1 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素泵与糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险:四十年来的长期趋势

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1089/dia.2024.0272
Dalton R Budhram, Priya Bapat, Abdulmohsen Bakhsh, Mohammad I Abuabat, Natasha J Verhoeff, Doug Mumford, Wajeeha Cheema, Andrej Orszag, Akshay Jain, David Z I Cherney, Michael Fralick, Bader N Alamri, Alanna Weisman, Leif Erik Lovblom, Bruce A Perkins
{"title":"1 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素泵与糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险:四十年来的长期趋势","authors":"Dalton R Budhram, Priya Bapat, Abdulmohsen Bakhsh, Mohammad I Abuabat, Natasha J Verhoeff, Doug Mumford, Wajeeha Cheema, Andrej Orszag, Akshay Jain, David Z I Cherney, Michael Fralick, Bader N Alamri, Alanna Weisman, Leif Erik Lovblom, Bruce A Perkins","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in type 1 diabetes has been regarded as a major diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) risk factor. We aimed to determine secular trends in risk since CSII implementation in the 1980s. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> We assessed the relationship between time-varying CSII use and DKA events from 1983 to 2017 and by each decade in the 1441 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study participants using crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Time-varying CSII exposure was associated with significantly higher DKA risk in the 1980s (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-10.29; <i>P</i> < 0.001), but in the 2010s, this risk was not significantly elevated (adjusted HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.73-2.12; <i>P</i> = 0.43). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> DKA risk associated with CSII in type 1 diabetes has declined substantially since the 1980s such that the remaining risk in the past decade appears to be of low magnitude.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insulin Pump Use and Diabetic Ketoacidosis Risk in Type 1 Diabetes: Secular Trends over Four Decades.\",\"authors\":\"Dalton R Budhram, Priya Bapat, Abdulmohsen Bakhsh, Mohammad I Abuabat, Natasha J Verhoeff, Doug Mumford, Wajeeha Cheema, Andrej Orszag, Akshay Jain, David Z I Cherney, Michael Fralick, Bader N Alamri, Alanna Weisman, Leif Erik Lovblom, Bruce A Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2024.0272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in type 1 diabetes has been regarded as a major diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) risk factor. We aimed to determine secular trends in risk since CSII implementation in the 1980s. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> We assessed the relationship between time-varying CSII use and DKA events from 1983 to 2017 and by each decade in the 1441 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study participants using crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Time-varying CSII exposure was associated with significantly higher DKA risk in the 1980s (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-10.29; <i>P</i> < 0.001), but in the 2010s, this risk was not significantly elevated (adjusted HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.73-2.12; <i>P</i> = 0.43). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> DKA risk associated with CSII in type 1 diabetes has declined substantially since the 1980s such that the remaining risk in the past decade appears to be of low magnitude.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:1 型糖尿病患者持续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)一直被认为是糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的主要风险因素。我们旨在确定自 20 世纪 80 年代实施 CSII 以来风险的长期趋势。研究设计与方法:我们使用粗略和调整后的 Cox 比例危险模型,评估了从 1983 年到 2017 年以及每个十年间 1441 名糖尿病控制和并发症试验/糖尿病干预和并发症流行病学研究参与者中 CSII 使用与 DKA 事件之间的时变关系。结果在20世纪80年代,随时间变化的CSII暴露与较高的DKA风险显著相关(调整后危险比[HR]5.81;95%置信区间[CI]3.28-10.29;P < 0.001),但在2010年代,这一风险没有显著升高(调整后危险比1.24;95%置信区间0.73-2.12;P = 0.43)。结论自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,与 CSII 相关的 1 型糖尿病 DKA 风险已大幅下降,因此过去十年中剩余的风险似乎较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insulin Pump Use and Diabetic Ketoacidosis Risk in Type 1 Diabetes: Secular Trends over Four Decades.

Introduction: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in type 1 diabetes has been regarded as a major diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) risk factor. We aimed to determine secular trends in risk since CSII implementation in the 1980s. Research Design and Methods: We assessed the relationship between time-varying CSII use and DKA events from 1983 to 2017 and by each decade in the 1441 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study participants using crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Time-varying CSII exposure was associated with significantly higher DKA risk in the 1980s (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-10.29; P < 0.001), but in the 2010s, this risk was not significantly elevated (adjusted HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.73-2.12; P = 0.43). Conclusions: DKA risk associated with CSII in type 1 diabetes has declined substantially since the 1980s such that the remaining risk in the past decade appears to be of low magnitude.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring to Support a Carbohydrate-Restricted Nutrition Intervention in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Comparison of Computational Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data with a Reference Software, "Ambulatory Glucose Profile," in Type 1 Diabetes. Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. Evaluation of an Automated Priming Bolus for Improving Prandial Glucose Control in Full Closed Loop Delivery. Safe Options for the Treatment of Mothers and Babies with Pregestational Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1