive effort has been devoted into exploring alternatives, such as other benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, or glutamate antagonists. However, only few showed clear clinical benefit. The only two options to ultimately reach clinical milestones are Avizafone, a water-soluble prodrug of diazepam adopted by the French and UK armed forces, and intramuscular midazolam, adopted by the US Army. The recently FDA-approved new intramuscular application of midazolam brought several advantages, such as rapid onset of action, short duration with predictable pharmacokinetics, increased water solubility for aqueous injectable solutions, and prolonged storage stability. Herein, we discuss the pitfalls and prospects of using midazolam as a substitute in anticonvulsant therapy with a particular focus on military purposes in combat casualty care. We have also considered and discussed several other alternatives that are currently at the experimental level. Recent studies have shown the superiority of midazolam over other benzodiazepines in the medical management of poisoned casualties. While its use in emergency care is straightforward, the proper dose for soldiers under battlefield conditions is questionable due to its sedative effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19139,"journal":{"name":"Neuropharmacology","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 110171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midazolam - A diazepam replacement for the management of nerve agent-induced seizures\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Gorecki ,&nbsp;Jaroslav Pejchal ,&nbsp;Carilyn Torruellas ,&nbsp;Jan Korabecny ,&nbsp;Ondrej Soukup\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A benzodiazepine, diazepam, has been the leading antidote for seizures caused by nerve agents, the most toxic chemical weapons of mass destruction, since the 1960s. However, its limitations have often brought questions about its usefulness. Extensive effort has been devoted into exploring alternatives, such as other benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, or glutamate antagonists. However, only few showed clear clinical benefit. The only two options to ultimately reach clinical milestones are Avizafone, a water-soluble prodrug of diazepam adopted by the French and UK armed forces, and intramuscular midazolam, adopted by the US Army. The recently FDA-approved new intramuscular application of midazolam brought several advantages, such as rapid onset of action, short duration with predictable pharmacokinetics, increased water solubility for aqueous injectable solutions, and prolonged storage stability. Herein, we discuss the pitfalls and prospects of using midazolam as a substitute in anticonvulsant therapy with a particular focus on military purposes in combat casualty care. We have also considered and discussed several other alternatives that are currently at the experimental level. Recent studies have shown the superiority of midazolam over other benzodiazepines in the medical management of poisoned casualties. While its use in emergency care is straightforward, the proper dose for soldiers under battlefield conditions is questionable due to its sedative effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839082400340X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839082400340X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,苯二氮卓类药物地西泮一直是治疗神经毒剂(毒性最强的大规模杀伤性化学武器)引起的癫痫发作的主要解毒剂。然而,它的局限性常常让人质疑其效用。人们投入了大量精力探索替代品,如其他苯二氮卓类药物、抗胆碱能药物或谷氨酸拮抗剂。然而,只有少数药物显示出明显的临床疗效。最终达到临床里程碑的只有两种选择,一种是法国和英国军队采用的地西泮水溶性原药 Avizafone,另一种是美国军队采用的肌肉注射咪达唑仑。最近获得 FDA 批准的咪达唑仑肌肉注射新药具有多种优势,如起效迅速、持续时间短且药代动力学可预测、水溶性注射液的水溶性增加以及储存稳定性延长。在此,我们讨论了在抗惊厥治疗中使用咪达唑仑作为替代品的隐患和前景,尤其侧重于作战伤员护理中的军事用途。我们还考虑并讨论了目前处于实验阶段的其他几种替代品。最近的研究表明,在对中毒伤员进行医疗处理时,咪达唑仑比其他苯二氮卓类药物更有优势。虽然咪达唑仑在急救中的使用简单明了,但由于其镇静作用,在战场条件下对士兵使用的适当剂量却值得商榷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midazolam - A diazepam replacement for the management of nerve agent-induced seizures
A benzodiazepine, diazepam, has been the leading antidote for seizures caused by nerve agents, the most toxic chemical weapons of mass destruction, since the 1960s. However, its limitations have often brought questions about its usefulness. Extensive effort has been devoted into exploring alternatives, such as other benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, or glutamate antagonists. However, only few showed clear clinical benefit. The only two options to ultimately reach clinical milestones are Avizafone, a water-soluble prodrug of diazepam adopted by the French and UK armed forces, and intramuscular midazolam, adopted by the US Army. The recently FDA-approved new intramuscular application of midazolam brought several advantages, such as rapid onset of action, short duration with predictable pharmacokinetics, increased water solubility for aqueous injectable solutions, and prolonged storage stability. Herein, we discuss the pitfalls and prospects of using midazolam as a substitute in anticonvulsant therapy with a particular focus on military purposes in combat casualty care. We have also considered and discussed several other alternatives that are currently at the experimental level. Recent studies have shown the superiority of midazolam over other benzodiazepines in the medical management of poisoned casualties. While its use in emergency care is straightforward, the proper dose for soldiers under battlefield conditions is questionable due to its sedative effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropharmacology
Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
288
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Neuropharmacology publishes high quality, original research and review articles within the discipline of neuroscience, especially articles with a neuropharmacological component. However, papers within any area of neuroscience will be considered. The journal does not usually accept clinical research, although preclinical neuropharmacological studies in humans may be considered. The journal only considers submissions in which the chemical structures and compositions of experimental agents are readily available in the literature or disclosed by the authors in the submitted manuscript. Only in exceptional circumstances will natural products be considered, and then only if the preparation is well defined by scientific means. Neuropharmacology publishes articles of any length (original research and reviews).
期刊最新文献
Functional evidence that S-nitroso-L-cysteine may be a candidate carotid body neurotransmitter. Sex differences in the antinociceptive effect of codeine and its peripheral but not central metabolism in adult mice. The role of the dopamine D1 receptor in anticipatory pleasure and social play. Effects of genetic knockdown of the serotonin transporter on established L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and gene expression in hemiparkinsonian rats. 20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3 protects against focal cerebral ischemia‒reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1