非工作地点乘车出行时间的差异

Sicheng Wang , Robert B. Noland , Xiao Huang
{"title":"非工作地点乘车出行时间的差异","authors":"Sicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Robert B. Noland ,&nbsp;Xiao Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We contribute to the literature on new mobilities by measuring spatial disparities in travel times for accessing essential non-work destinations via ridehailing. We focused on healthcare, restaurants, and grocery destinations in Chicago. Data from Chicago ridehailing providers, which included detailed information about all realized ridehailing trips in Chicago, were used to derive mean travel times by ridehailing for each census tract. Inspired by the gravity-based model, we calculated an inverse travel time index based on cumulative travel times for each census tract where ridehailing trips occurred. To understand the disparities in travel times, we compared the inverse travel time index for ridehailing and transit in the same census tracts. Then, we applied spatial autoregressive regression to examine the effects of various sociodemographic factors. The results suggested that the inverse travel time index was preferable in tracts with a higher household income and a lower percentage of minority populations. Also, disparities in travel times tended to be greater via ridehailing than transit. This study sheds light on disparities related to ridehailing and how we could improve access to essential destinations for underserved and underrepresented populations and communities. Policy implications include subsidizing disadvantaged users who lack reliable transportation options, regulating ridehailing prices, increasing the provision of essential destinations for underserved areas, and maintaining the quality of public transit services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations\",\"authors\":\"Sicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Robert B. Noland ,&nbsp;Xiao Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We contribute to the literature on new mobilities by measuring spatial disparities in travel times for accessing essential non-work destinations via ridehailing. We focused on healthcare, restaurants, and grocery destinations in Chicago. Data from Chicago ridehailing providers, which included detailed information about all realized ridehailing trips in Chicago, were used to derive mean travel times by ridehailing for each census tract. Inspired by the gravity-based model, we calculated an inverse travel time index based on cumulative travel times for each census tract where ridehailing trips occurred. To understand the disparities in travel times, we compared the inverse travel time index for ridehailing and transit in the same census tracts. Then, we applied spatial autoregressive regression to examine the effects of various sociodemographic factors. The results suggested that the inverse travel time index was preferable in tracts with a higher household income and a lower percentage of minority populations. Also, disparities in travel times tended to be greater via ridehailing than transit. This study sheds light on disparities related to ridehailing and how we could improve access to essential destinations for underserved and underrepresented populations and communities. Policy implications include subsidizing disadvantaged users who lack reliable transportation options, regulating ridehailing prices, increasing the provision of essential destinations for underserved areas, and maintaining the quality of public transit services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过测量通过打车服务到达基本非工作目的地的出行时间的空间差异,为有关新出行方式的文献做出了贡献。我们重点研究了芝加哥的医疗保健、餐馆和杂货店等目的地。芝加哥打车服务提供商提供的数据包含了芝加哥所有已实现的打车出行的详细信息,我们利用这些数据得出了每个人口普查区的平均打车出行时间。受重力模型的启发,我们根据每个人口普查区发生的打车出行的累计出行时间,计算出一个逆出行时间指数。为了解出行时间的差异,我们比较了同一人口普查区内打车出行和公交出行的逆出行时间指数。然后,我们运用空间自回归分析了各种社会人口因素的影响。结果表明,在家庭收入较高、少数民族人口比例较低的地区,逆旅行时间指数更受欢迎。此外,乘车时间的差异往往大于乘公交车。这项研究揭示了与打车出行相关的差异,以及我们可以如何改善服务不足和代表性不足的人群和社区到达重要目的地的交通状况。对政策的影响包括为缺乏可靠交通选择的弱势用户提供补贴、对打车价格进行监管、为服务不足地区提供更多基本目的地服务,以及保持公共交通服务的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations
We contribute to the literature on new mobilities by measuring spatial disparities in travel times for accessing essential non-work destinations via ridehailing. We focused on healthcare, restaurants, and grocery destinations in Chicago. Data from Chicago ridehailing providers, which included detailed information about all realized ridehailing trips in Chicago, were used to derive mean travel times by ridehailing for each census tract. Inspired by the gravity-based model, we calculated an inverse travel time index based on cumulative travel times for each census tract where ridehailing trips occurred. To understand the disparities in travel times, we compared the inverse travel time index for ridehailing and transit in the same census tracts. Then, we applied spatial autoregressive regression to examine the effects of various sociodemographic factors. The results suggested that the inverse travel time index was preferable in tracts with a higher household income and a lower percentage of minority populations. Also, disparities in travel times tended to be greater via ridehailing than transit. This study sheds light on disparities related to ridehailing and how we could improve access to essential destinations for underserved and underrepresented populations and communities. Policy implications include subsidizing disadvantaged users who lack reliable transportation options, regulating ridehailing prices, increasing the provision of essential destinations for underserved areas, and maintaining the quality of public transit services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1