QUAIDE - 内窥镜诊断人工智能临床前研究的质量评估

IF 23 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820
Giulio Antonelli, Diogo Libanio, Albert Jeroen De Groof, Fons van der Sommen, Pietro Mascagni, Pieter Sinonquel, Mohamed Abdelrahim, Omer Ahmad, Tyler Berzin, Pradeep Bhandari, Michael Bretthauer, Miguel Coimbra, Evelien Dekker, Alanna Ebigbo, Tom Eelbode, Leonardo Frazzoni, Seth A Gross, Ryu Ishihara, Michal Filip Kaminski, Helmut Messmann, Yuichi Mori, Nicolas Padoy, Sravanthi Parasa, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Francesco Renna, Alessandro Repici, Cem Simsek, Marco Spadaccini, Raf Bisschops, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Cesare Hassan, Mario Dinis Ribeiro
{"title":"QUAIDE - 内窥镜诊断人工智能临床前研究的质量评估","authors":"Giulio Antonelli, Diogo Libanio, Albert Jeroen De Groof, Fons van der Sommen, Pietro Mascagni, Pieter Sinonquel, Mohamed Abdelrahim, Omer Ahmad, Tyler Berzin, Pradeep Bhandari, Michael Bretthauer, Miguel Coimbra, Evelien Dekker, Alanna Ebigbo, Tom Eelbode, Leonardo Frazzoni, Seth A Gross, Ryu Ishihara, Michal Filip Kaminski, Helmut Messmann, Yuichi Mori, Nicolas Padoy, Sravanthi Parasa, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Francesco Renna, Alessandro Repici, Cem Simsek, Marco Spadaccini, Raf Bisschops, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Cesare Hassan, Mario Dinis Ribeiro","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy. The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted. Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1–14), present results (2. Results, statements 15–16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17–18). The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":12825,"journal":{"name":"Gut","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Antonelli, Diogo Libanio, Albert Jeroen De Groof, Fons van der Sommen, Pietro Mascagni, Pieter Sinonquel, Mohamed Abdelrahim, Omer Ahmad, Tyler Berzin, Pradeep Bhandari, Michael Bretthauer, Miguel Coimbra, Evelien Dekker, Alanna Ebigbo, Tom Eelbode, Leonardo Frazzoni, Seth A Gross, Ryu Ishihara, Michal Filip Kaminski, Helmut Messmann, Yuichi Mori, Nicolas Padoy, Sravanthi Parasa, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Francesco Renna, Alessandro Repici, Cem Simsek, Marco Spadaccini, Raf Bisschops, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Cesare Hassan, Mario Dinis Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy. The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted. Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1–14), present results (2. Results, statements 15–16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17–18). The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在提高胃肠道(GI)内窥镜检查质量方面具有巨大潜力,但由于缺乏严格的标准化和确保通用性的开发方法,阻碍了人工智能在临床实践中的应用。诊断性内窥镜临床前人工智能研究质量评估(QUAIDE)说明和检查表旨在为消化道内窥镜临床前人工智能研究的标准化设计和报告提出建议。这些建议是在一个由 32 名内镜医师和计算机科学家组成的国际多学科专家小组达成正式共识的基础上制定的。为了就声明达成共识,采用了德尔菲法(Delphi methodology),并预先设定了 80% 的协议阈值。最多允许进行三轮投票。共就 18 项关键建议达成共识,涵盖 6 个关键领域:数据采集和注释(6 项声明)、结果报告(3 项声明)、实验设置和算法架构(4 项声明)以及结果展示和解释(5 项声明)。QUAIDE 就如何正确设计(1.方法,说明 1-14)、呈现结果(2.结果,说明 15-16)以及整合和解释所获结果(3.讨论,说明 17-18)提出了建议。QUAIDE 框架为参与消化道内窥镜人工智能临床前研究的作者、读者、编辑和审稿人提供了实用指导,旨在改进设计和报告,从而促进研究标准化,加快人工智能创新成果向临床实践的转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy. The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted. Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1–14), present results (2. Results, statements 15–16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17–18). The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gut
Gut 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
284
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Gut is a renowned international journal specializing in gastroenterology and hepatology, known for its high-quality clinical research covering the alimentary tract, liver, biliary tree, and pancreas. It offers authoritative and current coverage across all aspects of gastroenterology and hepatology, featuring articles on emerging disease mechanisms and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches authored by leading experts. As the flagship journal of BMJ's gastroenterology portfolio, Gut is accompanied by two companion journals: Frontline Gastroenterology, focusing on education and practice-oriented papers, and BMJ Open Gastroenterology for open access original research.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Differential inflammasome activation predisposes to acute-on-chronic liver failure in human and experimental cirrhosis with and without previous decompensation QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy Nuclear translocation of plasma membrane protein ADCY7 potentiates T cell-mediated antitumour immunity in HCC. Spatial single-cell profiling and neighbourhood analysis reveal the determinants of immune architecture connected to checkpoint inhibitor therapy outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. Exploring the role of genetics, gut microbiota and blood metabolites in IBD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1