对受粪肠球菌污染的牙刷进行体外消毒的家用技术的有效性。

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3509832
Gina Alessandra Donayre-Salvatierra, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Raul M Olaechea, Oscar Reátegui, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez
{"title":"对受粪肠球菌污染的牙刷进行体外消毒的家用技术的有效性。","authors":"Gina Alessandra Donayre-Salvatierra, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Raul M Olaechea, Oscar Reátegui, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez","doi":"10.1155/2024/3509832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Oral hygiene education for patients is fundamental in preventive-promotional dentistry. The disinfection of toothbrushes (TBs) must be integrated into this context due to their proximity to contaminant sources that make them vulnerable to cross infection in homes. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of domestic techniques for disinfection of TBs. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We performed an in vitro study of 76 TBs contaminated with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>Ef</i>) ATCC 29212 subjected to different disinfection protocols: G1. Distilled water (DW; negative control; <i>n</i> = 8), G2. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)10% (negative control; <i>n</i> = 8), G3. Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% (positive control; <i>n</i> = 15), G4. 100% white vinegar (WV; <i>n</i> = 15), G5. Microwave (MW) at 700 W (<i>n</i> = 15), and G6. 200 mg/mL of certified alcoholic extract of purple garlic (GARLIC) from Arequipa (<i>Allium sativum L</i>; <i>n</i> = 15). Bacterial count was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/mL) categorized as contamination: low (<30), medium (30-300), and high (>300). The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairs was used at a significance level of <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Efficacy against <i>Ef</i> showed highly significant differences between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with lower median CFU/mL in G3 and G4 (Me = 0 [IQR (interquartile range) = 0]: low) and G5 (Me = 6000 [IQR = 45,000]: low/medium) versus negative controls (Me = 378,500 and 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 and 6,760,000]: medium/high; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.019). The counts of the G5 were not statistically different than G3, G4, and G6 (<i>p</i> > 0.06). The G6 (Me = 1,510,000 [IQR = 590,000]: medium) was inferior to G3 and G4 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but similar to both negative control groups (<i>p</i> > 0.999). <b>Conclusions:</b> Disinfection of TBs with CHX, WV, and MWs produces a significant effective reduction in the count of <i>Ef</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"3509832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Efficacy of Domestic Techniques for Disinfection of Toothbrushes Contaminated With <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Gina Alessandra Donayre-Salvatierra, Julissa Amparo Dulanto-Vargas, Raul M Olaechea, Oscar Reátegui, Kilder Maynor Carranza-Samanez\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3509832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Oral hygiene education for patients is fundamental in preventive-promotional dentistry. The disinfection of toothbrushes (TBs) must be integrated into this context due to their proximity to contaminant sources that make them vulnerable to cross infection in homes. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of domestic techniques for disinfection of TBs. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We performed an in vitro study of 76 TBs contaminated with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>Ef</i>) ATCC 29212 subjected to different disinfection protocols: G1. Distilled water (DW; negative control; <i>n</i> = 8), G2. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)10% (negative control; <i>n</i> = 8), G3. Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% (positive control; <i>n</i> = 15), G4. 100% white vinegar (WV; <i>n</i> = 15), G5. Microwave (MW) at 700 W (<i>n</i> = 15), and G6. 200 mg/mL of certified alcoholic extract of purple garlic (GARLIC) from Arequipa (<i>Allium sativum L</i>; <i>n</i> = 15). Bacterial count was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/mL) categorized as contamination: low (<30), medium (30-300), and high (>300). The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairs was used at a significance level of <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Efficacy against <i>Ef</i> showed highly significant differences between groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with lower median CFU/mL in G3 and G4 (Me = 0 [IQR (interquartile range) = 0]: low) and G5 (Me = 6000 [IQR = 45,000]: low/medium) versus negative controls (Me = 378,500 and 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 and 6,760,000]: medium/high; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.019). The counts of the G5 were not statistically different than G3, G4, and G6 (<i>p</i> > 0.06). The G6 (Me = 1,510,000 [IQR = 590,000]: medium) was inferior to G3 and G4 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but similar to both negative control groups (<i>p</i> > 0.999). <b>Conclusions:</b> Disinfection of TBs with CHX, WV, and MWs produces a significant effective reduction in the count of <i>Ef</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"3509832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3509832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3509832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介对患者进行口腔卫生教育是牙科预防宣传的基础。由于牙刷(TB)靠近污染源,在家庭中很容易发生交叉感染,因此必须将牙刷(TB)的消毒纳入其中。本研究的目的是比较国内牙刷消毒技术的有效性。材料和方法:我们对受到粪肠球菌 (Ef) ATCC 29212 污染的 76 个结核菌进行了体外研究,并采用了不同的消毒方案:G1.蒸馏水(DW;阴性对照;n = 8),G2.10%二甲基亚砜(DMSO)(阴性对照;n = 8),G3.洗必泰(CHX)0.12%(阳性对照;n = 15),G4.100%白醋(WV;n = 15),G5.微波(MW)700 W(n = 15),G6.200 毫克/毫升经认证的阿雷基帕紫蒜(Allium sativum L;n = 15)酒精提取物(GARLIC)。细菌数量通过菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)进行评估,分为污染:低(300)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法进行检验,显著性水平为 p <0.05。结果显示与阴性对照组(Me = 378,500 和 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 和 6,760,000]: 中/高;p ≤ 0.019)相比,G3 和 G4(Me = 0 [IQR(四分位数间距)= 0]:低)和 G5(Me = 6000 [IQR=45,000]:低/中)的中位数 CFU/mL 较低。G5 的计数与 G3、G4 和 G6 相比没有统计学差异(p > 0.06)。G6(Me = 1,510,000 [IQR=590,000]:中)低于 G3 和 G4(p < 0.001),但与两个阴性对照组相似(p > 0.999)。结论用 CHX、WV 和 MWs 消毒结核菌可显著有效地减少 Ef.TB 的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Vitro Efficacy of Domestic Techniques for Disinfection of Toothbrushes Contaminated With Enterococcus faecalis.

Introduction: Oral hygiene education for patients is fundamental in preventive-promotional dentistry. The disinfection of toothbrushes (TBs) must be integrated into this context due to their proximity to contaminant sources that make them vulnerable to cross infection in homes. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of domestic techniques for disinfection of TBs. Materials and Methods: We performed an in vitro study of 76 TBs contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (Ef) ATCC 29212 subjected to different disinfection protocols: G1. Distilled water (DW; negative control; n = 8), G2. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)10% (negative control; n = 8), G3. Chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.12% (positive control; n = 15), G4. 100% white vinegar (WV; n = 15), G5. Microwave (MW) at 700 W (n = 15), and G6. 200 mg/mL of certified alcoholic extract of purple garlic (GARLIC) from Arequipa (Allium sativum L; n = 15). Bacterial count was assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/mL) categorized as contamination: low (<30), medium (30-300), and high (>300). The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pairs was used at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Efficacy against Ef showed highly significant differences between groups (p < 0.001) with lower median CFU/mL in G3 and G4 (Me = 0 [IQR (interquartile range) = 0]: low) and G5 (Me = 6000 [IQR = 45,000]: low/medium) versus negative controls (Me = 378,500 and 5,020,000 [IQR = 4,605,000 and 6,760,000]: medium/high; p ≤ 0.019). The counts of the G5 were not statistically different than G3, G4, and G6 (p > 0.06). The G6 (Me = 1,510,000 [IQR = 590,000]: medium) was inferior to G3 and G4 (p < 0.001), but similar to both negative control groups (p > 0.999). Conclusions: Disinfection of TBs with CHX, WV, and MWs produces a significant effective reduction in the count of Ef.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Severity of Sleep Bruxism in Edentulous Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Elementary Teacher's Perception of Oral Health Education in a City of the Brazilian Amazon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Endocrowns at Different Depths Fabricated by the Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques: Internal and Marginal Fit of Endocrowns. Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Post Using Various Post Space Irrigation Treatments. Comparison of Histological, Clinical, and Radiographic Outcomes of Postextraction Ridge Preservation by Allogenic Bone Grafting With and Without Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1