{"title":"医疗人工智能需要有意义的人类参与:战争的教训","authors":"James M. Hillis, Kenneth Payne","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.</p><p>The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health AI needs meaningful human involvement: lessons from war\",\"authors\":\"James M. Hillis, Kenneth Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.</p><p>The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health AI needs meaningful human involvement: lessons from war
Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.
The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.