交接与公平:病人分配模式对黑人病人交接的影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6
Ethan Molitch-Hou, Thomas J Best, Ellis Green, Khanh T Nguyen, Grace LaShore, Matthew T Cerasale
{"title":"交接与公平:病人分配模式对黑人病人交接的影响。","authors":"Ethan Molitch-Hou, Thomas J Best, Ellis Green, Khanh T Nguyen, Grace LaShore, Matthew T Cerasale","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital medicine patient distribution models (PDM) assign patients to inpatient services on hospital admission. Models balance tradeoffs including patient handoffs, physician wellness, subspecialty care, and other factors to ensure optimal outcomes; however, equity is rarely considered. Handoffs during inpatient care can result in medical error and worse patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a PDM that prioritizes use of specialty care services and an overflow service (OS) during high census on racial inequities in handoff frequency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient encounters on hospital medicine services from July 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. The primary exposures included being discharged by a general medicine service (GMS) or cared for by an OS. The primary outcome was handoffs per day of stay, analyzed by multivariable regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, discharge from GMS, and care from OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4165 inpatient hospitalizations with the majority of their stay on a hospital medicine service were reviewed. Patients discharged by GMS (78.2% vs. 58.1%, p < .001) and cared for by OS (78.7% vs. 67.0%, p < .001) were more likely to identify as Black. Multivariable analysis showed a handoff risk ratio of 1.53 (p < .001) for OS patients and 1.06 (p = .01) if discharged from GMS, but race alone did not significantly affect risk of handoffs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PDM prioritization drove increased handoffs disproportionately for Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that race alone did not contribute to increased handoffs suggesting the creation of a systemic bias in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handoffs and Equity: Impact of a Patient Distribution Model on Handoffs for Black Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Molitch-Hou, Thomas J Best, Ellis Green, Khanh T Nguyen, Grace LaShore, Matthew T Cerasale\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital medicine patient distribution models (PDM) assign patients to inpatient services on hospital admission. Models balance tradeoffs including patient handoffs, physician wellness, subspecialty care, and other factors to ensure optimal outcomes; however, equity is rarely considered. Handoffs during inpatient care can result in medical error and worse patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a PDM that prioritizes use of specialty care services and an overflow service (OS) during high census on racial inequities in handoff frequency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient encounters on hospital medicine services from July 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. The primary exposures included being discharged by a general medicine service (GMS) or cared for by an OS. The primary outcome was handoffs per day of stay, analyzed by multivariable regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, discharge from GMS, and care from OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4165 inpatient hospitalizations with the majority of their stay on a hospital medicine service were reviewed. Patients discharged by GMS (78.2% vs. 58.1%, p < .001) and cared for by OS (78.7% vs. 67.0%, p < .001) were more likely to identify as Black. Multivariable analysis showed a handoff risk ratio of 1.53 (p < .001) for OS patients and 1.06 (p = .01) if discharged from GMS, but race alone did not significantly affect risk of handoffs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PDM prioritization drove increased handoffs disproportionately for Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that race alone did not contribute to increased handoffs suggesting the creation of a systemic bias in patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院医学病人分配模式(PDM)在病人入院时为其分配住院服务。该模型平衡了各种权衡因素,其中包括病人交接、医生健康、亚专科护理和其他因素,以确保最佳治疗效果;但很少考虑公平性。住院治疗期间的交接班可能会导致医疗失误和更糟糕的患者预后。本研究评估了优先使用专科护理服务的 PDM 和高人口密度时的分流服务(OS)对移交频率种族不平等的影响:对 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月期间医院医疗服务的住院病人就诊情况进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。主要暴露包括由普通内科服务(GMS)出院或由操作系统护理。主要结果是住院期间每天的交接,通过多变量回归进行分析,并对年龄、性别、种族、民族、保险、GMS出院和OS护理进行调整:共审查了 4165 名住院病人,其中大部分住院时间是在医院医疗服务部门度过的。由 GMS 出院的患者占 78.2%,由 OS 出院的患者占 58.1%:PDM 优先排序导致黑人患者的出院率不成比例地上升。多变量分析表明,种族本身并不会导致交接率增加,这表明在患者护理中存在系统性偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Handoffs and Equity: Impact of a Patient Distribution Model on Handoffs for Black Patients.

Background: Hospital medicine patient distribution models (PDM) assign patients to inpatient services on hospital admission. Models balance tradeoffs including patient handoffs, physician wellness, subspecialty care, and other factors to ensure optimal outcomes; however, equity is rarely considered. Handoffs during inpatient care can result in medical error and worse patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a PDM that prioritizes use of specialty care services and an overflow service (OS) during high census on racial inequities in handoff frequency.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient encounters on hospital medicine services from July 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. The primary exposures included being discharged by a general medicine service (GMS) or cared for by an OS. The primary outcome was handoffs per day of stay, analyzed by multivariable regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, discharge from GMS, and care from OS.

Results: A total of 4165 inpatient hospitalizations with the majority of their stay on a hospital medicine service were reviewed. Patients discharged by GMS (78.2% vs. 58.1%, p < .001) and cared for by OS (78.7% vs. 67.0%, p < .001) were more likely to identify as Black. Multivariable analysis showed a handoff risk ratio of 1.53 (p < .001) for OS patients and 1.06 (p = .01) if discharged from GMS, but race alone did not significantly affect risk of handoffs.

Conclusion: The PDM prioritization drove increased handoffs disproportionately for Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that race alone did not contribute to increased handoffs suggesting the creation of a systemic bias in patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Usage at a Large Pediatric Academic Institution. Intersecting Epidemics: Examining the Impact of Internalized Homophobia and Depression Symptoms on HIV Testing Through a Suicide Syndemic Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. Socioeconomic Status, Social Support, and Quality of Life Among Black Adults. Bridging the Gap: Culturally Responsive Strategies for NIH Trial Recruitment. A Review of the Public Health Literature Examining the Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Race/Ethnicity on Health Outcomes in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1