量化驾驶中的感知风险:蒙地卡罗避障方法。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647
Zhen Yang, Zhe Gong, Yimei Qin, Ruiping Zheng
{"title":"量化驾驶中的感知风险:蒙地卡罗避障方法。","authors":"Zhen Yang, Zhe Gong, Yimei Qin, Ruiping Zheng","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a model for quantifying perceived risk in obstacle avoidance, emphasizing how drivers' perceived risk characteristics influence their driving decisions. The research addresses the lack of attention given to modeling risk from the perspective of drivers' risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monte Carlo methods are employed to account for the uncertainties and complexities of driving behavior, restoring the probabilistic nature of risk. The proposed method quantifies perceived risk by incorporating drivers' fuzzy perceptions, enabling a quantitative evaluation during obstacle avoidance. A logit model is used to link perceived risk with driving decisions, identifying key factors influencing driver behavior in obstacle avoidance scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental data revealed significant variations in vehicle trajectories and speed distributions due to differences in drivers' experience and proficiency. The perceived risk indicator (PRI) values for leftward bypasses were higher compared to rightward bypasses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the PRI's strong predictive ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820. The logit model showed that both PRI and speed significantly influenced the probability of choosing a rightward bypass, achieving 90% accuracy. Building on the model, the study predicted and visualized the probability of vehicles turning right to avoid obstacles at different positions and speeds within 200 m of the obstacle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The research offers a framework for traffic professionals to understand driver-perceived risk and decision-making mechanisms. This understanding is beneficial for improving traffic safety and highlights the importance of considering drivers' risk perceptions in modeling driving behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying perceived risk in driving: A Monte Carlo approach for obstacle avoidance.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Yang, Zhe Gong, Yimei Qin, Ruiping Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a model for quantifying perceived risk in obstacle avoidance, emphasizing how drivers' perceived risk characteristics influence their driving decisions. The research addresses the lack of attention given to modeling risk from the perspective of drivers' risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monte Carlo methods are employed to account for the uncertainties and complexities of driving behavior, restoring the probabilistic nature of risk. The proposed method quantifies perceived risk by incorporating drivers' fuzzy perceptions, enabling a quantitative evaluation during obstacle avoidance. A logit model is used to link perceived risk with driving decisions, identifying key factors influencing driver behavior in obstacle avoidance scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental data revealed significant variations in vehicle trajectories and speed distributions due to differences in drivers' experience and proficiency. The perceived risk indicator (PRI) values for leftward bypasses were higher compared to rightward bypasses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the PRI's strong predictive ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820. The logit model showed that both PRI and speed significantly influenced the probability of choosing a rightward bypass, achieving 90% accuracy. Building on the model, the study predicted and visualized the probability of vehicles turning right to avoid obstacles at different positions and speeds within 200 m of the obstacle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The research offers a framework for traffic professionals to understand driver-perceived risk and decision-making mechanisms. This understanding is beneficial for improving traffic safety and highlights the importance of considering drivers' risk perceptions in modeling driving behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2405647","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在建立一个量化避障过程中感知风险的模型,强调驾驶者感知的风险特征如何影响其驾驶决策。该研究从驾驶员风险感知的角度出发,解决了风险建模缺乏关注的问题:方法:采用蒙特卡罗方法来考虑驾驶行为的不确定性和复杂性,还原风险的概率性质。所提出的方法通过纳入驾驶员的模糊感知来量化感知风险,从而在避障过程中进行量化评估。使用 logit 模型将感知风险与驾驶决策联系起来,从而确定影响驾驶员在避障场景中行为的关键因素:实验数据显示,由于驾驶员的经验和熟练程度不同,车辆的行驶轨迹和速度分布存在很大差异。与右侧绕行相比,左侧绕行的感知风险指标(PRI)值更高,接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)证实了 PRI 的强大预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.820。Logit 模型显示,PRI 和速度对选择向右绕行的概率有显著影响,准确率达到 90%。在该模型的基础上,研究预测了在距离障碍物 200 米范围内,不同位置和速度的车辆为避开障碍物而右转的概率,并将其可视化:这项研究为交通专业人员了解驾驶员感知风险和决策机制提供了一个框架。这种理解有利于改善交通安全,并强调了在驾驶行为建模中考虑驾驶员风险感知的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying perceived risk in driving: A Monte Carlo approach for obstacle avoidance.

Objective: This study aims to develop a model for quantifying perceived risk in obstacle avoidance, emphasizing how drivers' perceived risk characteristics influence their driving decisions. The research addresses the lack of attention given to modeling risk from the perspective of drivers' risk perceptions.

Methods: Monte Carlo methods are employed to account for the uncertainties and complexities of driving behavior, restoring the probabilistic nature of risk. The proposed method quantifies perceived risk by incorporating drivers' fuzzy perceptions, enabling a quantitative evaluation during obstacle avoidance. A logit model is used to link perceived risk with driving decisions, identifying key factors influencing driver behavior in obstacle avoidance scenarios.

Results: Experimental data revealed significant variations in vehicle trajectories and speed distributions due to differences in drivers' experience and proficiency. The perceived risk indicator (PRI) values for leftward bypasses were higher compared to rightward bypasses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the PRI's strong predictive ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.820. The logit model showed that both PRI and speed significantly influenced the probability of choosing a rightward bypass, achieving 90% accuracy. Building on the model, the study predicted and visualized the probability of vehicles turning right to avoid obstacles at different positions and speeds within 200 m of the obstacle.

Conclusions: The research offers a framework for traffic professionals to understand driver-perceived risk and decision-making mechanisms. This understanding is beneficial for improving traffic safety and highlights the importance of considering drivers' risk perceptions in modeling driving behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors. Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests. Exploring the barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists: A qualitative study. Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1