利用第二代深度学习重构技术改进心肌合成心动图的定量。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.3390/jcdd11100304
Tsubasa Morioka, Shingo Kato, Ayano Onoma, Toshiharu Izumi, Tomokazu Sakano, Eiji Ishikawa, Shungo Sawamura, Naofumi Yasuda, Hiroaki Nagase, Daisuke Utsunomiya
{"title":"利用第二代深度学习重构技术改进心肌合成心动图的定量。","authors":"Tsubasa Morioka, Shingo Kato, Ayano Onoma, Toshiharu Izumi, Tomokazu Sakano, Eiji Ishikawa, Shungo Sawamura, Naofumi Yasuda, Hiroaki Nagase, Daisuke Utsunomiya","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of synthetic ECV, which does not require hematocrit values, has been reported; however, high-quality CT images are essential for accurate quantification. Second-generation Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) enables low-noise and high-resolution cardiac CT images. The aim of this study is to compare the differences among four reconstruction methods (hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), DLR, and second-generation DLR) in the quantification of synthetic ECV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients who underwent cardiac CT scans, including late contrast-enhanced CT (derivation cohort: <i>n</i> = 40, age 71 ± 12 years, 24 males; validation cohort: <i>n</i> = 40, age 67 ± 11 years, 25 males). In the derivation cohort, a linear regression analysis was performed between the hematocrit values from blood tests and the CT values of the right atrial blood pool on non-contrast CT. In the validation cohort, synthetic hematocrit values were calculated using the linear regression equation and the right atrial CT values from non-contrast CT. The correlation and mean difference between synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV calculated from actual blood tests were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV showed a high correlation across all four reconstruction methods (R ≥ 0.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The bias and limit of agreement (LOA) in the Bland-Altman plot were lowest with the second-generation DLR (hybrid IR: bias = -0.21, LOA: 3.16; MBIR: bias = -0.79, LOA: 2.81; DLR: bias = -1.87, LOA: 2.90; second-generation DLR: bias = -0.20, LOA: 2.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic ECV using second-generation DLR demonstrated the lowest bias and LOA compared to laboratory ECV among the four reconstruction methods, suggesting that second-generation DLR enables more accurate quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Quantification of Myocardial Synthetic ECV with Second-Generation Deep Learning Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Tsubasa Morioka, Shingo Kato, Ayano Onoma, Toshiharu Izumi, Tomokazu Sakano, Eiji Ishikawa, Shungo Sawamura, Naofumi Yasuda, Hiroaki Nagase, Daisuke Utsunomiya\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd11100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of synthetic ECV, which does not require hematocrit values, has been reported; however, high-quality CT images are essential for accurate quantification. Second-generation Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) enables low-noise and high-resolution cardiac CT images. The aim of this study is to compare the differences among four reconstruction methods (hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), DLR, and second-generation DLR) in the quantification of synthetic ECV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients who underwent cardiac CT scans, including late contrast-enhanced CT (derivation cohort: <i>n</i> = 40, age 71 ± 12 years, 24 males; validation cohort: <i>n</i> = 40, age 67 ± 11 years, 25 males). In the derivation cohort, a linear regression analysis was performed between the hematocrit values from blood tests and the CT values of the right atrial blood pool on non-contrast CT. In the validation cohort, synthetic hematocrit values were calculated using the linear regression equation and the right atrial CT values from non-contrast CT. The correlation and mean difference between synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV calculated from actual blood tests were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV showed a high correlation across all four reconstruction methods (R ≥ 0.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The bias and limit of agreement (LOA) in the Bland-Altman plot were lowest with the second-generation DLR (hybrid IR: bias = -0.21, LOA: 3.16; MBIR: bias = -0.79, LOA: 2.81; DLR: bias = -1.87, LOA: 2.90; second-generation DLR: bias = -0.20, LOA: 2.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic ECV using second-generation DLR demonstrated the lowest bias and LOA compared to laboratory ECV among the four reconstruction methods, suggesting that second-generation DLR enables more accurate quantification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11100304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11100304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有报道称,合成 ECV 不需要血细胞比容值,但高质量的 CT 图像对准确量化至关重要。第二代深度学习重建(DLR)可实现低噪声、高分辨率的心脏 CT 图像。本研究旨在比较四种重建方法(混合迭代重建(HIR)、基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)、DLR 和第二代 DLR)在量化合成 ECV 方面的差异:我们回顾性分析了 80 名接受心脏 CT 扫描(包括晚期对比增强 CT)的患者(推导队列:n = 40,年龄 71 ± 12 岁,男性 24 人;验证队列:n = 40,年龄 67 ± 11 岁,男性 25 人)。在推导队列中,对血液检测中的血细胞比容值与非对比 CT 上右心房血池的 CT 值进行了线性回归分析。在验证队列中,使用线性回归方程和非对比 CT 的右心房 CT 值计算合成血细胞比容值。评估了合成 ECV 与实验室实际血液检测计算出的 ECV 之间的相关性和平均差异:在所有四种重建方法中,合成 ECV 和实验室 ECV 都显示出高度相关性(R ≥ 0.95,p < 0.001)。第二代 DLR 在 Bland-Altman 图中的偏差和一致性限值(LOA)最低(混合 IR:偏差 = -0.21,LOA:3.16;MBIR:偏差 = -0.79,LOA:2.81;DLR:偏差 = -1.87,LOA:2.90;第二代 DLR:偏差 = -0.20,LOA:2.35):结论:在四种重建方法中,使用第二代 DLR 的合成 ECV 与实验室 ECV 相比,偏差和 LOA 最低,这表明第二代 DLR 能够实现更准确的量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement of Quantification of Myocardial Synthetic ECV with Second-Generation Deep Learning Reconstruction.

Background: The utility of synthetic ECV, which does not require hematocrit values, has been reported; however, high-quality CT images are essential for accurate quantification. Second-generation Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) enables low-noise and high-resolution cardiac CT images. The aim of this study is to compare the differences among four reconstruction methods (hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), DLR, and second-generation DLR) in the quantification of synthetic ECV.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients who underwent cardiac CT scans, including late contrast-enhanced CT (derivation cohort: n = 40, age 71 ± 12 years, 24 males; validation cohort: n = 40, age 67 ± 11 years, 25 males). In the derivation cohort, a linear regression analysis was performed between the hematocrit values from blood tests and the CT values of the right atrial blood pool on non-contrast CT. In the validation cohort, synthetic hematocrit values were calculated using the linear regression equation and the right atrial CT values from non-contrast CT. The correlation and mean difference between synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV calculated from actual blood tests were assessed.

Results: Synthetic ECV and laboratory ECV showed a high correlation across all four reconstruction methods (R ≥ 0.95, p < 0.001). The bias and limit of agreement (LOA) in the Bland-Altman plot were lowest with the second-generation DLR (hybrid IR: bias = -0.21, LOA: 3.16; MBIR: bias = -0.79, LOA: 2.81; DLR: bias = -1.87, LOA: 2.90; second-generation DLR: bias = -0.20, LOA: 2.35).

Conclusions: Synthetic ECV using second-generation DLR demonstrated the lowest bias and LOA compared to laboratory ECV among the four reconstruction methods, suggesting that second-generation DLR enables more accurate quantification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
A Rare Presentation of Infective Endocarditis Complicating Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis. Potential Role of Polyphenols in Platelet Aggregation and Blood Coagulation. Recurrent Pericarditis in a Middle-Aged Female with MEFV Mutation. Incidence and Predictive Factors for Surgical Interventions Following Simple Congenital Heart Disease Interventional Transcatheter/Interventional Procedure. Inferior Left Atrial Diverticulum Communicating with the Right Atrium or Inferior Vena Cava: Prevalence and CT Features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1