使用带和不带颈圈前片的 Macintosh 型刀片进行视频喉镜插管时的颈椎运动:随机对照试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4
Woo-Young Jo, Jae-Hyun Choi, Jay Kim, Kyung Won Shin, Seungeun Choi, Hee-Pyoung Park, Hyongmin Oh
{"title":"使用带和不带颈圈前片的 Macintosh 型刀片进行视频喉镜插管时的颈椎运动:随机对照试验。","authors":"Woo-Young Jo, Jae-Hyun Choi, Jay Kim, Kyung Won Shin, Seungeun Choi, Hee-Pyoung Park, Hyongmin Oh","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Applying a cervical collar during videolaryngoscopic intubation can increase the lifting force required to achieve adequate glottic view, potentially increasing cervical spine motion. We aimed to compared cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation between applying only the posterior piece (posterior-only group) and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces (anterior-posterior group) in patients wearing a cervical collar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a dingle-centre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in 102 patients (each group, N = 51). We used a videolaryngoscope (AceScope™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with a Macintosh-style blade (AceBlade™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for videolaryngoscopic intubation. In each group (posterior-only vs anterior-posterior), we measured cervical spine motion during intubation, defined as change in cervical spine angle (calculated as cervical spine angle at intubation minus that before intubation) at three cervical spine segments on lateral cervical spine radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in mean cervical spine motion during intubation between the posterior-only and anterior-posterior groups were 1.2° (98.3% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 3.0), 1.0° (98.3% CI, -0.6 to 2.6), and -0.3° (98.3% CI, -2.2 to 1.7) at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) cervical spine angles at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments in the posterior-only vs anterior-posterior groups were 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13), 5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14), and 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74), respectively. Intubation times were shorter in the posterior-only group (median [interquartile range], 23 [19-28] sec vs 33 [20-47] sec; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients wearing a cervical collar, the differences in mean cervical spine motions during intubation between applying only the posterior piece and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces were approximately 1°. Intubation times were significantly shorter without the anterior piece of a cervical collar. These findings can be referred to when removal of the anterior piece of a cervical collar is considered to address difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation conditions.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 ); first submitted 17 January 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation using a Macintosh-style blade with and without the anterior piece of a cervical collar: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Woo-Young Jo, Jae-Hyun Choi, Jay Kim, Kyung Won Shin, Seungeun Choi, Hee-Pyoung Park, Hyongmin Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Applying a cervical collar during videolaryngoscopic intubation can increase the lifting force required to achieve adequate glottic view, potentially increasing cervical spine motion. We aimed to compared cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation between applying only the posterior piece (posterior-only group) and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces (anterior-posterior group) in patients wearing a cervical collar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a dingle-centre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in 102 patients (each group, N = 51). We used a videolaryngoscope (AceScope™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with a Macintosh-style blade (AceBlade™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for videolaryngoscopic intubation. In each group (posterior-only vs anterior-posterior), we measured cervical spine motion during intubation, defined as change in cervical spine angle (calculated as cervical spine angle at intubation minus that before intubation) at three cervical spine segments on lateral cervical spine radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in mean cervical spine motion during intubation between the posterior-only and anterior-posterior groups were 1.2° (98.3% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 3.0), 1.0° (98.3% CI, -0.6 to 2.6), and -0.3° (98.3% CI, -2.2 to 1.7) at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) cervical spine angles at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments in the posterior-only vs anterior-posterior groups were 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13), 5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14), and 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74), respectively. Intubation times were shorter in the posterior-only group (median [interquartile range], 23 [19-28] sec vs 33 [20-47] sec; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients wearing a cervical collar, the differences in mean cervical spine motions during intubation between applying only the posterior piece and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces were approximately 1°. Intubation times were significantly shorter without the anterior piece of a cervical collar. These findings can be referred to when removal of the anterior piece of a cervical collar is considered to address difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation conditions.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 ); first submitted 17 January 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02849-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在视频喉镜插管过程中使用颈圈会增加实现充分声门视野所需的提升力,从而可能增加颈椎的运动。我们的目的是比较佩戴颈圈的患者在视频喉镜插管过程中仅使用后部插管片(仅使用后部插管片组)与同时使用前部和后部插管片(前部-后部插管片组)的颈椎运动情况:我们在 102 名患者(每组 51 人)中进行了一项单中心、平行组、随机对照试验。我们使用带有 Macintosh 型刀片(AceBlade™,Ace Medical,韩国首尔)的视频喉镜(AceScope™,Ace Medical,韩国首尔)进行视频喉镜插管。在每组(纯后路插管与前路-后路插管)中,我们测量了插管过程中的颈椎运动,其定义为颈椎侧位片上三个颈椎节段的颈椎角度变化(计算方法为插管时的颈椎角度减去插管前的颈椎角度):纯后路组和前-后路组在插管时的平均颈椎活动度在枕-C1、C1-C2 和 C2-C5 节段的差异分别为 1.2°(98.3% 置信区间 [CI],-0.7 至 3.0)、1.0°(98.3% 置信区间 [CI],-0.6 至 2.6)和-0.3°(98.3% 置信区间 [CI],-2.2 至 1.7)。纯后路组与前-后路组枕-C1、C1-C2 和 C2-C5 节段颈椎角度的平均值(标准差)分别为 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13)、5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14) 和 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74)。纯后路组的插管时间更短(中位数[四分位距],23 [19-28] 秒 vs 33 [20-47] 秒;P = 0.003):对于佩戴颈椎项圈的患者,在插管过程中,仅使用后方项圈与同时使用前方和后方项圈的平均颈椎运动角度相差约 1°。在没有颈椎项圈前片的情况下,插管时间明显缩短。在考虑去除颈圈前片以解决困难的视频喉镜插管条件时,可以参考这些发现:研究注册:CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 );2023年1月17日首次提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation using a Macintosh-style blade with and without the anterior piece of a cervical collar: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: Applying a cervical collar during videolaryngoscopic intubation can increase the lifting force required to achieve adequate glottic view, potentially increasing cervical spine motion. We aimed to compared cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation between applying only the posterior piece (posterior-only group) and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces (anterior-posterior group) in patients wearing a cervical collar.

Methods: We conducted a dingle-centre, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in 102 patients (each group, N = 51). We used a videolaryngoscope (AceScope™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) with a Macintosh-style blade (AceBlade™, Ace Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for videolaryngoscopic intubation. In each group (posterior-only vs anterior-posterior), we measured cervical spine motion during intubation, defined as change in cervical spine angle (calculated as cervical spine angle at intubation minus that before intubation) at three cervical spine segments on lateral cervical spine radiographs.

Results: The differences in mean cervical spine motion during intubation between the posterior-only and anterior-posterior groups were 1.2° (98.3% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 3.0), 1.0° (98.3% CI, -0.6 to 2.6), and -0.3° (98.3% CI, -2.2 to 1.7) at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) cervical spine angles at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments in the posterior-only vs anterior-posterior groups were 10.8° (4.2) vs 9.6° (3.3) (P = 0.13), 5.6° (3.0) vs 4.7° (3.5) (P = 0.14), and 1.2° (3.7) vs 1.5° (4.3) (P = 0.74), respectively. Intubation times were shorter in the posterior-only group (median [interquartile range], 23 [19-28] sec vs 33 [20-47] sec; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: In patients wearing a cervical collar, the differences in mean cervical spine motions during intubation between applying only the posterior piece and applying both the anterior and posterior pieces were approximately 1°. Intubation times were significantly shorter without the anterior piece of a cervical collar. These findings can be referred to when removal of the anterior piece of a cervical collar is considered to address difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation conditions.

Study registration: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008151 ); first submitted 17 January 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
期刊最新文献
Methods for determining optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: a scoping review. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: a historical cohort study. Important features of hospitals, intensive care unit waiting rooms, and patient care rooms: perspectives of intensive care unit visitors. Squats, spinach, and soul: considering disparities in prehabilitation medicine before programmatic implementation. The implementation of preoperative optimization in British Columbia: a quality improvement initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1