质子泵抑制剂与心血管风险:重要综述。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Future cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2024.2412910
Gustavo J Duarte, Jose Lopez, Franklin Sosa, Guarina Molina, Mohammed Shaban, Justin Mark, Asma Khizar, Aathira Sreenivasan, An Tran, Miguel Rodriguez Guerra
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与心血管风险:重要综述。","authors":"Gustavo J Duarte, Jose Lopez, Franklin Sosa, Guarina Molina, Mohammed Shaban, Justin Mark, Asma Khizar, Aathira Sreenivasan, An Tran, Miguel Rodriguez Guerra","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2024.2412910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used medications for gastrointestinal disorders. Recent research suggests a potential association between long-term PPI use and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, creating a complex clinical dilemma. This review critically evaluates the current evidence for this association, considering the limitations of observational studies and the lack of definitive confirmation from randomized controlled trials.This review delves into the reported association between PPIs and adverse CV events, examining proposed mechanisms such as drug interactions, electrolyte imbalances induced by PPIs and their potential impact on cardiac and vascular function. Evidence suggests these mechanisms converge, with varying influence depending on patient populations.Clinicians require a risk-benefit analysis for each patient considering their CV risk profile. Alternative gastrointestinal therapies should be explored for high-bleeding risk patients. Medications with lower cytochrome-P450 interaction potential may be preferable among essential PPI users. Elucidating the specific mechanisms by which PPIs might influence CV health, assessing long-term vascular effects and investigating interactions with newer anticoagulant medications are crucial for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton pump inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a critical review.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo J Duarte, Jose Lopez, Franklin Sosa, Guarina Molina, Mohammed Shaban, Justin Mark, Asma Khizar, Aathira Sreenivasan, An Tran, Miguel Rodriguez Guerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2024.2412910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used medications for gastrointestinal disorders. Recent research suggests a potential association between long-term PPI use and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, creating a complex clinical dilemma. This review critically evaluates the current evidence for this association, considering the limitations of observational studies and the lack of definitive confirmation from randomized controlled trials.This review delves into the reported association between PPIs and adverse CV events, examining proposed mechanisms such as drug interactions, electrolyte imbalances induced by PPIs and their potential impact on cardiac and vascular function. Evidence suggests these mechanisms converge, with varying influence depending on patient populations.Clinicians require a risk-benefit analysis for each patient considering their CV risk profile. Alternative gastrointestinal therapies should be explored for high-bleeding risk patients. Medications with lower cytochrome-P450 interaction potential may be preferable among essential PPI users. Elucidating the specific mechanisms by which PPIs might influence CV health, assessing long-term vascular effects and investigating interactions with newer anticoagulant medications are crucial for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2412910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2412910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是广泛用于治疗胃肠道疾病的药物。最近的研究表明,长期服用质子泵抑制剂与心血管(CV)风险增加之间可能存在关联,从而造成了复杂的临床难题。考虑到观察性研究的局限性以及缺乏随机对照试验的明确证实,本综述对这一关联的现有证据进行了批判性评估。本综述深入研究了所报道的 PPI 与不良 CV 事件之间的关联,考察了药物相互作用、PPI 引起的电解质失衡及其对心脏和血管功能的潜在影响等拟议机制。有证据表明,这些机制趋于一致,但根据患者人群的不同,其影响也各不相同。对于高出血风险患者,应探索其他胃肠道疗法。对于必须服用 PPI 的患者来说,细胞色素-P450 相互作用可能性较低的药物可能更可取。阐明 PPIs 影响心血管健康的具体机制、评估对血管的长期影响以及调查与新型抗凝药物的相互作用是未来研究的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proton pump inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a critical review.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used medications for gastrointestinal disorders. Recent research suggests a potential association between long-term PPI use and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, creating a complex clinical dilemma. This review critically evaluates the current evidence for this association, considering the limitations of observational studies and the lack of definitive confirmation from randomized controlled trials.This review delves into the reported association between PPIs and adverse CV events, examining proposed mechanisms such as drug interactions, electrolyte imbalances induced by PPIs and their potential impact on cardiac and vascular function. Evidence suggests these mechanisms converge, with varying influence depending on patient populations.Clinicians require a risk-benefit analysis for each patient considering their CV risk profile. Alternative gastrointestinal therapies should be explored for high-bleeding risk patients. Medications with lower cytochrome-P450 interaction potential may be preferable among essential PPI users. Elucidating the specific mechanisms by which PPIs might influence CV health, assessing long-term vascular effects and investigating interactions with newer anticoagulant medications are crucial for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
期刊最新文献
Electrocardiographic and biochemical predictors of left ventricular remodeling early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Severe acute recoil following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis in a heavily calcified bicuspid aortic valve. Single-center initial experience with a new pulsed-field ablation system: pulmonary vein isolation lesions and beyond. Soft drinks, fish oil and atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1