押金退还制度在关闭塑料饮料瓶循环方面的潜力:综述

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107962
Caterina Picuno , Spyridoula Gerassimidou , Weimu You , Olwenn Martin , Eleni Iacovidou
{"title":"押金退还制度在关闭塑料饮料瓶循环方面的潜力:综述","authors":"Caterina Picuno ,&nbsp;Spyridoula Gerassimidou ,&nbsp;Weimu You ,&nbsp;Olwenn Martin ,&nbsp;Eleni Iacovidou","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This critical review assesses the implementation and impact of Deposit Return Schemes (DRSs), also referred to as ‘Deposit Refund Systems’ and ‘Deposit Return Systems’ in international contexts, focusing on plastic beverage bottles. The review explores the multi-dimensional challenges that shape effective DRS implementation. A total of 143 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature studies were analysed based on DRS definitions, scope, year of implementation, materials involved, and impacts across multiple dimensions (technical, social, economic, regulatory, and environmental). Emphasising Europe, the study outlines the multi-dimensional challenges and opportunities associated with DRSs. Key findings highlight the critical importance of balancing redemption locations, deposit values, and public awareness, as reflected in varying return rates in different countries. While industry stakeholders advocate for standardising DRS models to maximise economic and technical value in the plastic bottle value chain, significant European-wide and regional-specific challenges such as harmonizing legal requirements, potential trade-offs, and addressing environmental and transportation costs, persist. This underscores the ongoing need for evaluation and refinement of DRS implementation strategies within evolving waste management practices. As the first of its kind, this study underscores the necessity for future research to inform the sustainability assessment of DRS, policy development, and efforts to promote social accountability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107962"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential of Deposit Refund Systems in closing the plastic beverage bottle loop: A review\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Picuno ,&nbsp;Spyridoula Gerassimidou ,&nbsp;Weimu You ,&nbsp;Olwenn Martin ,&nbsp;Eleni Iacovidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This critical review assesses the implementation and impact of Deposit Return Schemes (DRSs), also referred to as ‘Deposit Refund Systems’ and ‘Deposit Return Systems’ in international contexts, focusing on plastic beverage bottles. The review explores the multi-dimensional challenges that shape effective DRS implementation. A total of 143 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature studies were analysed based on DRS definitions, scope, year of implementation, materials involved, and impacts across multiple dimensions (technical, social, economic, regulatory, and environmental). Emphasising Europe, the study outlines the multi-dimensional challenges and opportunities associated with DRSs. Key findings highlight the critical importance of balancing redemption locations, deposit values, and public awareness, as reflected in varying return rates in different countries. While industry stakeholders advocate for standardising DRS models to maximise economic and technical value in the plastic bottle value chain, significant European-wide and regional-specific challenges such as harmonizing legal requirements, potential trade-offs, and addressing environmental and transportation costs, persist. This underscores the ongoing need for evaluation and refinement of DRS implementation strategies within evolving waste management practices. As the first of its kind, this study underscores the necessity for future research to inform the sustainability assessment of DRS, policy development, and efforts to promote social accountability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005536\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本评论以塑料饮料瓶为重点,评估了押金退还计划(DRSs)(在国际上也称为 "押金退款制度 "和 "押金退还制度")的实施情况和影响。综述探讨了影响有效实施 DRS 的多方面挑战。根据 DRS 的定义、范围、实施年份、涉及的材料以及对多个方面(技术、社会、经济、监管和环境)的影响,共分析了 143 篇经同行评审的文章和灰色文献研究。本研究以欧洲为重点,概述了与 DRS 相关的多维挑战和机遇。主要研究结果强调了平衡兑换地点、押金价值和公众意识的重要性,这反映在不同国家不同的返还率上。虽然行业利益相关者主张对 DRS 模式进行标准化,以最大限度地提高塑料瓶价值链中的经济和技术价值,但全欧洲和特定地区仍然面临着重大挑战,如统一法律要求、潜在的权衡以及解决环境和运输成本问题。这凸显了在不断发展的废物管理实践中评估和完善 DRS 实施战略的持续必要性。作为同类研究中的第一项,本研究强调了未来研究的必要性,以便为 DRS 的可持续性评估、政策制定和促进社会问责制的努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The potential of Deposit Refund Systems in closing the plastic beverage bottle loop: A review
This critical review assesses the implementation and impact of Deposit Return Schemes (DRSs), also referred to as ‘Deposit Refund Systems’ and ‘Deposit Return Systems’ in international contexts, focusing on plastic beverage bottles. The review explores the multi-dimensional challenges that shape effective DRS implementation. A total of 143 peer-reviewed articles and grey literature studies were analysed based on DRS definitions, scope, year of implementation, materials involved, and impacts across multiple dimensions (technical, social, economic, regulatory, and environmental). Emphasising Europe, the study outlines the multi-dimensional challenges and opportunities associated with DRSs. Key findings highlight the critical importance of balancing redemption locations, deposit values, and public awareness, as reflected in varying return rates in different countries. While industry stakeholders advocate for standardising DRS models to maximise economic and technical value in the plastic bottle value chain, significant European-wide and regional-specific challenges such as harmonizing legal requirements, potential trade-offs, and addressing environmental and transportation costs, persist. This underscores the ongoing need for evaluation and refinement of DRS implementation strategies within evolving waste management practices. As the first of its kind, this study underscores the necessity for future research to inform the sustainability assessment of DRS, policy development, and efforts to promote social accountability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development of sustainable high-performance desert sand concrete: Engineering and environmental impacts of compression casting Stability of China's terrestrial ecosystems carbon sink during 2000-2020 Self-sufficiency of the European Union in critical raw materials for E-mobility Assessing the environmental and economic impacts of intracity express delivery: Pathways for carbon reduction and cost efficiency in China Selective anchoring of phosphate groups coupled with swift interlayer cation exchange for record-high capacity cobalt adsorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1