频闪镜检查时游离边缘粘膜波动态评估量表:临床验证研究和结果分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08975-5
Walter Tenesaca Pintado, Roberto Fernández Baillo, Isabel Cardoso Lopez, Ángel Rodriguez Paramas, Alfredo Martínez Martínez
{"title":"频闪镜检查时游离边缘粘膜波动态评估量表:临床验证研究和结果分析。","authors":"Walter Tenesaca Pintado, Roberto Fernández Baillo, Isabel Cardoso Lopez, Ángel Rodriguez Paramas, Alfredo Martínez Martínez","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08975-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying the mucosal wave (MW) is essential when studying the voice; however, its characterization and perceived measurement during laryngeal stroboscopy (LS) are not well defined or standardized because of the subjectivity of its interpretation. This article proposed and validated a scale that characterized and approximated MW measurement during LS, applied it to participants divided into a healthy group and groups with free edge conditions, and identified differences between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive and clinical validation study of the \"VASQ (Vertical axis, Anteroposterior axis, Symmetry and Quantity) mucosal wave score\" scale based on stroboscopy images of 137 adult men and women divided into a control group and functional and organic pathology groups. The images were analyzed by three evaluators according to an established protocol. Measurements dictating the reproducibility and validity criteria as well as the MW score in each group were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the scale was α = 0.90, internal consistency success rate was 91%, intra-observer reliability was 0.83, inter-observer reliability was 0.83, content validity coefficient was 0.92, and factor loading was 0.37-0.53. The MW total score values between 5 and 6 were established as a reference for normality (P < 0.05). Organic pathology showed lower MW score values (P < 0.05), and functional pathology to a lesser extent (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed scale is a consistent, valid, and reliable tool. Its widespread application would favor commonly used terminology and facilitate quantitative comparisons in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale for the assessment of mucosal wave dynamics of the free edges during stroboscopic examination: clinical validation study and analysis of results.\",\"authors\":\"Walter Tenesaca Pintado, Roberto Fernández Baillo, Isabel Cardoso Lopez, Ángel Rodriguez Paramas, Alfredo Martínez Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08975-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying the mucosal wave (MW) is essential when studying the voice; however, its characterization and perceived measurement during laryngeal stroboscopy (LS) are not well defined or standardized because of the subjectivity of its interpretation. This article proposed and validated a scale that characterized and approximated MW measurement during LS, applied it to participants divided into a healthy group and groups with free edge conditions, and identified differences between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive and clinical validation study of the \\\"VASQ (Vertical axis, Anteroposterior axis, Symmetry and Quantity) mucosal wave score\\\" scale based on stroboscopy images of 137 adult men and women divided into a control group and functional and organic pathology groups. The images were analyzed by three evaluators according to an established protocol. Measurements dictating the reproducibility and validity criteria as well as the MW score in each group were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reliability of the scale was α = 0.90, internal consistency success rate was 91%, intra-observer reliability was 0.83, inter-observer reliability was 0.83, content validity coefficient was 0.92, and factor loading was 0.37-0.53. The MW total score values between 5 and 6 were established as a reference for normality (P < 0.05). Organic pathology showed lower MW score values (P < 0.05), and functional pathology to a lesser extent (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed scale is a consistent, valid, and reliable tool. Its widespread application would favor commonly used terminology and facilitate quantitative comparisons in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08975-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08975-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在研究嗓音时,识别粘膜波(MW)至关重要;然而,由于解释的主观性,喉频闪镜(LS)检查中的粘膜波特征和感知测量并没有得到很好的定义或标准化。本文提出并验证了一种量表,用于描述和近似测量 LS 期间的嗓音强度,将其应用于健康组和自由边缘条件组的参与者,并确定了两者之间的差异:这是一项对 "VASQ(垂直轴、前后轴、对称性和数量)粘膜波评分 "量表的描述性和临床验证研究,该量表基于 137 名成年男性和女性的频闪仪图像,分为对照组、功能性和器质性病变组。图像由三名评估人员按照既定方案进行分析。结果显示,该量表的信度为α,有效度为α,无误度为α:量表的信度为α = 0.90,内部一致性成功率为91%,观察者内部信度为0.83,观察者之间信度为0.83,内容效度系数为0.92,因子负荷为0.37-0.53。MW 总分值在 5 和 6 之间,可作为正态性参考(P 0.05):结论:提议的量表是一个一致、有效和可靠的工具。它的广泛应用将有利于常用术语的使用,并有助于未来研究中的定量比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scale for the assessment of mucosal wave dynamics of the free edges during stroboscopic examination: clinical validation study and analysis of results.

Introduction: Identifying the mucosal wave (MW) is essential when studying the voice; however, its characterization and perceived measurement during laryngeal stroboscopy (LS) are not well defined or standardized because of the subjectivity of its interpretation. This article proposed and validated a scale that characterized and approximated MW measurement during LS, applied it to participants divided into a healthy group and groups with free edge conditions, and identified differences between them.

Methods: This is a descriptive and clinical validation study of the "VASQ (Vertical axis, Anteroposterior axis, Symmetry and Quantity) mucosal wave score" scale based on stroboscopy images of 137 adult men and women divided into a control group and functional and organic pathology groups. The images were analyzed by three evaluators according to an established protocol. Measurements dictating the reproducibility and validity criteria as well as the MW score in each group were obtained.

Results: The reliability of the scale was α = 0.90, internal consistency success rate was 91%, intra-observer reliability was 0.83, inter-observer reliability was 0.83, content validity coefficient was 0.92, and factor loading was 0.37-0.53. The MW total score values between 5 and 6 were established as a reference for normality (P < 0.05). Organic pathology showed lower MW score values (P < 0.05), and functional pathology to a lesser extent (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: The proposed scale is a consistent, valid, and reliable tool. Its widespread application would favor commonly used terminology and facilitate quantitative comparisons in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: A novel olfactory sorting task. Scale for the assessment of mucosal wave dynamics of the free edges during stroboscopic examination: clinical validation study and analysis of results. Drug induced sleep endoscopy and simultaneous polysomnography to predict the effectiveness of mandibular advancement device in obstructive sleep apnea treatment. AI in oncology: comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of claude 3 opus and ChatGPT 4.0 in HNSCC management. Effect of performance status on the therapeutic effect of nivolumab in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1