Abdulrahim Saleh Alrasheed, Mohammed Abdullah Alqadhibi, Rammaz Hussam Khoja, Abdulaziz Saad Alayyaf, Duaa Saleh Alhumoudi, Mubarak Ibrahim Aldawlan, Bedoor Obidallah Alghanmi, Fahad Salman Almutairi, Mohammed Ali Bin-Mahfooz, Lina Abdulrahim Altalhi, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤免疫调节的新兴疗法:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdulrahim Saleh Alrasheed, Mohammed Abdullah Alqadhibi, Rammaz Hussam Khoja, Abdulaziz Saad Alayyaf, Duaa Saleh Alhumoudi, Mubarak Ibrahim Aldawlan, Bedoor Obidallah Alghanmi, Fahad Salman Almutairi, Mohammed Ali Bin-Mahfooz, Lina Abdulrahim Altalhi, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa","doi":"10.25259/SNI_502_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant global health burden, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Mounting evidence underscores the intricate involvement of dysregulated immune responses in TBI pathophysiology, highlighting the potential for immunomodulatory interventions to mitigate secondary injury cascades and enhance patient outcomes. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, optimizing therapeutic strategies remains a critical challenge in TBI management. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of emerging immunomodulatory therapies in the context of TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL for relevant studies investigating the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in TBI that were meticulously selected for inclusion. Two independent reviewers meticulously performed data extraction and quality assessment, adhering to predefined criteria. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality rates, the Glasgow coma scale, and adverse events, were meticulously scrutinized. Meta-analysis techniques were employed to assess treatment effects across studies quantitatively and analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies (<i>n</i> = 1 observational and <i>n</i> = 13 RCTs) were included in our study. Meta-analysis showed no significant overall mortality difference, but erythropoietin (EPO) significantly reduced mortality (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.78, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The adverse event meta-analysis revealed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunomodulatory therapies did not significantly affect overall mortality, but EPO demonstrated promising results. Adverse events did not significantly differ from controls. Further research is warranted to refine TBI treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging therapies for immunomodulation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahim Saleh Alrasheed, Mohammed Abdullah Alqadhibi, Rammaz Hussam Khoja, Abdulaziz Saad Alayyaf, Duaa Saleh Alhumoudi, Mubarak Ibrahim Aldawlan, Bedoor Obidallah Alghanmi, Fahad Salman Almutairi, Mohammed Ali Bin-Mahfooz, Lina Abdulrahim Altalhi, Saud Nayef Aldanyowi, Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Awn Abdulmohsen Alessa\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_502_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant global health burden, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Mounting evidence underscores the intricate involvement of dysregulated immune responses in TBI pathophysiology, highlighting the potential for immunomodulatory interventions to mitigate secondary injury cascades and enhance patient outcomes. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, optimizing therapeutic strategies remains a critical challenge in TBI management. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of emerging immunomodulatory therapies in the context of TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL for relevant studies investigating the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in TBI that were meticulously selected for inclusion. Two independent reviewers meticulously performed data extraction and quality assessment, adhering to predefined criteria. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality rates, the Glasgow coma scale, and adverse events, were meticulously scrutinized. Meta-analysis techniques were employed to assess treatment effects across studies quantitatively and analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies (<i>n</i> = 1 observational and <i>n</i> = 13 RCTs) were included in our study. Meta-analysis showed no significant overall mortality difference, but erythropoietin (EPO) significantly reduced mortality (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.78, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The adverse event meta-analysis revealed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunomodulatory therapies did not significantly affect overall mortality, but EPO demonstrated promising results. Adverse events did not significantly differ from controls. Further research is warranted to refine TBI treatment protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450791/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_502_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_502_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球健康的重大负担,通常会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。越来越多的证据表明,免疫反应失调与创伤性脑损伤的病理生理学有着错综复杂的关系,这凸显了免疫调节干预措施在减轻继发性损伤级联和改善患者预后方面的潜力。尽管治疗模式取得了进步,但优化治疗策略仍是创伤性脑损伤管理中的一项关键挑战。为了弥补这一不足,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在严格评估新出现的免疫调节疗法对创伤性脑损伤的疗效和安全性:我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CENTRAL 等电子数据库中搜索了调查免疫调节疗法在创伤性脑损伤中疗效的相关研究,并对这些研究进行了精心筛选。两位独立审稿人按照预先设定的标准,认真进行了数据提取和质量评估。对随机对照试验(RCT)和报告临床相关结果(如死亡率、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和不良事件)的观察性研究都进行了细致的审查。采用 Meta 分析技术对各研究的治疗效果进行定量评估,并使用 Review Manager 软件(5.2 版)进行分析:我们的研究共纳入了 14 项研究(n = 1 项观察性研究和 n = 13 项研究性临床试验)。元分析表明,总体死亡率无显著差异,但促红细胞生成素(EPO)可显著降低死亡率(几率比=0.49;95% 置信区间:0.31-0.78,P=0.002)。不良事件荟萃分析结果显示两者无明显差异:免疫调节疗法对总死亡率的影响不大,但EPO显示出良好的效果。不良事件与对照组无明显差异。有必要开展进一步研究,以完善创伤性脑损伤治疗方案。
Emerging therapies for immunomodulation in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant global health burden, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Mounting evidence underscores the intricate involvement of dysregulated immune responses in TBI pathophysiology, highlighting the potential for immunomodulatory interventions to mitigate secondary injury cascades and enhance patient outcomes. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, optimizing therapeutic strategies remains a critical challenge in TBI management. To address this gap, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of emerging immunomodulatory therapies in the context of TBI.
Methods: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and CENTRAL for relevant studies investigating the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in TBI that were meticulously selected for inclusion. Two independent reviewers meticulously performed data extraction and quality assessment, adhering to predefined criteria. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting clinically relevant outcomes, such as mortality rates, the Glasgow coma scale, and adverse events, were meticulously scrutinized. Meta-analysis techniques were employed to assess treatment effects across studies quantitatively and analyzed using the Review Manager software (version 5.2).
Results: Fourteen studies (n = 1 observational and n = 13 RCTs) were included in our study. Meta-analysis showed no significant overall mortality difference, but erythropoietin (EPO) significantly reduced mortality (odds ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.78, P = 0.002). The adverse event meta-analysis revealed no significant differences.
Conclusion: Immunomodulatory therapies did not significantly affect overall mortality, but EPO demonstrated promising results. Adverse events did not significantly differ from controls. Further research is warranted to refine TBI treatment protocols.