在肥胖症治疗研究中,用于衡量生活质量的一套患者报告结果核心指标。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/obr.13849
Phillip J Dijkhorst, Claire E E de Vries, Caroline B Terwee, Ignace M C Janssen, Ronald S L Liem, Bart A van Wagensveld, Johan Ottosson, Bruno Halpern, Stuart W Flint, Elisabeth F C van Rossum, Alend Saadi, Lisa West-Smith, Mary O'Kane, Jason C G Halford, Karen D Coulman, Salman Al-Sabah, John B Dixon, Wendy A Brown, Ximena Ramos Salas, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Sally Abbott, Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Bernardo Rea Ruanova, John M Morton, Francois Pattou, Erman O Akpinar, Stephanie Sogg, Jacques M Himpens, Vanessa Osborne, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, J M Bernadette Keenan, Joe Nadglowski, Jacqueline Bowman, Ken Clare, Riccardo Meloni, Sandra de Blaeij, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Valerie M Monpellier
{"title":"在肥胖症治疗研究中,用于衡量生活质量的一套患者报告结果核心指标。","authors":"Phillip J Dijkhorst, Claire E E de Vries, Caroline B Terwee, Ignace M C Janssen, Ronald S L Liem, Bart A van Wagensveld, Johan Ottosson, Bruno Halpern, Stuart W Flint, Elisabeth F C van Rossum, Alend Saadi, Lisa West-Smith, Mary O'Kane, Jason C G Halford, Karen D Coulman, Salman Al-Sabah, John B Dixon, Wendy A Brown, Ximena Ramos Salas, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Sally Abbott, Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Bernardo Rea Ruanova, John M Morton, Francois Pattou, Erman O Akpinar, Stephanie Sogg, Jacques M Himpens, Vanessa Osborne, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, J M Bernadette Keenan, Joe Nadglowski, Jacqueline Bowman, Ken Clare, Riccardo Meloni, Sandra de Blaeij, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Valerie M Monpellier","doi":"10.1111/obr.13849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Core set of patient-reported outcome measures to measure quality of life in obesity treatment research.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip J Dijkhorst, Claire E E de Vries, Caroline B Terwee, Ignace M C Janssen, Ronald S L Liem, Bart A van Wagensveld, Johan Ottosson, Bruno Halpern, Stuart W Flint, Elisabeth F C van Rossum, Alend Saadi, Lisa West-Smith, Mary O'Kane, Jason C G Halford, Karen D Coulman, Salman Al-Sabah, John B Dixon, Wendy A Brown, Ximena Ramos Salas, Maarten M Hoogbergen, Sally Abbott, Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Bernardo Rea Ruanova, John M Morton, Francois Pattou, Erman O Akpinar, Stephanie Sogg, Jacques M Himpens, Vanessa Osborne, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, J M Bernadette Keenan, Joe Nadglowski, Jacqueline Bowman, Ken Clare, Riccardo Meloni, Sandra de Blaeij, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Valerie M Monpellier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于患者报告结果测量方法(PROMs)缺乏标准化,因此在肥胖症治疗研究中对生活质量(QoL)结果的测量和比较具有挑战性。本研究报告了第二届和第三届全球多学科肥胖症治疗生活质量测量标准化(S.Q.O.T.)共识会议的结果,会议确定了一套核心 PROMs,用于测量肥胖症治疗研究中先前选定的九种患者报告结果 (PROs)。S.Q.O.T. II 在线共识会议和 S.Q.O.T. III 面对面混合共识会议分别于 2021 年 10 月和 2022 年 5 月举行。会议由一位专门从事PRO测量的独立主持人主持。会议采用了名义小组技术、德尔菲练习和匿名投票等方法,以协商一致的方式选出最合适的 PROM。分别有 28 人和 27 人参加了会议,其中包括来自不同地区的肥胖症患者(PLWO)和不同学科的专家。在第一次 S.Q.O.T. 共识会议确定的 24 个 PRO 和 16 个 PROM 中,通过共识选出了以下 9 个 PRO 和 3 个 PROM:BODY-Q(身体功能、身体症状、心理功能、社会功能、饮食行为和身体形象)、IWQOL-Lite(自尊)和 QOLOS(皮肤过敏)。由于现有的 PROM 不足,因此没有选择 PROM 来测量耻辱感。结合患者和专家的意见,我们选择了一套核心 PROM 来测量肥胖治疗研究中的 QoL。这套核心指标应作为肥胖症研究中使用的最低标准,并可与临床参数相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Core set of patient-reported outcome measures to measure quality of life in obesity treatment research.

The lack of standardization in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has made measurement and comparison of quality of life (QoL) outcomes in research focused on obesity treatment challenging. This study reports on the results of the second and third global multidisciplinary Standardizing Quality of life measures in Obesity Treatment (S.Q.O.T.) consensus meetings, where a core set of PROMs to measure nine previously selected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in obesity treatment research was established. The S.Q.O.T. II online and S.Q.O.T. III face-to-face hybrid consensus meetings were held in October 2021 and May 2022. The meetings were led by an independent moderator specializing in PRO measurement. Nominal group techniques, Delphi exercises, and anonymous voting were used to select the most suitable PROMs by consensus. The meetings were attended by 28 and 27 participants, respectively, including a geographically diverse selection of people living with obesity (PLWO) and experts from various disciplines. Out of 24 PROs and 16 PROMs identified in the first S.Q.O.T. consensus meeting, the following nine PROs and three PROMs were selected via consensus: BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), IWQOL-Lite (self-esteem), and QOLOS (excess skin). No PROM was selected to measure stigma as existing PROMs deemed to be inadequate. A core set of PROMs to measure QoL in research focused on obesity treatment has been selected incorporating patients' and experts' opinions. This core set should serve as a minimum to use in obesity research studies and can be combined with clinical parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
The impact of behavioral weight management interventions on eating behavior traits in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of childhood obesity with pubertal development in boys: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in adherence to physical activity guidelines from 1997 to 2018 among adults with obesity: An analysis from the US National Health Interview Survey. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients of 70 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Valuing behavioral interventions for obesity reduction: A scoping review of economic models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1