外科手术指南辅助的前牙纤维桩去除技术的准确性和效率:体外研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.3390/dj12100333
Ryota Ito, Satoshi Watanabe, Kazuhisa Satake, Ryuma Saito, Takashi Okiji
{"title":"外科手术指南辅助的前牙纤维桩去除技术的准确性和效率:体外研究。","authors":"Ryota Ito, Satoshi Watanabe, Kazuhisa Satake, Ryuma Saito, Takashi Okiji","doi":"10.3390/dj12100333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study compared the accuracy and efficiency of different surgical-guide (SG)-assisted and freehand drilling techniques for removing fiber posts from maxillary anterior teeth performed by differently experienced operators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A fiber post was bonded to the root canal of 54 extracted maxillary anterior teeth. After mounting the teeth in the jaw models, SGs were designed by integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanner data. Each SG included a custom sleeve. An experienced or inexperienced operator drilled the post using three different techniques: (i) SG-assisted incremental drilling at 2-3 mm (SG1), (ii) SG-assisted one-time drilling to a predetermined depth (SG2), and (iii) freehand incremental drilling without SG (FH; n = 9 in each group). Deviations in coronal, sagittal, and horizontal planes and the angle of deviation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SG1 and SG2 groups showed significantly smaller sagittal and horizontal deviations than the FH group, regardless of the operator's experience. The SG2 group had a significantly shorter working time than the SG1 and FH groups. In the FH group, the experienced operator required a significantly shorter working time than the inexperienced operator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG-assisted drilling techniques enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of removing fiber posts from the anterior teeth, irrespective of the operator's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Ito, Satoshi Watanabe, Kazuhisa Satake, Ryuma Saito, Takashi Okiji\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12100333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study compared the accuracy and efficiency of different surgical-guide (SG)-assisted and freehand drilling techniques for removing fiber posts from maxillary anterior teeth performed by differently experienced operators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A fiber post was bonded to the root canal of 54 extracted maxillary anterior teeth. After mounting the teeth in the jaw models, SGs were designed by integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanner data. Each SG included a custom sleeve. An experienced or inexperienced operator drilled the post using three different techniques: (i) SG-assisted incremental drilling at 2-3 mm (SG1), (ii) SG-assisted one-time drilling to a predetermined depth (SG2), and (iii) freehand incremental drilling without SG (FH; n = 9 in each group). Deviations in coronal, sagittal, and horizontal planes and the angle of deviation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SG1 and SG2 groups showed significantly smaller sagittal and horizontal deviations than the FH group, regardless of the operator's experience. The SG2 group had a significantly shorter working time than the SG1 and FH groups. In the FH group, the experienced operator required a significantly shorter working time than the inexperienced operator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG-assisted drilling techniques enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of removing fiber posts from the anterior teeth, irrespective of the operator's experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12100333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12100333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究比较了由经验不同的操作者在不同的手术导板(SG)辅助下和徒手钻孔技术下拔除上颌前牙纤维桩的准确性和效率:在 54 颗拔出的上颌前牙的根管内粘结纤维桩。将牙齿安装到颌骨模型中后,通过整合锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口内扫描仪数据设计出 SG。每个 SG 都包括一个定制的套筒。有经验或无经验的操作者使用三种不同的技术钻柱:(i) SG 辅助下以 2-3 mm 的深度递增钻柱(SG1);(ii) SG 辅助下一次性钻柱至预定深度(SG2);(iii) 不使用 SG 的徒手递增钻柱(FH;每组 n = 9)。测量冠状面、矢状面和水平面的偏差以及偏差角度:无论操作者的经验如何,SG1 和 SG2 组的矢状面和水平面偏差都明显小于 FH 组。SG2 组的工作时间明显短于 SG1 和 FH 组。在 FH 组中,经验丰富的操作员所需的工作时间明显短于经验不足的操作员:无论操作者的经验如何,SG 辅助钻孔技术都能提高从前牙拔除纤维桩的准确性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study.

Background/objectives: This study compared the accuracy and efficiency of different surgical-guide (SG)-assisted and freehand drilling techniques for removing fiber posts from maxillary anterior teeth performed by differently experienced operators.

Methods: A fiber post was bonded to the root canal of 54 extracted maxillary anterior teeth. After mounting the teeth in the jaw models, SGs were designed by integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanner data. Each SG included a custom sleeve. An experienced or inexperienced operator drilled the post using three different techniques: (i) SG-assisted incremental drilling at 2-3 mm (SG1), (ii) SG-assisted one-time drilling to a predetermined depth (SG2), and (iii) freehand incremental drilling without SG (FH; n = 9 in each group). Deviations in coronal, sagittal, and horizontal planes and the angle of deviation were measured.

Results: The SG1 and SG2 groups showed significantly smaller sagittal and horizontal deviations than the FH group, regardless of the operator's experience. The SG2 group had a significantly shorter working time than the SG1 and FH groups. In the FH group, the experienced operator required a significantly shorter working time than the inexperienced operator.

Conclusions: SG-assisted drilling techniques enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of removing fiber posts from the anterior teeth, irrespective of the operator's experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home Biofilm Management in Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review. In Vitro Research Methods Used to Evaluate Shaping Ability of Rotary Endodontic Files-A Literature Review. Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study. Correlation between Periodontitis and Onset of Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review. The Harmful Effects of Welding Fumes on Human Dental Enamel-A Microhardness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1