使用三种注射前程序降低 8 至 12 岁儿童口内注射的疼痛感:随机对照试验

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-15
Santhebachalli Prakasha Shrutha, Raghavendra Havale, Bollavaram Golla Aishwarya, Shiny Raj, Nafiya Quazi, Vara Prasad, Nagappa Guttiganur, Revati Kandalam
{"title":"使用三种注射前程序降低 8 至 12 岁儿童口内注射的疼痛感:随机对照试验","authors":"Santhebachalli Prakasha Shrutha, Raghavendra Havale, Bollavaram Golla Aishwarya, Shiny Raj, Nafiya Quazi, Vara Prasad, Nagappa Guttiganur, Revati Kandalam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the efficacy of laser phototherapy, Buzzy®, and lignocaine gel in minimizing pain during intraoral injections. <b>Methods:</b> In this randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of standard lignocaine gel (Group A) was compared with Buzzy® (Group B) and laser phototherapy (Group C) as pre-anesthetic agents in 15 children aged eight to 12 years undergoing intraoral local anesthesia (LA). Pain perception during needle insertion was assessed objectively using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and subjectively using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included chi-square and analysis of variance tests (P<0.05). <b>Results:</b> Objective assessment of pain perception using FLACC scores demonstrated that Buzzy® resulted in the highest comfort levels; 60 percent of the subjects treated with Buzzy®, 40 percent treated with laser phototherapy, and 6.7 percent treated with lignocaine topical anesthetic were judged to be relaxed and comfortable or exhibiting mild discomfort, respectively. Subjective pain assessment (self-reported using the VAS) was significantly lower in Buzzy® (0.67±0.82 standard deviation) followed by laser phototherapy (1.00±1.13) and Lignocaine gel group (2.13±1.51). <b>Conclusions:</b> The Buzzy® and laser phototherapy effectively reduced intraoral injection pain compared to the standard control, lignocaine gel. However, Buzzy® showed better efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"46 5","pages":"306-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Santhebachalli Prakasha Shrutha, Raghavendra Havale, Bollavaram Golla Aishwarya, Shiny Raj, Nafiya Quazi, Vara Prasad, Nagappa Guttiganur, Revati Kandalam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the efficacy of laser phototherapy, Buzzy®, and lignocaine gel in minimizing pain during intraoral injections. <b>Methods:</b> In this randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of standard lignocaine gel (Group A) was compared with Buzzy® (Group B) and laser phototherapy (Group C) as pre-anesthetic agents in 15 children aged eight to 12 years undergoing intraoral local anesthesia (LA). Pain perception during needle insertion was assessed objectively using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and subjectively using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included chi-square and analysis of variance tests (P<0.05). <b>Results:</b> Objective assessment of pain perception using FLACC scores demonstrated that Buzzy® resulted in the highest comfort levels; 60 percent of the subjects treated with Buzzy®, 40 percent treated with laser phototherapy, and 6.7 percent treated with lignocaine topical anesthetic were judged to be relaxed and comfortable or exhibiting mild discomfort, respectively. Subjective pain assessment (self-reported using the VAS) was significantly lower in Buzzy® (0.67±0.82 standard deviation) followed by laser phototherapy (1.00±1.13) and Lignocaine gel group (2.13±1.51). <b>Conclusions:</b> The Buzzy® and laser phototherapy effectively reduced intraoral injection pain compared to the standard control, lignocaine gel. However, Buzzy® showed better efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"306-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较激光光疗、Buzzy® 和木质素凝胶在减轻口腔内注射疼痛方面的疗效。方法: 在这项随机对照试验中,标准木质素凝胶组的疗效优于 Buzzy在这项随机对照试验中,15 名 8 至 12 岁的儿童接受了口腔局部麻醉(LA),比较了标准木质素凝胶(A 组)与 Buzzy®(B 组)和激光光疗(C 组)作为麻醉前用药的效果。使用面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、舒适度(FLACC)量表对针刺过程中的疼痛感进行客观评估,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛感进行主观评估。统计分析包括卡方检验和方差分析(PResults:使用 FLACC 评分对疼痛感进行的客观评估表明,Buzzy® 带来的舒适度最高;接受 Buzzy® 治疗、激光光疗和木质素局部麻醉剂治疗的受试者中,分别有 60% 和 40% 的人被判定为放松舒适或表现出轻度不适。主观疼痛评估(使用 VAS 自我报告)在 Buzzy® 组(0.67±0.82 标准差)明显较低,其次是激光光疗组(1.00±1.13)和木质素凝胶组(2.13±1.51)。结论与标准对照组木质素凝胶相比,Buzzy®和激光光疗可有效减轻口内注射疼痛。但 Buzzy® 的疗效更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of laser phototherapy, Buzzy®, and lignocaine gel in minimizing pain during intraoral injections. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, the efficacy of standard lignocaine gel (Group A) was compared with Buzzy® (Group B) and laser phototherapy (Group C) as pre-anesthetic agents in 15 children aged eight to 12 years undergoing intraoral local anesthesia (LA). Pain perception during needle insertion was assessed objectively using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and subjectively using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included chi-square and analysis of variance tests (P<0.05). Results: Objective assessment of pain perception using FLACC scores demonstrated that Buzzy® resulted in the highest comfort levels; 60 percent of the subjects treated with Buzzy®, 40 percent treated with laser phototherapy, and 6.7 percent treated with lignocaine topical anesthetic were judged to be relaxed and comfortable or exhibiting mild discomfort, respectively. Subjective pain assessment (self-reported using the VAS) was significantly lower in Buzzy® (0.67±0.82 standard deviation) followed by laser phototherapy (1.00±1.13) and Lignocaine gel group (2.13±1.51). Conclusions: The Buzzy® and laser phototherapy effectively reduced intraoral injection pain compared to the standard control, lignocaine gel. However, Buzzy® showed better efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Responses of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Special Needs Dentistry. Adopting The D3 Group's Translational Paradigm for Molar Hypomineralization and Chalky Teeth. Assessment of Oral Hygiene and Gingivitis in Adolescents With and Without Cystic Fibrosis. Association of Parental Divorce With Oral Health in U.S. Children and Adolescents. Comparison of Compressive Strength Between Traditional and Novel Open-Faced Stainless Steel Crowns Filled With Different Restorative Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1