上层房间紫外线诱导器和吸顶式空气净化器在去除活性生物气溶胶方面的组合性能

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building and Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112230
Zongkun Li , Xiaoqian Ma , Yanfen Liao
{"title":"上层房间紫外线诱导器和吸顶式空气净化器在去除活性生物气溶胶方面的组合性能","authors":"Zongkun Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Ma ,&nbsp;Yanfen Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UR-UVGI) and ceiling-mounted air cleaner (CM-AC) technologies contribute to curbing the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. However, there is a lack of detailed studies on the performance differences between these two control technologies for reducing viral concentrations and infection risk in isolation ward environments with different ventilation modes, especially when used alone versus in combination. Therefore, this study performed numerical simulations under three ventilation modes, namely, downward ventilation (DWV), stratum ventilation (SV), and displacement ventilation (DV), by the Eulerian-Lagrangian method combined with the UV inactivation model. The viral disinfection performance of UR-UVGI and CM-AC was parametrically analyzed. The effectiveness of the combined application of these two control technologies in wards was evaluated. The results showed that expanding the irradiation range was more effective in enhancing the UR-UVGI performance with the same total UV flux. When using UR-UVGI only, DWV disinfected better at the same irradiation flux. In CM-AC cases, the viral aerosol removal efficiency was the greatest in DV. UR-UVGI and CM-AC had advantages in active bioaerosol removal in overall and localized indoor spaces, respectively. The combined application was recommended to maximize the air cleanliness. Under the role of UR-UVGI, a high level of disinfection could be achieved using CM-AC with low ventilation rates. When the CM-AC ventilation rate was 150 m<sup>3</sup>/h and the UV irradiance was 30 μW/cm<sup>2</sup>, the viral disinfection of DV exceeded 90 %, while that of DWV was also close to 90 %. The findings could provide insights to further lower the transmission risk of infectious diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined performance of upper-room UVGI and ceiling-mounted air cleaners for removing active bioaerosol\",\"authors\":\"Zongkun Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Ma ,&nbsp;Yanfen Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UR-UVGI) and ceiling-mounted air cleaner (CM-AC) technologies contribute to curbing the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. However, there is a lack of detailed studies on the performance differences between these two control technologies for reducing viral concentrations and infection risk in isolation ward environments with different ventilation modes, especially when used alone versus in combination. Therefore, this study performed numerical simulations under three ventilation modes, namely, downward ventilation (DWV), stratum ventilation (SV), and displacement ventilation (DV), by the Eulerian-Lagrangian method combined with the UV inactivation model. The viral disinfection performance of UR-UVGI and CM-AC was parametrically analyzed. The effectiveness of the combined application of these two control technologies in wards was evaluated. The results showed that expanding the irradiation range was more effective in enhancing the UR-UVGI performance with the same total UV flux. When using UR-UVGI only, DWV disinfected better at the same irradiation flux. In CM-AC cases, the viral aerosol removal efficiency was the greatest in DV. UR-UVGI and CM-AC had advantages in active bioaerosol removal in overall and localized indoor spaces, respectively. The combined application was recommended to maximize the air cleanliness. Under the role of UR-UVGI, a high level of disinfection could be achieved using CM-AC with low ventilation rates. When the CM-AC ventilation rate was 150 m<sup>3</sup>/h and the UV irradiance was 30 μW/cm<sup>2</sup>, the viral disinfection of DV exceeded 90 %, while that of DWV was also close to 90 %. The findings could provide insights to further lower the transmission risk of infectious diseases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324010722\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324010722","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病房上部紫外线杀菌照射(UR-UVGI)和天花板安装式空气净化器(CM-AC)技术有助于遏制 COVID-19 等传染病的传播。然而,对于这两种控制技术在不同通风模式的隔离病房环境中降低病毒浓度和感染风险的性能差异,尤其是单独使用与联合使用时的性能差异,目前还缺乏详细的研究。因此,本研究采用欧拉-拉格朗日方法,结合紫外线灭活模型,对向下通风(DWV)、分层通风(SV)和置换通风(DV)三种通风模式进行了数值模拟。对 UR-UVGI 和 CM-AC 的病毒消毒性能进行了参数分析。对这两种控制技术在病房中的联合应用效果进行了评估。结果表明,在总紫外线通量相同的情况下,扩大辐照范围能更有效地提高 UR-UVGI 的性能。仅使用 UR-UVGI 时,在相同的辐照通量下,DWV 的消毒效果更好。在 CM-AC 案例中,DV 的病毒气溶胶去除效率最高。UR-UVGI 和 CM-AC 分别在整体和局部室内空间的活性生物气溶胶去除方面具有优势。建议联合使用,以最大限度地提高空气洁净度。在 UR-UVGI 的作用下,使用 CM-AC 可以在低通风率的情况下实现高水平的消毒。当 CM-AC 通风率为 150 m3/h、紫外线辐照度为 30 μW/cm2 时,DV 的病毒消毒率超过 90%,而 DWV 的病毒消毒率也接近 90%。这些发现可为进一步降低传染病的传播风险提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combined performance of upper-room UVGI and ceiling-mounted air cleaners for removing active bioaerosol
Upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UR-UVGI) and ceiling-mounted air cleaner (CM-AC) technologies contribute to curbing the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. However, there is a lack of detailed studies on the performance differences between these two control technologies for reducing viral concentrations and infection risk in isolation ward environments with different ventilation modes, especially when used alone versus in combination. Therefore, this study performed numerical simulations under three ventilation modes, namely, downward ventilation (DWV), stratum ventilation (SV), and displacement ventilation (DV), by the Eulerian-Lagrangian method combined with the UV inactivation model. The viral disinfection performance of UR-UVGI and CM-AC was parametrically analyzed. The effectiveness of the combined application of these two control technologies in wards was evaluated. The results showed that expanding the irradiation range was more effective in enhancing the UR-UVGI performance with the same total UV flux. When using UR-UVGI only, DWV disinfected better at the same irradiation flux. In CM-AC cases, the viral aerosol removal efficiency was the greatest in DV. UR-UVGI and CM-AC had advantages in active bioaerosol removal in overall and localized indoor spaces, respectively. The combined application was recommended to maximize the air cleanliness. Under the role of UR-UVGI, a high level of disinfection could be achieved using CM-AC with low ventilation rates. When the CM-AC ventilation rate was 150 m3/h and the UV irradiance was 30 μW/cm2, the viral disinfection of DV exceeded 90 %, while that of DWV was also close to 90 %. The findings could provide insights to further lower the transmission risk of infectious diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Explainable AI-driven high-fidelity IAQ prediction (HiFi-IAQ) model for subway stations: Spatiotemporal outdoor air quality interpolation using geographic data” Corrigendum to “A two-part model for evaluation of thermal neutrality for sleeping people” Stochastic model predictive control for the optimal operation of office buildings Analysis of ventilation and infiltration rates using physics-informed neural networks: Impact of space operation and meteorological factors Corrigendum to “Ten questions concerning First Nations on-reserve housing in Canada”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1