医疗人工智能需要有意义的人类参与:战争的教训

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Nature Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0
James M. Hillis, Kenneth Payne
{"title":"医疗人工智能需要有意义的人类参与:战争的教训","authors":"James M. Hillis, Kenneth Payne","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.</p><p>The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health AI needs meaningful human involvement: lessons from war\",\"authors\":\"James M. Hillis, Kenneth Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.</p><p>The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03311-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)不断显示出其在医疗保健领域的创新潜力。随着这种转变的发生,我们需要强有力的方法来评估人工智能何时以及如何自主运行。人工智能在医疗保健领域的可扩展性往往会与维持人类监督发生冲突,因此必须寻求适当的平衡。我们借鉴军事领域正在进行的辩论,来解释为什么有效人工智能的关键在于 "有意义的人类参与",以及实现这一目标的关键因素。然而,在权衡自主性的共同方法方面却有显著的相似之处。这两个领域的基本问题都是:"何时、如何以及由谁做出决定?这两个领域都要求对可接受的生命风险作出判断;仔细划分责任和问责;以及最终决定应给予非人类系统多少自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health AI needs meaningful human involvement: lessons from war

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to show its potential for innovation in healthcare. As this transformation occurs, robust methods are needed to assess when and how AI should function autonomously. The scalability of AI use in healthcare will often conflict with the maintenance of human oversight, and an appropriate balance must be sought. We draw on ongoing debates in the military domain to explain why the key to effective AI lies in ‘meaningful human involvement’ and key considerations in attaining it.

The goals of combat contrast sharply with the goals of healthcare. There are nonetheless salient parallels for shared approaches to weighing autonomy. The fundamental questions in both domains are, “When, how and by whom should decisions be made?”. Both arenas demand judgement of acceptable risk to life; the careful delineation of responsibility and accountability; and, ultimately, a decision about how much autonomy should be afforded to nonhuman systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Early readout shows promise of genomic newborn screening Lifestyle interventions for cardiometabolic health Genetic basis of early onset and progression of type 2 diabetes in South Asians Internet use linked to better mental health in older adults Cognitive deficits after COVID-19 associated with brain injury biomarkers and volume loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1