确定影响膝关节周围截骨术术后效果的最佳中枢敏感性清单临界值。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Science Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.009
Shoichi Hasegawa, Hideyuki Koga, Yusuke Nakagawa, Hao Ding, Aritoshi Yoshihara, Masaki Amemiya, Takashi Hoshino, Mai Katakura, Nobutake Ozeki, Tomomasa Nakamura, Hiroki Katagiri
{"title":"确定影响膝关节周围截骨术术后效果的最佳中枢敏感性清单临界值。","authors":"Shoichi Hasegawa, Hideyuki Koga, Yusuke Nakagawa, Hao Ding, Aritoshi Yoshihara, Masaki Amemiya, Takashi Hoshino, Mai Katakura, Nobutake Ozeki, Tomomasa Nakamura, Hiroki Katagiri","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central sensitization has a significant effect on pain after osteotomy around the knee (OAK). The central sensitization inventory (CSI) score is considered disease specific, and the appropriate cut-off values for OAK are unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK based on the postoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent OAK for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were included. The postoperative KOOS symptoms, pain, and activities of daily living (ADL) were categorized into two groups (score ≥80 each for symptoms, pain, and ADL, and score <80 for any of the three) and were used as factors to calculate receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve with the CSI score. Cut-off values were calculated using the Youden index and the threshold value closest to the upper left corner. Subsequently, logistic multivariate analysis was performed using the KOOS and the obtained CSI cut-off values and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included in this study. The area under the curve of the model was 0.801 (95 % confidence interval, 0.74-0.87), and a CSI score of 12 was determined as the cut-off value. Logistic multivariate analysis based on the cut-off value showed that only the CSI score (odds ratio, 9.79; 95 % CI, 4.47-21.4; P < 0.01) was significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK calculated using the postoperative KOOS was 12, which was supported by multivariate analysis results. Central sensitization assessment with an appropriate cut-off value would allow a more personalized treatment approach and may contribute to a better postoperative outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing an optimal central sensitization inventory cut-off value affecting postoperative outcomes of osteotomy around the knee.\",\"authors\":\"Shoichi Hasegawa, Hideyuki Koga, Yusuke Nakagawa, Hao Ding, Aritoshi Yoshihara, Masaki Amemiya, Takashi Hoshino, Mai Katakura, Nobutake Ozeki, Tomomasa Nakamura, Hiroki Katagiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central sensitization has a significant effect on pain after osteotomy around the knee (OAK). The central sensitization inventory (CSI) score is considered disease specific, and the appropriate cut-off values for OAK are unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK based on the postoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent OAK for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were included. The postoperative KOOS symptoms, pain, and activities of daily living (ADL) were categorized into two groups (score ≥80 each for symptoms, pain, and ADL, and score <80 for any of the three) and were used as factors to calculate receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve with the CSI score. Cut-off values were calculated using the Youden index and the threshold value closest to the upper left corner. Subsequently, logistic multivariate analysis was performed using the KOOS and the obtained CSI cut-off values and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients were included in this study. The area under the curve of the model was 0.801 (95 % confidence interval, 0.74-0.87), and a CSI score of 12 was determined as the cut-off value. Logistic multivariate analysis based on the cut-off value showed that only the CSI score (odds ratio, 9.79; 95 % CI, 4.47-21.4; P < 0.01) was significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK calculated using the postoperative KOOS was 12, which was supported by multivariate analysis results. Central sensitization assessment with an appropriate cut-off value would allow a more personalized treatment approach and may contribute to a better postoperative outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.09.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中枢敏感性对膝关节周围截骨术(OAK)后的疼痛有显著影响。中枢敏化量表(CSI)评分被认为具有疾病特异性,而 OAK 的适当临界值尚不明确。本研究的目的是根据术后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS),确定影响OAK术后结果的最佳CSI临界值:方法:纳入因内侧室膝骨关节炎接受OAK手术的患者。将术后 KOOS 的症状、疼痛和日常生活活动能力(ADL)分为两组(症状、疼痛和 ADL 各得分≥80 分,以及得分结果:本研究共纳入 173 名患者。模型的曲线下面积为 0.801(95 % 置信区间,0.74-0.87),CSI 评分 12 分被确定为临界值。根据临界值进行的逻辑多变量分析表明,只有 CSI 评分(几率比 9.79;95 % CI,4.47-21.4;P 结论:CSI 临界值为 12 分:使用术后 KOOS 计算出的影响 OAK 术后结果的最佳 CSI 临界值为 12,多变量分析结果也支持这一观点。使用合适的临界值进行中枢敏感性评估,可使治疗方法更加个性化,并有助于获得更好的术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing an optimal central sensitization inventory cut-off value affecting postoperative outcomes of osteotomy around the knee.

Background: Central sensitization has a significant effect on pain after osteotomy around the knee (OAK). The central sensitization inventory (CSI) score is considered disease specific, and the appropriate cut-off values for OAK are unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK based on the postoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS).

Methods: Patients who underwent OAK for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis were included. The postoperative KOOS symptoms, pain, and activities of daily living (ADL) were categorized into two groups (score ≥80 each for symptoms, pain, and ADL, and score <80 for any of the three) and were used as factors to calculate receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve with the CSI score. Cut-off values were calculated using the Youden index and the threshold value closest to the upper left corner. Subsequently, logistic multivariate analysis was performed using the KOOS and the obtained CSI cut-off values and other variables.

Results: A total of 173 patients were included in this study. The area under the curve of the model was 0.801 (95 % confidence interval, 0.74-0.87), and a CSI score of 12 was determined as the cut-off value. Logistic multivariate analysis based on the cut-off value showed that only the CSI score (odds ratio, 9.79; 95 % CI, 4.47-21.4; P < 0.01) was significant.

Conclusions: The optimal CSI cut-off value affecting the postoperative outcomes of OAK calculated using the postoperative KOOS was 12, which was supported by multivariate analysis results. Central sensitization assessment with an appropriate cut-off value would allow a more personalized treatment approach and may contribute to a better postoperative outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and results after conservative treatment or interfascicular neurolysis of 100 limbs with spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve palsy: A prospective Japanese multicenter study. Minimal clinically important difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Score and shoulder 36 after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study. What is the appropriate revascularisation approach in traumatic popliteal artery injury? Platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion fractures: An umbrella meta-analysis. Analysis of cancer multigene panel testing for osteosarcoma in pediatric and adults using the center for cancer genomics and advanced therapeutics database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1