采用阈下微脉冲激光疗法治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的视力预后因素。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Lasers in Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s10103-024-04207-8
Ying Huang, Guang Li, Lina Ge, Bing Lin
{"title":"采用阈下微脉冲激光疗法治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的视力预后因素。","authors":"Ying Huang, Guang Li, Lina Ge, Bing Lin","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04207-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analyze the prognostic factors of visual outcome in central serous choriretinopathy (CSC) treated with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy through the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations. It was a retrospective clinical study. We collected the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations of CSC patients who received SML treatment, including visual acuity (VA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of macular. Eyes were divided into two groups according the change of central macular thickness (CMT) before and one month after SML: CMT improvement and CMT deterioration group; divided into three groups according the change of VA: VA improvement, VA stability and VA decline group. Seventy-eight patients (eighty-three eyes) were enrolled. The baseline CMT was 339.83 ± 115.72 μm, and the baseline VA was 0.43 ± 0.36. One month after SML, CMT was 281.13 ± 121.48 μm, had a significant statistical improvement (p = 0.000); and VA was 0.46 + 0.42, had no significant statistical difference compared to baseline VA (p = 0.114). CMT of sixty-three eyes (75.90%) declined, and twenty eyes (24.10%) increased; VA of thirty-one eyes (37.35%) improved, fourteen eyes (16.87%) remained unchanged, and thirty-eight eyes (45.78%) declined. CMT and VA of twenty-seven eyes (32.53%) were both improved, and eleven eyes (13.25%) were both deteriorated. VA one month after SML was statistically correlated with age (p = 0.000), baseline VA (p = 0.000), and baseline CMT (P = 0.002). CMT and VA both improved one month after SML, and the improvement of CMT was more significant than VA. Elder age and poorer baseline vision indicated poorer VA one month after SML, while higher baseline CMT indicated better VA one month after SML.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic factors of visual outcome in central serous chorioretinopathy treated with subthreshold micropulse laser therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Huang, Guang Li, Lina Ge, Bing Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-024-04207-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Analyze the prognostic factors of visual outcome in central serous choriretinopathy (CSC) treated with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy through the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations. It was a retrospective clinical study. We collected the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations of CSC patients who received SML treatment, including visual acuity (VA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of macular. Eyes were divided into two groups according the change of central macular thickness (CMT) before and one month after SML: CMT improvement and CMT deterioration group; divided into three groups according the change of VA: VA improvement, VA stability and VA decline group. Seventy-eight patients (eighty-three eyes) were enrolled. The baseline CMT was 339.83 ± 115.72 μm, and the baseline VA was 0.43 ± 0.36. One month after SML, CMT was 281.13 ± 121.48 μm, had a significant statistical improvement (p = 0.000); and VA was 0.46 + 0.42, had no significant statistical difference compared to baseline VA (p = 0.114). CMT of sixty-three eyes (75.90%) declined, and twenty eyes (24.10%) increased; VA of thirty-one eyes (37.35%) improved, fourteen eyes (16.87%) remained unchanged, and thirty-eight eyes (45.78%) declined. CMT and VA of twenty-seven eyes (32.53%) were both improved, and eleven eyes (13.25%) were both deteriorated. VA one month after SML was statistically correlated with age (p = 0.000), baseline VA (p = 0.000), and baseline CMT (P = 0.002). CMT and VA both improved one month after SML, and the improvement of CMT was more significant than VA. Elder age and poorer baseline vision indicated poorer VA one month after SML, while higher baseline CMT indicated better VA one month after SML.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04207-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04207-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过最基本的病史和临床检查,分析中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)患者接受阈下微脉冲激光(SML)治疗后的视力预后因素。这是一项回顾性临床研究。我们收集了接受 SML 治疗的 CSC 患者最基本的病史和临床检查,包括视力(VA)和黄斑光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)。根据SML治疗前和治疗后一个月黄斑中心厚度(CMT)的变化将患者分为两组:根据 VA 的变化分为三组:根据视力变化分为三组:视力改善组、视力稳定组和视力下降组。共有 78 名患者(83 只眼睛)入组。基线 CMT 为 339.83 ± 115.72 μm,基线 VA 为 0.43 ± 0.36。SML 一个月后,CMT 为 281.13 ± 121.48 μm,有显著统计学改善(p = 0.000);VA 为 0.46 + 0.42,与基线 VA 相比无显著统计学差异(p = 0.114)。63只眼睛(75.90%)的CMT下降,20只眼睛(24.10%)的CMT上升;31只眼睛(37.35%)的VA改善,14只眼睛(16.87%)保持不变,38只眼睛(45.78%)的VA下降。有 27 只眼睛(32.53%)的 CMT 和视力均有所改善,有 11 只眼睛(13.25%)的 CMT 和视力均有所恶化。SML 后一个月的视力与年龄(P = 0.000)、基线视力(P = 0.000)和基线 CMT(P = 0.002)呈统计学相关。SML一个月后,CMT和VA均有改善,且CMT的改善比VA更显著。年龄越大、基线视力越差,表明 SML 后一个月的视力越差,而基线 CMT 越高,表明 SML 后一个月的视力越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic factors of visual outcome in central serous chorioretinopathy treated with subthreshold micropulse laser therapy.

Analyze the prognostic factors of visual outcome in central serous choriretinopathy (CSC) treated with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy through the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations. It was a retrospective clinical study. We collected the most fundamental medical history and clinical examinations of CSC patients who received SML treatment, including visual acuity (VA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of macular. Eyes were divided into two groups according the change of central macular thickness (CMT) before and one month after SML: CMT improvement and CMT deterioration group; divided into three groups according the change of VA: VA improvement, VA stability and VA decline group. Seventy-eight patients (eighty-three eyes) were enrolled. The baseline CMT was 339.83 ± 115.72 μm, and the baseline VA was 0.43 ± 0.36. One month after SML, CMT was 281.13 ± 121.48 μm, had a significant statistical improvement (p = 0.000); and VA was 0.46 + 0.42, had no significant statistical difference compared to baseline VA (p = 0.114). CMT of sixty-three eyes (75.90%) declined, and twenty eyes (24.10%) increased; VA of thirty-one eyes (37.35%) improved, fourteen eyes (16.87%) remained unchanged, and thirty-eight eyes (45.78%) declined. CMT and VA of twenty-seven eyes (32.53%) were both improved, and eleven eyes (13.25%) were both deteriorated. VA one month after SML was statistically correlated with age (p = 0.000), baseline VA (p = 0.000), and baseline CMT (P = 0.002). CMT and VA both improved one month after SML, and the improvement of CMT was more significant than VA. Elder age and poorer baseline vision indicated poorer VA one month after SML, while higher baseline CMT indicated better VA one month after SML.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
期刊最新文献
Effects of femtosecond laser on hard dental tissues: A scoping review. Comparative evaluation of healing using Er, Cr: YSGG laser treatment with conventional method after extraction of permanent teeth: an in-vivo study. Photobiomodulation in recurrent aphthous stomatitis management using three different laser wavelengths. A randomized clinical trial. Effect of photobiomodulation and corticopuncture methods on tooth displacement and gene expression: animal study. Diabetic rats skin wounds treated with heterologous fibrin sealant followed by photobiomodulation therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1