Ali Alipouriani, Kamil Erozkan, Lucas Schabl, Himani Sancheti, Shaji Sebastian, Serre-Yu Wong, Phil Tozer, Benjamin L Cohen, Stefan D Holubar
{"title":"TOpClass 4 级会阴克罗恩病:克罗恩病患者直肠切除术后会阴伤口并发症的系统性回顾和元分析。","authors":"Ali Alipouriani, Kamil Erozkan, Lucas Schabl, Himani Sancheti, Shaji Sebastian, Serre-Yu Wong, Phil Tozer, Benjamin L Cohen, Stefan D Holubar","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonhealing perineal wounds have been reported to be common after proctectomy for Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of perineal wound healing after proctectomy for CD and assessed the risk factors for nonhealing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2023, and articles reporting perineal wound healing rates after proctectomy for CD were included. Data on study characteristics and proportion of healed wounds, and risk factors, were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion and 95% CIs using the \"meta\" package in R. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 501 articles, of which 252 remained after de-duplication. After screening, 4 retrospective cohort studies involving 333 patients were included. Across the 4 studies, the pooled proportion of completely healed perineal wounds at 6 months was 65% (95% CI 52%-80%), and 70% (95% CI 60%-83%) at 12 months. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 86% at 6 months). Three studies examined risk factors for impaired healing after proctectomy. One study identified preoperative perineal sepsis as the only independent factor associated with impaired healing (P = .001) on multivariable analysis. In 1 study, male sex, shorter time from diversion to proctectomy, and higher preoperative C-reactive protein levels were all associated with delayed healing in univariate analysis. Another study found that close rectal dissection was associated with significantly lower healing rates than total mesorectal excision (P = .01). Prior use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors was not associated with wound healing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed complete perineal healing in only 70% of patients 12 months after proctectomy for CD. This highlights knowledge gaps, including the identification of modifiable risk factors and methods for preventing or as rescue therapy, such as vacuum-assisted closure and flap reconstruction, for nonhealing perineal wounds after proctectomy for CD. Poor perineal wound healing outcomes are likely related to imperfectly understood underlying inflammatory dysregulation and systemically impaired wound healing in patients with CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOpClass Class 4 Perineal Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perineal Wound Complication After Proctectomy in Crohn's Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Alipouriani, Kamil Erozkan, Lucas Schabl, Himani Sancheti, Shaji Sebastian, Serre-Yu Wong, Phil Tozer, Benjamin L Cohen, Stefan D Holubar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izae198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonhealing perineal wounds have been reported to be common after proctectomy for Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of perineal wound healing after proctectomy for CD and assessed the risk factors for nonhealing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2023, and articles reporting perineal wound healing rates after proctectomy for CD were included. Data on study characteristics and proportion of healed wounds, and risk factors, were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion and 95% CIs using the \\\"meta\\\" package in R. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 501 articles, of which 252 remained after de-duplication. After screening, 4 retrospective cohort studies involving 333 patients were included. Across the 4 studies, the pooled proportion of completely healed perineal wounds at 6 months was 65% (95% CI 52%-80%), and 70% (95% CI 60%-83%) at 12 months. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 86% at 6 months). Three studies examined risk factors for impaired healing after proctectomy. One study identified preoperative perineal sepsis as the only independent factor associated with impaired healing (P = .001) on multivariable analysis. In 1 study, male sex, shorter time from diversion to proctectomy, and higher preoperative C-reactive protein levels were all associated with delayed healing in univariate analysis. Another study found that close rectal dissection was associated with significantly lower healing rates than total mesorectal excision (P = .01). Prior use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors was not associated with wound healing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed complete perineal healing in only 70% of patients 12 months after proctectomy for CD. This highlights knowledge gaps, including the identification of modifiable risk factors and methods for preventing or as rescue therapy, such as vacuum-assisted closure and flap reconstruction, for nonhealing perineal wounds after proctectomy for CD. Poor perineal wound healing outcomes are likely related to imperfectly understood underlying inflammatory dysregulation and systemically impaired wound healing in patients with CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:据报道,克罗恩病(CD)直肠切除术后会阴伤口不愈合的情况很常见。我们对克罗恩病直肠切除术后会阴伤口愈合情况进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,并评估了伤口不愈合的风险因素:方法:在PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库中对2010年至2023年的文献进行了全面检索,纳入了报道CD直肠切除术后会阴伤口愈合率的文章。提取了有关研究特征、愈合伤口比例和风险因素的数据。使用 R 中的 "meta "软件包进行随机效应荟萃分析,以估计汇总比例和 95% CIs:我们确定了 501 篇文章,其中 252 篇文章经过去重后保留了下来。经过筛选,共纳入了 4 项涉及 333 名患者的回顾性队列研究。在这 4 项研究中,会阴伤口在 6 个月完全愈合的总比例为 65%(95% CI 52%-80%),在 12 个月完全愈合的总比例为 70%(95% CI 60%-83%)。不同研究之间存在显著的异质性(6 个月时 I2 = 86%)。三项研究探讨了直肠切除术后愈合受损的风险因素。一项研究发现,术前会阴部败血症是多变量分析中唯一与愈合受损相关的独立因素(P = .001)。在一项研究中,男性性别、从转流到直肠切除术的时间较短以及术前 C 反应蛋白水平较高都与单变量分析中的延迟愈合有关。另一项研究发现,直肠近端切除术的愈合率明显低于全直肠系膜切除术(P = .01)。之前使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂与伤口愈合结果无关:这项荟萃分析显示,只有 70% 的 CD 患者在直肠切除术后 12 个月会阴部完全愈合。这凸显了知识差距,包括确定可改变的风险因素和预防方法,或作为CD直肠切除术后会阴伤口不愈合的挽救疗法,如真空辅助闭合和皮瓣重建。会阴伤口愈合不良很可能与人们对 CD 患者潜在的炎症失调和系统性伤口愈合受损的不完全了解有关。
TOpClass Class 4 Perineal Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perineal Wound Complication After Proctectomy in Crohn's Patients.
Background: Nonhealing perineal wounds have been reported to be common after proctectomy for Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of perineal wound healing after proctectomy for CD and assessed the risk factors for nonhealing.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2023, and articles reporting perineal wound healing rates after proctectomy for CD were included. Data on study characteristics and proportion of healed wounds, and risk factors, were extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled proportion and 95% CIs using the "meta" package in R. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results: We identified 501 articles, of which 252 remained after de-duplication. After screening, 4 retrospective cohort studies involving 333 patients were included. Across the 4 studies, the pooled proportion of completely healed perineal wounds at 6 months was 65% (95% CI 52%-80%), and 70% (95% CI 60%-83%) at 12 months. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 86% at 6 months). Three studies examined risk factors for impaired healing after proctectomy. One study identified preoperative perineal sepsis as the only independent factor associated with impaired healing (P = .001) on multivariable analysis. In 1 study, male sex, shorter time from diversion to proctectomy, and higher preoperative C-reactive protein levels were all associated with delayed healing in univariate analysis. Another study found that close rectal dissection was associated with significantly lower healing rates than total mesorectal excision (P = .01). Prior use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors was not associated with wound healing outcomes.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis revealed complete perineal healing in only 70% of patients 12 months after proctectomy for CD. This highlights knowledge gaps, including the identification of modifiable risk factors and methods for preventing or as rescue therapy, such as vacuum-assisted closure and flap reconstruction, for nonhealing perineal wounds after proctectomy for CD. Poor perineal wound healing outcomes are likely related to imperfectly understood underlying inflammatory dysregulation and systemically impaired wound healing in patients with CD.
期刊介绍:
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.