连续约会者和多重约会者在评估策略、约会目标和他人看法方面的初步比较

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112906
Jayda P. Felder
{"title":"连续约会者和多重约会者在评估策略、约会目标和他人看法方面的初步比较","authors":"Jayda P. Felder","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The topic of how many potential partners one should casually date at the same time has been widely debated among the general public. <em>Serial daters</em> are those who only date one person at a time, whereas <em>multi-daters</em> are those who date multiple people at the same time. Despite the fact that these dating approaches appear to play a major role in the partner selection process, differences between serial daters and multi-daters have not been studied empirically. As such, the current research presents the first investigation of potential differences between serial daters and multi-daters regarding their strategies for evaluating and selecting potential partners, individual differences related to their dating goals, and how they may be perceived by others on the dating market. The results of two studies (total <em>N</em> = 460) revealed that multi-daters have a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation and may experience more decision difficulty than serial daters. Furthermore, serial daters are perceived as more genuine, intentional, and interested in commitment, whereas multi-daters are perceived as less trustworthy and more interested in casual or sex-only involvements. However, serial daters and multi-daters did not differ significantly in their evaluation strategies, nor in their implicit theories, commitment readiness, or general maximization tendency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A preliminary comparison of serial daters and multi-daters on their evaluation strategies, dating goals, and perceptions by others\",\"authors\":\"Jayda P. Felder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The topic of how many potential partners one should casually date at the same time has been widely debated among the general public. <em>Serial daters</em> are those who only date one person at a time, whereas <em>multi-daters</em> are those who date multiple people at the same time. Despite the fact that these dating approaches appear to play a major role in the partner selection process, differences between serial daters and multi-daters have not been studied empirically. As such, the current research presents the first investigation of potential differences between serial daters and multi-daters regarding their strategies for evaluating and selecting potential partners, individual differences related to their dating goals, and how they may be perceived by others on the dating market. The results of two studies (total <em>N</em> = 460) revealed that multi-daters have a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation and may experience more decision difficulty than serial daters. Furthermore, serial daters are perceived as more genuine, intentional, and interested in commitment, whereas multi-daters are perceived as less trustworthy and more interested in casual or sex-only involvements. However, serial daters and multi-daters did not differ significantly in their evaluation strategies, nor in their implicit theories, commitment readiness, or general maximization tendency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于一个人应该同时与多少个潜在伴侣随便约会的话题,在公众中引起了广泛的争论。连续约会者是指一次只与一个人约会的人,而多重约会者则是指同时与多人约会的人。尽管这些约会方式似乎在选择伴侣的过程中扮演着重要角色,但人们尚未对连续约会者和多人约会者之间的差异进行实证研究。因此,本研究首次调查了连续约会者和多重约会者在评估和选择潜在伴侣的策略方面的潜在差异、与约会目标相关的个体差异以及约会市场上其他人对他们的看法。两项研究(总人数=460)的结果显示,多重约会者的社会性取向更不受限制,可能比连续约会者更难做出决定。此外,连续约会者被认为更真诚、更用心、对承诺更感兴趣,而多重约会者则被认为不那么值得信赖,更喜欢随意的或只与性有关的交往。然而,连续约会者和多重约会者在评估策略、内隐理论、承诺准备程度或一般最大化倾向方面并无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A preliminary comparison of serial daters and multi-daters on their evaluation strategies, dating goals, and perceptions by others
The topic of how many potential partners one should casually date at the same time has been widely debated among the general public. Serial daters are those who only date one person at a time, whereas multi-daters are those who date multiple people at the same time. Despite the fact that these dating approaches appear to play a major role in the partner selection process, differences between serial daters and multi-daters have not been studied empirically. As such, the current research presents the first investigation of potential differences between serial daters and multi-daters regarding their strategies for evaluating and selecting potential partners, individual differences related to their dating goals, and how they may be perceived by others on the dating market. The results of two studies (total N = 460) revealed that multi-daters have a more unrestricted sociosexual orientation and may experience more decision difficulty than serial daters. Furthermore, serial daters are perceived as more genuine, intentional, and interested in commitment, whereas multi-daters are perceived as less trustworthy and more interested in casual or sex-only involvements. However, serial daters and multi-daters did not differ significantly in their evaluation strategies, nor in their implicit theories, commitment readiness, or general maximization tendency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Ambition as a doubled-edged sword: Career success and unethical behavior Different shades of narcissism at work: The relationships of narcissism dimensions with work-related outcomes The relation between adverse experiences and proactive aggression: The moderating role of emotional sensitivity Religious perfectionism, spiritual struggles, and sense of community: Associations with depression among ultra-Orthodox Jews Linking personality to gratitude in the Chinese context: The mediating role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1