Mahshid Golagha, Charles Hesswani, Shiva Singh, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Ali Sheikhy, Christopher Koller, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball, Ashkan A Malayeri
{"title":"使用肾脏评分系统预测手术后并发症。","authors":"Mahshid Golagha, Charles Hesswani, Shiva Singh, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Ali Sheikhy, Christopher Koller, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball, Ashkan A Malayeri","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04627-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current surgical approaches for renal malignancies primarily rely on qualitative factors such as patient preferences, surgeon experience, and hospital capabilities. Applying a quantitative method for consistent and reliable assessment of renal lesions would significantly enhance surgical decision-making and facilitate data comparison. Nephrometry scoring (NS) systems systematically evaluate and describe renal tumors based on their anatomical features. These scoring systems, including R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, MAP scores, C-index, CSA, and T-index, aim to predict surgical complications by evaluating anatomical and patient-specific factors. In this review paper, we explore the components and methodologies of these scoring systems, compare their effectiveness and limitations, and discuss their application in advancing patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting post-surgical complications using renal scoring systems.\",\"authors\":\"Mahshid Golagha, Charles Hesswani, Shiva Singh, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Ali Sheikhy, Christopher Koller, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball, Ashkan A Malayeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04627-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current surgical approaches for renal malignancies primarily rely on qualitative factors such as patient preferences, surgeon experience, and hospital capabilities. Applying a quantitative method for consistent and reliable assessment of renal lesions would significantly enhance surgical decision-making and facilitate data comparison. Nephrometry scoring (NS) systems systematically evaluate and describe renal tumors based on their anatomical features. These scoring systems, including R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, MAP scores, C-index, CSA, and T-index, aim to predict surgical complications by evaluating anatomical and patient-specific factors. In this review paper, we explore the components and methodologies of these scoring systems, compare their effectiveness and limitations, and discuss their application in advancing patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04627-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04627-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前治疗肾脏恶性肿瘤的手术方法主要依赖于病人的喜好、外科医生的经验和医院的能力等定性因素。采用定量方法对肾脏病变进行一致、可靠的评估,将大大提高手术决策水平,并有助于数据比较。肾功能评分(NS)系统根据解剖学特征对肾肿瘤进行系统评估和描述。这些评分系统包括 R.E.N.A.L.、PADUA、MAP 评分、C 指数、CSA 和 T 指数,旨在通过评估解剖和患者特异性因素来预测手术并发症。在这篇综述论文中,我们探讨了这些评分系统的组成部分和方法,比较了它们的有效性和局限性,并讨论了它们在促进患者护理和优化手术效果方面的应用。
Predicting post-surgical complications using renal scoring systems.
Current surgical approaches for renal malignancies primarily rely on qualitative factors such as patient preferences, surgeon experience, and hospital capabilities. Applying a quantitative method for consistent and reliable assessment of renal lesions would significantly enhance surgical decision-making and facilitate data comparison. Nephrometry scoring (NS) systems systematically evaluate and describe renal tumors based on their anatomical features. These scoring systems, including R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, MAP scores, C-index, CSA, and T-index, aim to predict surgical complications by evaluating anatomical and patient-specific factors. In this review paper, we explore the components and methodologies of these scoring systems, compare their effectiveness and limitations, and discuss their application in advancing patient care and optimizing surgical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits