免疫性血小板减少症的最佳二线治疗方法是什么?

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY British Journal of Haematology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/bjh.19777
Matthieu Mahévas, James B. Bussel
{"title":"免疫性血小板减少症的最佳二线治疗方法是什么?","authors":"Matthieu Mahévas,&nbsp;James B. Bussel","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The choice between thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and anti-CD20 as the preferred second-line therapies for immune thrombocytopenia remains in the eye of the beholders. Each has major advantages and certain weaknesses. Stolz et al. describe a single-centre experience that whets our appetite for a large randomized controlled trial comparing a TPO agonist and an anti-CD20 agent.</p><p>Commentary on: Stolz et al. Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia – A single center retrospective analysis. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1121-1125.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"205 4","pages":"1267-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.19777","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the best second-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia?\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Mahévas,&nbsp;James B. Bussel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The choice between thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and anti-CD20 as the preferred second-line therapies for immune thrombocytopenia remains in the eye of the beholders. Each has major advantages and certain weaknesses. Stolz et al. describe a single-centre experience that whets our appetite for a large randomized controlled trial comparing a TPO agonist and an anti-CD20 agent.</p><p>Commentary on: Stolz et al. Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia – A single center retrospective analysis. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1121-1125.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\"205 4\",\"pages\":\"1267-1268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.19777\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为治疗免疫性血小板减少症的二线疗法,促血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA)和抗 CD20 之间的选择仍是众说纷纭。每种疗法都有其主要优势和某些弱点。Stolz等人描述了一个单中心的经验,让我们对比较TPO激动剂和抗CD20药物的大型随机对照试验产生了兴趣:Stolz et al.Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1121-1125.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the best second-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia?

The choice between thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and anti-CD20 as the preferred second-line therapies for immune thrombocytopenia remains in the eye of the beholders. Each has major advantages and certain weaknesses. Stolz et al. describe a single-centre experience that whets our appetite for a large randomized controlled trial comparing a TPO agonist and an anti-CD20 agent.

Commentary on: Stolz et al. Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia – A single center retrospective analysis. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1121-1125.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Depression, sleep and pain affect instrumental activities of daily living through cognitive functioning in adults with sickle cell disease: A report from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Are we there yet? CAR-T therapy in multiple myeloma. Rates of discordant CD20 status by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in B-ALL. EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, an entity by many names. Impaired physical ability in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia: Can regular physical activity be a countermeasure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1