A comparison between bridge-related and non-bridge crashes: severity, vehicle involvement, and motorists' characteristics.

Objectives: Bridges, though representing a small portion of transport networks by length, are still prone to traffic crashes. Despite extensive research on bridge-related crashes globally, there's a scarcity of studies exploring differences between bridge- and non-bridge-related crashes. Thus, this paper attempts to add to the current knowledge by comparing bridge-related crashes and non-bridge crashes using a case study in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: By utilizing crash data in Victoria between January 2006 and April 2023; the Chi-squared test is conducted to examine differences between crash types. Partial proportion odds models are then employed to establish if bridge-related crashes tend to be more severe.

Results: In general, the analysis reveals that bridge-related crashes tend to result in more severe injury outcomes compared to non-bridge crashes. Furthermore, there is evidence that bridge-related crashes are more likely to be single-vehicle, to involve a heavy vehicle as well as young/male motorists, and to occur on high-speed roads, regional areas and at nighttime than non-bridge crashes.

Conclusions: A targeted program aiming at enhancing traffic safety at bridges is recommended due to the higher severity of bridge-related crashes. Considering the presence of bridges on the road network, and particularly in regional areas where many are in poorer conditions, it is essential to consider retrofitting as well as low-cost solutions in order to complement motorist education and awareness programs. Specific groups with higher risks of being involved in bridge-related crashes, such as young male motorists, should be targeted in these programs.