术中 "太空服 "并不能减少肩关节置换术中的假体周围关节感染。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0098.R1
Adam Stoneham, Peter Poon, Marc Hirner, Christopher Frampton, Ryan Gao
{"title":"术中 \"太空服 \"并不能减少肩关节置换术中的假体周围关节感染。","authors":"Adam Stoneham, Peter Poon, Marc Hirner, Christopher Frampton, Ryan Gao","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0098.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Body exhaust suits or surgical helmet systems (colloquially, 'space suits') are frequently used in many forms of arthroplasty, with the aim of providing personal protection to surgeons and, perhaps, reducing periprosthetic joint infections, although this has not consistently been borne out in systematic reviews and registry studies. To date, no large-scale study has investigated whether this is applicable to shoulder arthroplasty. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry to assess whether the use of surgical helmet systems was associated with lower all-cause revision or revision for deep infection in primary shoulder arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 16,000 shoulder arthroplasties (hemiarthroplasties, anatomical, and reverse geometry prostheses) recorded on the New Zealand Joint Registry from its inception in 2000 to the present day. We assessed patient factors including age, BMI, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, as well as whether or not the operation took place in a laminar flow operating theatre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,728 operations (17%) took place using surgical helmet systems. Patient cohorts were broadly similar in terms of indication for surgery (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures) and medical comorbidities (age and sex). There were 842 revisions (5% of cases) with just 98 for deep infection (0.6% of all cases or 11.6% of the revisions). There were no differences in all-cause revisions or revision for deep infection between the surgical helmet systems and conventional gowns (p = 0.893 and p = 0.911, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence that wearing a surgical helmet system reduces the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection in any kind of primary shoulder arthroplasty. We acknowledge the limitations of this registry study and accept that there may be other benefits in terms of personal protection, comfort, or visibility. However, given their financial and ecological footprint, they should be used judiciously in shoulder surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 10","pages":"894-897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative 'space suits' do not reduce periprosthetic joint infections in shoulder arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Stoneham, Peter Poon, Marc Hirner, Christopher Frampton, Ryan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0098.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Body exhaust suits or surgical helmet systems (colloquially, 'space suits') are frequently used in many forms of arthroplasty, with the aim of providing personal protection to surgeons and, perhaps, reducing periprosthetic joint infections, although this has not consistently been borne out in systematic reviews and registry studies. To date, no large-scale study has investigated whether this is applicable to shoulder arthroplasty. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry to assess whether the use of surgical helmet systems was associated with lower all-cause revision or revision for deep infection in primary shoulder arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 16,000 shoulder arthroplasties (hemiarthroplasties, anatomical, and reverse geometry prostheses) recorded on the New Zealand Joint Registry from its inception in 2000 to the present day. We assessed patient factors including age, BMI, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, as well as whether or not the operation took place in a laminar flow operating theatre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,728 operations (17%) took place using surgical helmet systems. Patient cohorts were broadly similar in terms of indication for surgery (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures) and medical comorbidities (age and sex). There were 842 revisions (5% of cases) with just 98 for deep infection (0.6% of all cases or 11.6% of the revisions). There were no differences in all-cause revisions or revision for deep infection between the surgical helmet systems and conventional gowns (p = 0.893 and p = 0.911, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found no evidence that wearing a surgical helmet system reduces the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection in any kind of primary shoulder arthroplasty. We acknowledge the limitations of this registry study and accept that there may be other benefits in terms of personal protection, comfort, or visibility. However, given their financial and ecological footprint, they should be used judiciously in shoulder surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 10\",\"pages\":\"894-897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11479769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0098.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0098.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人体排气服或手术头盔系统(俗称 "太空服")经常用于多种形式的关节置换术,目的是为外科医生提供个人保护,或许还能减少假体周围关节感染,但系统回顾和登记研究并未证实这一点。迄今为止,还没有大规模的研究调查过这一观点是否适用于肩关节置换术。我们利用新西兰关节登记处来评估手术头盔系统的使用是否与初级肩关节置换术中较低的全因翻修率或深部感染翻修率有关:我们分析了新西兰关节登记处自2000年成立至今记录的16000例肩关节置换术(半关节置换术、解剖型和反向几何假体)。我们评估了患者因素,包括年龄、体重指数、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)等级以及手术是否在层流手术室进行:共有 2,728 例手术(17%)使用了手术头盔系统。患者群体在手术适应症(骨关节炎、类风湿性关节炎、骨折)和合并症(年龄和性别)方面大致相似。共有842例翻修手术(占病例总数的5%),其中98例因深度感染而翻修(占病例总数的0.6%或翻修次数的11.6%)。手术头盔系统和传统手术衣在全因翻修率和深部感染翻修率方面没有差异(分别为 p = 0.893 和 p = 0.911):我们没有发现任何证据表明佩戴手术头盔系统可以降低任何一种初次肩关节置换术的假体周围感染发生率。我们承认这项登记研究存在局限性,并承认佩戴头盔可能会在个人保护、舒适度或能见度方面带来其他益处。但是,考虑到其对经济和生态环境的影响,在肩关节手术中应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intraoperative 'space suits' do not reduce periprosthetic joint infections in shoulder arthroplasty.

Aims: Body exhaust suits or surgical helmet systems (colloquially, 'space suits') are frequently used in many forms of arthroplasty, with the aim of providing personal protection to surgeons and, perhaps, reducing periprosthetic joint infections, although this has not consistently been borne out in systematic reviews and registry studies. To date, no large-scale study has investigated whether this is applicable to shoulder arthroplasty. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry to assess whether the use of surgical helmet systems was associated with lower all-cause revision or revision for deep infection in primary shoulder arthroplasties.

Methods: We analyzed 16,000 shoulder arthroplasties (hemiarthroplasties, anatomical, and reverse geometry prostheses) recorded on the New Zealand Joint Registry from its inception in 2000 to the present day. We assessed patient factors including age, BMI, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, as well as whether or not the operation took place in a laminar flow operating theatre.

Results: A total of 2,728 operations (17%) took place using surgical helmet systems. Patient cohorts were broadly similar in terms of indication for surgery (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures) and medical comorbidities (age and sex). There were 842 revisions (5% of cases) with just 98 for deep infection (0.6% of all cases or 11.6% of the revisions). There were no differences in all-cause revisions or revision for deep infection between the surgical helmet systems and conventional gowns (p = 0.893 and p = 0.911, respectively).

Conclusion: We found no evidence that wearing a surgical helmet system reduces the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection in any kind of primary shoulder arthroplasty. We acknowledge the limitations of this registry study and accept that there may be other benefits in terms of personal protection, comfort, or visibility. However, given their financial and ecological footprint, they should be used judiciously in shoulder surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment. Clinical outcomes after extra-articular resection of hip joint tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis with posterior column preserved. Uncompromised total knee arthroplasty function after distal femoral osteotomy. Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1