活化热源对两种利用家用混合塑料废物生产的新型吸附剂的碳捕集性能的影响

IF 7.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of CO2 Utilization Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102950
Emmanuel Dan , Alan J. McCue , Davide Dionisi , Claudia Fernández Martín
{"title":"活化热源对两种利用家用混合塑料废物生产的新型吸附剂的碳捕集性能的影响","authors":"Emmanuel Dan ,&nbsp;Alan J. McCue ,&nbsp;Davide Dionisi ,&nbsp;Claudia Fernández Martín","doi":"10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study reveals the impact of the activation with microwave and conventional heating sources on textural properties and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of a mixed plastic-based char. Two mixed plastic-based adsorbents, one activated using microwaves and the other using conventional heating, were produced at optimum activation conditions, and subsequently compared. The findings show that both heating sources produced microporous adsorbents, but activation heating sources influenced their physicochemical properties and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. The microwave-produced activated carbon (AC) displayed superior BET surface area, total, micro- and ultra-micropore volumes compared to the conventionally produced AC. The microwave-produced AC possessed CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities of 1.66 and 2.37 mmol/g under dynamic and equilibrium conditions, respectively, at 25 °C and 1 bar. These capacities represent an 8 and 30 % higher uptake, respectively, compared to the 1.53 and 1.66 mmol/g displayed by the conventionally prepared AC under the same adsorption conditions. Both samples displayed stable and excellent CO<sub>2</sub> recyclability over 10 adsorption-desorption cycles, with desorption efficiencies ranging from 93.46 % to 96.72 % (microwave- and conventionally- produced ACs respectively). The Avrami model most accurately described the experimental CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption data under dynamic conditions, while the Sip model gave the best fit for equilibrium conditions. These findings apply to both types of ACs at various temperatures, irrespective of the heating source. Overall microwave heating is more efficient than conventional heating, requiring 300°C lower temperature, 115 minutes shorter time, 0.79 kWh less energy, and less KOH. It improves CO<sub>2</sub> uptake and reduces production costs by 80 %, offering a sustainable alternative for CO<sub>2</sub> adsorbent production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102950"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of the activation heating source on the carbon capture performance of two new adsorbents produced from household-mixed-plastic waste\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Dan ,&nbsp;Alan J. McCue ,&nbsp;Davide Dionisi ,&nbsp;Claudia Fernández Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study reveals the impact of the activation with microwave and conventional heating sources on textural properties and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of a mixed plastic-based char. Two mixed plastic-based adsorbents, one activated using microwaves and the other using conventional heating, were produced at optimum activation conditions, and subsequently compared. The findings show that both heating sources produced microporous adsorbents, but activation heating sources influenced their physicochemical properties and CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. The microwave-produced activated carbon (AC) displayed superior BET surface area, total, micro- and ultra-micropore volumes compared to the conventionally produced AC. The microwave-produced AC possessed CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities of 1.66 and 2.37 mmol/g under dynamic and equilibrium conditions, respectively, at 25 °C and 1 bar. These capacities represent an 8 and 30 % higher uptake, respectively, compared to the 1.53 and 1.66 mmol/g displayed by the conventionally prepared AC under the same adsorption conditions. Both samples displayed stable and excellent CO<sub>2</sub> recyclability over 10 adsorption-desorption cycles, with desorption efficiencies ranging from 93.46 % to 96.72 % (microwave- and conventionally- produced ACs respectively). The Avrami model most accurately described the experimental CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption data under dynamic conditions, while the Sip model gave the best fit for equilibrium conditions. These findings apply to both types of ACs at various temperatures, irrespective of the heating source. Overall microwave heating is more efficient than conventional heating, requiring 300°C lower temperature, 115 minutes shorter time, 0.79 kWh less energy, and less KOH. It improves CO<sub>2</sub> uptake and reduces production costs by 80 %, offering a sustainable alternative for CO<sub>2</sub> adsorbent production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of CO2 Utilization\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of CO2 Utilization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212982024002853\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CO2 Utilization","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212982024002853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究揭示了微波活化和传统加热源对混合塑料基炭的质地特性和二氧化碳吸收的影响。研究人员在最佳活化条件下制备了两种混合塑料吸附剂,一种使用微波活化,另一种使用传统加热,并进行了比较。研究结果表明,两种加热源都能产生微孔吸附剂,但活化加热源会影响吸附剂的理化性质和二氧化碳吸收量。与传统的活性炭相比,微波生产的活性炭(AC)在 BET 表面积、总孔、微孔和超微孔体积方面都更胜一筹。在 25 °C 和 1 bar 的动态和平衡条件下,微波生产的活性炭的二氧化碳吸附容量分别为 1.66 和 2.37 mmol/g。在相同的吸附条件下,传统制备的 AC 的吸附能力分别为 1.53 和 1.66 mmol/g,而这些吸附能力分别比传统制备的 AC 高出 8% 和 30%。在 10 次吸附-解吸循环中,两种样品都显示出稳定而出色的二氧化碳可回收性,解吸效率从 93.46% 到 96.72%(分别为微波制备的 AC 和传统制备的 AC)。Avrami 模型最准确地描述了动态条件下的二氧化碳吸附实验数据,而 Sip 模型则最适合平衡条件。这些发现适用于不同温度下的两种交流电,与加热源无关。总体而言,微波加热比传统加热更有效,所需的温度低 300°C,时间短 115 分钟,能耗低 0.79 千瓦时,KOH 用量少。它提高了二氧化碳的吸收率,并将生产成本降低了 80%,为二氧化碳吸附剂的生产提供了一种可持续的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of the activation heating source on the carbon capture performance of two new adsorbents produced from household-mixed-plastic waste
This study reveals the impact of the activation with microwave and conventional heating sources on textural properties and CO2 uptake of a mixed plastic-based char. Two mixed plastic-based adsorbents, one activated using microwaves and the other using conventional heating, were produced at optimum activation conditions, and subsequently compared. The findings show that both heating sources produced microporous adsorbents, but activation heating sources influenced their physicochemical properties and CO2 uptake. The microwave-produced activated carbon (AC) displayed superior BET surface area, total, micro- and ultra-micropore volumes compared to the conventionally produced AC. The microwave-produced AC possessed CO2 adsorption capacities of 1.66 and 2.37 mmol/g under dynamic and equilibrium conditions, respectively, at 25 °C and 1 bar. These capacities represent an 8 and 30 % higher uptake, respectively, compared to the 1.53 and 1.66 mmol/g displayed by the conventionally prepared AC under the same adsorption conditions. Both samples displayed stable and excellent CO2 recyclability over 10 adsorption-desorption cycles, with desorption efficiencies ranging from 93.46 % to 96.72 % (microwave- and conventionally- produced ACs respectively). The Avrami model most accurately described the experimental CO2 adsorption data under dynamic conditions, while the Sip model gave the best fit for equilibrium conditions. These findings apply to both types of ACs at various temperatures, irrespective of the heating source. Overall microwave heating is more efficient than conventional heating, requiring 300°C lower temperature, 115 minutes shorter time, 0.79 kWh less energy, and less KOH. It improves CO2 uptake and reduces production costs by 80 %, offering a sustainable alternative for CO2 adsorbent production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Journal of CO2 Utilization CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
10.40%
发文量
406
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of CO2 Utilization offers a single, multi-disciplinary, scholarly platform for the exchange of novel research in the field of CO2 re-use for scientists and engineers in chemicals, fuels and materials. The emphasis is on the dissemination of leading-edge research from basic science to the development of new processes, technologies and applications. The Journal of CO2 Utilization publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, reviews, and short communications, including experimental and theoretical work, and analytical models and simulations.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-phase CO2 hydrogenation to methanol synthesis: Solvent screening, process design and techno-economic evaluation Evolution law of the pore structure of CO2-H2O-coal in liquid CO2-ECBM Effects of the use of acetone as co-solvent on the financial viability of bio-crude production by hydrothermal liquefaction of CO2 captured by microalgae Reactivity of aqueous carbonated cement pastes: Effect of chemical composition and carbonation conditions Recent advancements in integrating CO2 capture from flue gas and ambient air with thermal catalytic conversion for efficient CO2 utilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1