经阴道超声波检查确认直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症时,肠道准备工作对核磁共振扫描的影响。

Cemil Gürses, Alpaslan Yavuz, Nevfel Kahvecioğlu, Mustafa Yalçın, Gizem Ünal, Burak Karadağ, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe
{"title":"经阴道超声波检查确认直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症时,肠道准备工作对核磁共振扫描的影响。","authors":"Cemil Gürses, Alpaslan Yavuz, Nevfel Kahvecioğlu, Mustafa Yalçın, Gizem Ünal, Burak Karadağ, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe","doi":"10.11152/mu-4441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aims to assess the impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and to examine the level of agreement among investigators, including radiologists and clinicians with varying levels of MRI experience.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients underwent MRI scans, with 34 showing RSE and 24 without involvement, according to TVUS as the reference standard. The scans were conducted both with and without a bowel preparatory protocol (BPP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest concordance was observed in the group 4, which included patients with RSE and BPP, with a Kappa value of 0.47-0.52. In contrast, for groups with MRI scans without the BPP, there was no consistency among the investigators (Kappa <0.20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.72, 0.47, 0.72, and 0.47 without BPP, and increased to 0.82, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.74, respectively, after BPP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results reveal that the concordance between investigators in detecting RSE via MRI scan improves with the use of BPP. Additionally, the success rate of MRI and TVUS for detecting RSE can be comparable, but only if bowel preparatory techniques are utilized during MRI scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Cemil Gürses, Alpaslan Yavuz, Nevfel Kahvecioğlu, Mustafa Yalçın, Gizem Ünal, Burak Karadağ, Hüseyin Çiyiltepe\",\"doi\":\"10.11152/mu-4441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aims to assess the impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and to examine the level of agreement among investigators, including radiologists and clinicians with varying levels of MRI experience.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients underwent MRI scans, with 34 showing RSE and 24 without involvement, according to TVUS as the reference standard. The scans were conducted both with and without a bowel preparatory protocol (BPP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest concordance was observed in the group 4, which included patients with RSE and BPP, with a Kappa value of 0.47-0.52. In contrast, for groups with MRI scans without the BPP, there was no consistency among the investigators (Kappa <0.20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.72, 0.47, 0.72, and 0.47 without BPP, and increased to 0.82, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.74, respectively, after BPP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results reveal that the concordance between investigators in detecting RSE via MRI scan improves with the use of BPP. Additionally, the success rate of MRI and TVUS for detecting RSE can be comparable, but only if bowel preparatory techniques are utilized during MRI scans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究旨在评估肠道准备对核磁共振扫描诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症(RSE)的影响,并检查研究人员(包括具有不同核磁共振经验的放射科医生和临床医生)之间的一致程度:58例患者接受了核磁共振扫描,其中34例显示RSE,24例未受累,以TVUS为参考标准。扫描同时进行和不进行肠道准备方案(BPP):结果:第 4 组(包括 RSE 和 BPP 患者)的一致性最高,Kappa 值为 0.47-0.52。相比之下,在没有 BPP 的 MRI 扫描组中,研究人员之间没有一致性(Kappa 结论):结果表明,使用 BPP 后,研究人员之间通过 MRI 扫描检测 RSE 的一致性提高了。此外,磁共振成像和 TVUS 检测 RSE 的成功率不相上下,但前提是在磁共振成像扫描时使用肠道准备技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Aims: The study aims to assess the impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans in diagnosing rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and to examine the level of agreement among investigators, including radiologists and clinicians with varying levels of MRI experience.

Material and methods: Fifty-eight patients underwent MRI scans, with 34 showing RSE and 24 without involvement, according to TVUS as the reference standard. The scans were conducted both with and without a bowel preparatory protocol (BPP).

Results: The highest concordance was observed in the group 4, which included patients with RSE and BPP, with a Kappa value of 0.47-0.52. In contrast, for groups with MRI scans without the BPP, there was no consistency among the investigators (Kappa <0.20). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.72, 0.47, 0.72, and 0.47 without BPP, and increased to 0.82, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.74, respectively, after BPP.

Conclusions: The results reveal that the concordance between investigators in detecting RSE via MRI scan improves with the use of BPP. Additionally, the success rate of MRI and TVUS for detecting RSE can be comparable, but only if bowel preparatory techniques are utilized during MRI scans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography for detecting stenosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatic cancer liver metastasis mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. A case report. The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Advancements and challenges in Shear-Wave Elastography of tendons: a comprehensive review. An [illustrative] update on pediatric emergency ultrasound: part 3 - cerebral, musculoskeletal and other applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1