同时测量发生压力溶解的方解石晶粒包中的应变和化学反应速率:表面反应控制溶解的证据

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.018
Harrison Lisabeth, Donald J. DePaolo, Nicholas J. Pester, John N. Christensen
{"title":"同时测量发生压力溶解的方解石晶粒包中的应变和化学反应速率:表面反应控制溶解的证据","authors":"Harrison Lisabeth,&nbsp;Donald J. DePaolo,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Pester,&nbsp;John N. Christensen","doi":"10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pressure solution is inferred to be a significant contributor to sediment compaction and lithification, especially in carbonate sediments. For a sediment deforming primarily by pressure solution, the compaction rate should be directly related to the rate of calcite dissolution, transport along grain contacts, and calcite reprecipitation. Previous experimental work has shown that there is evidence that deformation in wet calcite grain packs is consistent with control by pressure solution, but considerable ambiguity remains regarding the rate limiting mechanism. We present the results of laboratory compaction experiments designed to directly measure calcite dissolution and precipitation rates (recrystallization rates) concurrently with strain rate to test whether measured rates are consistent with predicted rates both in absolute magnitude and time evolution. Recrystallization rates are measured using trace element chemistry (Sr/Ca, Mg/Ca) and isotopes (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) of fluids flowing slowly through a compacting grain pack as it is being triaxially compressed. Imaging techniques are used to characterize the grain contacts and strain effects in the post-experiment grain pack. Our data show that calcite recrystallization rates calculated from all three geochemical parameters are in approximate agreement and that the rates closely track strain rate. The geochemically inferred rates are close to predicted rates in absolute magnitude. Uncertainty in grain contact dimensions makes distinguishing between surface reaction control and diffusion control difficult. Measured reaction rates decrease faster than predicted from standard pressure solution creep flow laws. This inconsistency may indicate that calcite dissolution rates at grain contacts are more complex, and more time-dependent, than suggested by geometric models designed to predict grain contact stresses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":327,"journal":{"name":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","volume":"385 ","pages":"Pages 184-198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent measurement of strain and chemical reaction rates in a calcite grain pack undergoing pressure solution: Evidence for surface-reaction controlled dissolution\",\"authors\":\"Harrison Lisabeth,&nbsp;Donald J. DePaolo,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Pester,&nbsp;John N. Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pressure solution is inferred to be a significant contributor to sediment compaction and lithification, especially in carbonate sediments. For a sediment deforming primarily by pressure solution, the compaction rate should be directly related to the rate of calcite dissolution, transport along grain contacts, and calcite reprecipitation. Previous experimental work has shown that there is evidence that deformation in wet calcite grain packs is consistent with control by pressure solution, but considerable ambiguity remains regarding the rate limiting mechanism. We present the results of laboratory compaction experiments designed to directly measure calcite dissolution and precipitation rates (recrystallization rates) concurrently with strain rate to test whether measured rates are consistent with predicted rates both in absolute magnitude and time evolution. Recrystallization rates are measured using trace element chemistry (Sr/Ca, Mg/Ca) and isotopes (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) of fluids flowing slowly through a compacting grain pack as it is being triaxially compressed. Imaging techniques are used to characterize the grain contacts and strain effects in the post-experiment grain pack. Our data show that calcite recrystallization rates calculated from all three geochemical parameters are in approximate agreement and that the rates closely track strain rate. The geochemically inferred rates are close to predicted rates in absolute magnitude. Uncertainty in grain contact dimensions makes distinguishing between surface reaction control and diffusion control difficult. Measured reaction rates decrease faster than predicted from standard pressure solution creep flow laws. This inconsistency may indicate that calcite dissolution rates at grain contacts are more complex, and more time-dependent, than suggested by geometric models designed to predict grain contact stresses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703724005015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703724005015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据推断,压力溶蚀是沉积物(尤其是碳酸盐沉积物)压实和岩化的重要因素。对于主要通过压力溶解变形的沉积物来说,压实率应与方解石溶解率、沿晶粒接触迁移率和方解石再沉淀率直接相关。之前的实验工作表明,有证据表明湿方解石晶粒包的变形与压力溶液的控制是一致的,但在速率限制机制方面仍存在相当大的模糊性。我们展示了实验室压实实验的结果,这些实验旨在直接测量方解石的溶解和沉淀速率(再结晶速率)以及应变速率,以检验测量速率与预测速率在绝对值和时间演化方面是否一致。再结晶速率是利用三轴压缩过程中缓慢流经压实晶粒包的流体的痕量元素化学(Sr/Ca、Mg/Ca)和同位素(87Sr/86Sr)进行测量的。成像技术用于描述实验后晶粒包中的晶粒接触和应变效应。我们的数据显示,根据所有三个地球化学参数计算出的方解石再结晶速率大致吻合,而且这些速率与应变速率密切相关。地球化学推断速率的绝对值接近预测速率。由于晶粒接触尺寸的不确定性,很难区分表面反应控制和扩散控制。测量到的反应速率比标准压力溶液蠕变流动规律预测的速率下降得更快。这种不一致可能表明,晶粒接触处的方解石溶解速率比用于预测晶粒接触应力的几何模型所预测的更复杂,也更受时间影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concurrent measurement of strain and chemical reaction rates in a calcite grain pack undergoing pressure solution: Evidence for surface-reaction controlled dissolution
Pressure solution is inferred to be a significant contributor to sediment compaction and lithification, especially in carbonate sediments. For a sediment deforming primarily by pressure solution, the compaction rate should be directly related to the rate of calcite dissolution, transport along grain contacts, and calcite reprecipitation. Previous experimental work has shown that there is evidence that deformation in wet calcite grain packs is consistent with control by pressure solution, but considerable ambiguity remains regarding the rate limiting mechanism. We present the results of laboratory compaction experiments designed to directly measure calcite dissolution and precipitation rates (recrystallization rates) concurrently with strain rate to test whether measured rates are consistent with predicted rates both in absolute magnitude and time evolution. Recrystallization rates are measured using trace element chemistry (Sr/Ca, Mg/Ca) and isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) of fluids flowing slowly through a compacting grain pack as it is being triaxially compressed. Imaging techniques are used to characterize the grain contacts and strain effects in the post-experiment grain pack. Our data show that calcite recrystallization rates calculated from all three geochemical parameters are in approximate agreement and that the rates closely track strain rate. The geochemically inferred rates are close to predicted rates in absolute magnitude. Uncertainty in grain contact dimensions makes distinguishing between surface reaction control and diffusion control difficult. Measured reaction rates decrease faster than predicted from standard pressure solution creep flow laws. This inconsistency may indicate that calcite dissolution rates at grain contacts are more complex, and more time-dependent, than suggested by geometric models designed to predict grain contact stresses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
437
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta publishes research papers in a wide range of subjects in terrestrial geochemistry, meteoritics, and planetary geochemistry. The scope of the journal includes: 1). Physical chemistry of gases, aqueous solutions, glasses, and crystalline solids 2). Igneous and metamorphic petrology 3). Chemical processes in the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere of the Earth 4). Organic geochemistry 5). Isotope geochemistry 6). Meteoritics and meteorite impacts 7). Lunar science; and 8). Planetary geochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Fe-isotopic evidence for hydrothermal reworking as a mechanism to form high-grade Fe-Ti-V oxide ores in layered intrusions Copper isotopic evidence of microbial gold fixation in the Mesoarchean Witwatersrand Basin The partitioning of chalcophile and siderophile elements (CSEs) between sulfide liquid and carbonated melt An oxygen fugacity-temperature-pressure-composition model for sulfide speciation in Mercurian magmas Layer-to-tunnel manganese oxides transformation triggered by pyrogenic carbon and trace metals: Key role of reducing and oxidizing components cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1