再加工 "鸭嘴 "型 N95 口罩的密合度测试失败。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Southern Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001738
Phillip Moschella, Wesley Liao, Alain H Litwin, Jonn Foulk, Jeff Anthony, Xiyan Tan, Christine Cole
{"title":"再加工 \"鸭嘴 \"型 N95 口罩的密合度测试失败。","authors":"Phillip Moschella, Wesley Liao, Alain H Litwin, Jonn Foulk, Jeff Anthony, Xiyan Tan, Christine Cole","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In response to worldwide shortages of N95 masks during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 pandemic, various strategies have been used. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend several strategies, including simple isolation to reprocessing methods using vaporized hydrogen peroxide to guide reuse of masks up to five times. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) quantitative fit testing was performed after five trials of donning and doffing in one cohort of new masks and two cohorts of repeatedly sterilized \"duckbill\"-type N95 masks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One cohort of new masks and two cohorts of sterilized masks were repeatedly subjected to 35% vaporized hydrogen peroxide for either five or 10 cycles. Then, they were subjected to five trials of donning and doffing, with NIOSH quantitative fit testing performed after each wear cycle to assess for any degradation on fit performance caused by sterilization and/or repeated donning and doffing up to the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limit of five times. All of the fit testing was performed on a single volunteer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The means and 95% confidence intervals for each cohort and the individual results for each mask within each cohort were reported. A χ<sup>2</sup> analysis showed significant differences in percentages of masks that pass fit testing in both recycled mask cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data show the variability of NIOSH fit testing results of both new and sterilized masks. The mask recycling program of our partner health systems thus discarded these types of masks due to the variable failure rate. Health systems should consider individual evaluation to inform their overall policies on mask reuse and recycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed \\\"Duckbill\\\"-Type N95 Masks.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Moschella, Wesley Liao, Alain H Litwin, Jonn Foulk, Jeff Anthony, Xiyan Tan, Christine Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In response to worldwide shortages of N95 masks during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 pandemic, various strategies have been used. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend several strategies, including simple isolation to reprocessing methods using vaporized hydrogen peroxide to guide reuse of masks up to five times. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) quantitative fit testing was performed after five trials of donning and doffing in one cohort of new masks and two cohorts of repeatedly sterilized \\\"duckbill\\\"-type N95 masks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One cohort of new masks and two cohorts of sterilized masks were repeatedly subjected to 35% vaporized hydrogen peroxide for either five or 10 cycles. Then, they were subjected to five trials of donning and doffing, with NIOSH quantitative fit testing performed after each wear cycle to assess for any degradation on fit performance caused by sterilization and/or repeated donning and doffing up to the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limit of five times. All of the fit testing was performed on a single volunteer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The means and 95% confidence intervals for each cohort and the individual results for each mask within each cohort were reported. A χ<sup>2</sup> analysis showed significant differences in percentages of masks that pass fit testing in both recycled mask cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data show the variability of NIOSH fit testing results of both new and sterilized masks. The mask recycling program of our partner health systems thus discarded these types of masks due to the variable failure rate. Health systems should consider individual evaluation to inform their overall policies on mask reuse and recycling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在严重急性呼吸系统综合症-2 型冠状病毒大流行期间,为应对全球 N95 口罩短缺问题,人们采取了各种策略。美国疾病控制和预防中心推荐了几种策略,包括从简单隔离到使用蒸发过氧化氢进行再处理的方法,以指导口罩的重复使用,最多可重复使用五次。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)对一组新口罩和两组反复消毒的 "鸭嘴 "型 N95 口罩进行了五次佩戴和脱下试验后,进行了定量密合度测试:方法:将一批新口罩和两批已消毒口罩在 35% 的蒸发双氧水中反复消毒 5 或 10 次。然后,对它们进行五次穿戴试验,并在每个佩戴周期后进行 NIOSH 密合度定量测试,以评估消毒和/或重复穿戴和脱下对密合度性能造成的任何降低,最高达美国疾病控制和预防中心建议的五次限制。所有密合度测试均在一名志愿者身上进行:报告了每个队列的平均值和 95% 置信区间,以及每个队列中每个面罩的单独结果。χ2分析表明,在两个回收面罩队列中,通过密合度测试的面罩百分比存在显著差异:这些数据显示了新面具和消毒面具的 NIOSH 密合度测试结果的差异性。由于不合格率不一,我们的合作医疗系统的口罩回收计划因此放弃了这些类型的口罩。医疗系统应考虑进行个别评估,为其口罩再利用和回收的总体政策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed "Duckbill"-Type N95 Masks.

Objectives: In response to worldwide shortages of N95 masks during the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 pandemic, various strategies have been used. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend several strategies, including simple isolation to reprocessing methods using vaporized hydrogen peroxide to guide reuse of masks up to five times. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) quantitative fit testing was performed after five trials of donning and doffing in one cohort of new masks and two cohorts of repeatedly sterilized "duckbill"-type N95 masks.

Methods: One cohort of new masks and two cohorts of sterilized masks were repeatedly subjected to 35% vaporized hydrogen peroxide for either five or 10 cycles. Then, they were subjected to five trials of donning and doffing, with NIOSH quantitative fit testing performed after each wear cycle to assess for any degradation on fit performance caused by sterilization and/or repeated donning and doffing up to the recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention limit of five times. All of the fit testing was performed on a single volunteer.

Results: The means and 95% confidence intervals for each cohort and the individual results for each mask within each cohort were reported. A χ2 analysis showed significant differences in percentages of masks that pass fit testing in both recycled mask cohorts.

Conclusions: These data show the variability of NIOSH fit testing results of both new and sterilized masks. The mask recycling program of our partner health systems thus discarded these types of masks due to the variable failure rate. Health systems should consider individual evaluation to inform their overall policies on mask reuse and recycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of Transportation-Related Barriers to HIV Care in South Carolina. Association of Socioeconomic Variables with Primary Cesarean Section. Exploring Bias in Health Care: Using Art to Facilitate a Narrative Medicine Approach among Third-Year Medical Students. Fit Testing Failure of Reprocessed "Duckbill"-Type N95 Masks. Improving Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Control with a Dedicated Patient Navigator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1