利用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影检查心外膜和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织对射血分数保留型心力衰竭的预后价值。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae216
Shuangxiang Lin, Chenjia Liu, Shuyue Wang, Xingfa Ding, Jiaxing Wu, Xinhong Wang, Sun Jianzhong
{"title":"利用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影检查心外膜和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织对射血分数保留型心力衰竭的预后价值。","authors":"Shuangxiang Lin, Chenjia Liu, Shuyue Wang, Xingfa Ding, Jiaxing Wu, Xinhong Wang, Sun Jianzhong","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prognostic significance of epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATv) and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCATa) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was based on HFpEF and controls who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) screening to rule out coronary disease. Comparisons of EATv and PCATa were made between HFpEF patients and a control group, employing statistical analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to assess prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The EATv was 56.1 cm3 ± 11.9 and PCATa in the right coronary artery (PCATa-RCA) was -74.7 HU ± 3.82 in HFpEF patients, which increased significantly compared with controls. Among them, 112 HFpEF patients (mean age: 71.9 ± 8.5 years; 40% male) were followed up for a median of 27 ± 0.6 months (range 2-47 months). EATv and PCATa-RCA were predictive of outcome with an optimal threshold of 56.29 cm3 and -71.17 HU, respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the high EATv and PCATa-RCA attenuation had significantly higher rates of composite outcomes (log-rank test, all P < 0.01). EATv and PCATa-RCA were independently predictive of outcome following adjustment for confounding variables (EATv: hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.01-1.06); p < 0.01, PCTAa-RCA: HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.27-1.62; p < 0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased EATv and PCATa-RCA are associated with worse clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study highlights the potential of CCTA-derived adipose tissue metrics as novel, non-invasive biomarkers for risk stratification in HFpEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Shuangxiang Lin, Chenjia Liu, Shuyue Wang, Xingfa Ding, Jiaxing Wu, Xinhong Wang, Sun Jianzhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqae216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prognostic significance of epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATv) and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCATa) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was based on HFpEF and controls who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) screening to rule out coronary disease. Comparisons of EATv and PCATa were made between HFpEF patients and a control group, employing statistical analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to assess prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 224 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The EATv was 56.1 cm3 ± 11.9 and PCATa in the right coronary artery (PCATa-RCA) was -74.7 HU ± 3.82 in HFpEF patients, which increased significantly compared with controls. Among them, 112 HFpEF patients (mean age: 71.9 ± 8.5 years; 40% male) were followed up for a median of 27 ± 0.6 months (range 2-47 months). EATv and PCATa-RCA were predictive of outcome with an optimal threshold of 56.29 cm3 and -71.17 HU, respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the high EATv and PCATa-RCA attenuation had significantly higher rates of composite outcomes (log-rank test, all P < 0.01). EATv and PCATa-RCA were independently predictive of outcome following adjustment for confounding variables (EATv: hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.01-1.06); p < 0.01, PCTAa-RCA: HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.27-1.62; p < 0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased EATv and PCATa-RCA are associated with worse clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study highlights the potential of CCTA-derived adipose tissue metrics as novel, non-invasive biomarkers for risk stratification in HFpEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者心外膜脂肪组织体积(EATv)和冠状动脉周围脂肪组织衰减(PCATa)的预后意义:这项回顾性研究以接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)筛查以排除冠状动脉疾病的 HFpEF 和对照组为基础。通过卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)和考克斯回归(Cox regression)等统计分析评估预后意义,对高频心衰患者和对照组的 EATv 和 PCATa 进行比较:结果:共对224名患者进行了回顾性分析。与对照组相比,HFpEF 患者的 EATv 为 56.1 cm3 ± 11.9,右冠状动脉 PCATa 为 -74.7 HU ± 3.82。其中,112 名 HFpEF 患者(平均年龄:71.9 ± 8.5 岁;男性占 40%)的随访时间中位数为 27 ± 0.6 个月(2-47 个月)。EATv 和 PCATa-RCA 预测预后的最佳阈值分别为 56.29 cm3 和 -71.17 HU。在卡普兰-梅耶尔分析中,EATv和PCATa-RCA衰减程度高者的综合预后率明显更高(对数秩检验,均为P 结论:EATv和PCATa-RCA衰减程度越高,综合预后率越高:EATv和PCATa-RCA的增加与HFpEF患者较差的临床预后有关:本研究强调了 CCTA 衍生的脂肪组织指标作为新型非侵入性生物标志物对高频心衰患者进行风险分层的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The prognostic value of Epicardial and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Objectives: To assess the prognostic significance of epicardial adipose tissue volume (EATv) and pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCATa) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Methods: This retrospective study was based on HFpEF and controls who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) screening to rule out coronary disease. Comparisons of EATv and PCATa were made between HFpEF patients and a control group, employing statistical analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression to assess prognostic significance.

Results: A total of 224 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The EATv was 56.1 cm3 ± 11.9 and PCATa in the right coronary artery (PCATa-RCA) was -74.7 HU ± 3.82 in HFpEF patients, which increased significantly compared with controls. Among them, 112 HFpEF patients (mean age: 71.9 ± 8.5 years; 40% male) were followed up for a median of 27 ± 0.6 months (range 2-47 months). EATv and PCATa-RCA were predictive of outcome with an optimal threshold of 56.29 cm3 and -71.17 HU, respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the high EATv and PCATa-RCA attenuation had significantly higher rates of composite outcomes (log-rank test, all P < 0.01). EATv and PCATa-RCA were independently predictive of outcome following adjustment for confounding variables (EATv: hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.01-1.06); p < 0.01, PCTAa-RCA: HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.27-1.62; p < 0.001)).

Conclusions: Increased EATv and PCATa-RCA are associated with worse clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients.

Advances in knowledge: This study highlights the potential of CCTA-derived adipose tissue metrics as novel, non-invasive biomarkers for risk stratification in HFpEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Children's bone age development is delayed with increasing altitude: a multicentre study. Striving for excellence: multicentre quality improvement project to optimize CT KUB technique in renal colic patients. Assessment of interstitial lung disease in a systemic sclerosis patient cohort using photon-counting detector CT with ultra-high resolution and a 1024-pixel image matrix. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib/camrelizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arterioportal shunts. Sister partnership to overcome the global burden of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1