乳腺癌新辅助化疗:一个地区癌症中心的回顾性路径评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/imj.16560
Lachlan Fitzpatrick, Jan Ho, Sabe Sabesan, Dinuka Ariyarathna, Corinne Ryan, Zulfiquer Otty, Nathan Bain, Joanne Tan, Amy Brown, Abhishek Joshi, Shivanshan Pathmanathan
{"title":"乳腺癌新辅助化疗:一个地区癌症中心的回顾性路径评估。","authors":"Lachlan Fitzpatrick, Jan Ho, Sabe Sabesan, Dinuka Ariyarathna, Corinne Ryan, Zulfiquer Otty, Nathan Bain, Joanne Tan, Amy Brown, Abhishek Joshi, Shivanshan Pathmanathan","doi":"10.1111/imj.16560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal care pathway (OCP) for people with breast cancer provides a framework for investigation and management of patients with breast cancer, with delays previously identified regionally.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>With emphasis on the neoadjuvant pathway, the primary aim of this study was to assess the practicality of implementing the breast cancer OCP timeframes regionally in comparison to nationally referenced standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective institutional audit was performed for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. The time from referral to specialist review, completion of investigations, discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and surgery were calculated and compared to OCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included, with 19 patients living rurally (36%). Twenty-four patients (45%) were seen by a specialist surgeon within 2 weeks of referral. Following surgical review, 44 patients (83%) completed investigations within 2 weeks, and 43 patient cases (81%) were discussed at MDT meetings within 2 weeks. Forty-eight patients (91%) were commenced on neoadjuvant treatment within 4 weeks of decision to treat, and 43 patients (81%) underwent surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment completion. Delays from initial referral to NACT were more frequent in rural patients compared to urban (79% vs 94%, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to OCP timeframes for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy in a regional centre was feasible and strategies are needed to bridge gaps identified for rural patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a retrospective pathway assessment in a regional cancer centre.\",\"authors\":\"Lachlan Fitzpatrick, Jan Ho, Sabe Sabesan, Dinuka Ariyarathna, Corinne Ryan, Zulfiquer Otty, Nathan Bain, Joanne Tan, Amy Brown, Abhishek Joshi, Shivanshan Pathmanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.16560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal care pathway (OCP) for people with breast cancer provides a framework for investigation and management of patients with breast cancer, with delays previously identified regionally.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>With emphasis on the neoadjuvant pathway, the primary aim of this study was to assess the practicality of implementing the breast cancer OCP timeframes regionally in comparison to nationally referenced standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective institutional audit was performed for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. The time from referral to specialist review, completion of investigations, discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and surgery were calculated and compared to OCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were included, with 19 patients living rurally (36%). Twenty-four patients (45%) were seen by a specialist surgeon within 2 weeks of referral. Following surgical review, 44 patients (83%) completed investigations within 2 weeks, and 43 patient cases (81%) were discussed at MDT meetings within 2 weeks. Forty-eight patients (91%) were commenced on neoadjuvant treatment within 4 weeks of decision to treat, and 43 patients (81%) underwent surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment completion. Delays from initial referral to NACT were more frequent in rural patients compared to urban (79% vs 94%, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to OCP timeframes for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy in a regional centre was feasible and strategies are needed to bridge gaps identified for rural patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对乳腺癌患者的最佳治疗路径(OCP)为乳腺癌患者的调查和管理提供了一个框架,之前已确定了各地区的延迟情况。目的:本研究以新辅助治疗路径为重点,主要目的是评估各地区实施乳腺癌OCP时间框架的实用性,并与国家参考标准进行比较:方法:对接受乳腺癌新辅助治疗的患者进行回顾性机构审计。方法:对接受乳腺癌新辅助治疗的患者进行回顾性机构审计,计算从转诊到专家复查、完成检查、多学科小组(MDT)会议讨论、开始新辅助化疗(NACT)和手术的时间,并与 OCP 进行比较:共纳入 53 名患者,其中 19 名患者(36%)居住在偏远地区。24名患者(45%)在转诊后两周内接受了专科医生的诊治。手术复查后,44 名患者(83%)在 2 周内完成了检查,43 例患者(81%)在 2 周内的多学科小组会议上进行了讨论。48名患者(91%)在决定治疗后4周内开始接受新辅助治疗,43名患者(81%)在新辅助治疗结束后6周内接受了手术。与城市患者相比,农村患者从最初转诊到接受新辅助治疗的延迟时间更长(79% 对 94%,P 结论:农村患者从最初转诊到接受新辅助治疗的延迟时间更长(79% 对 94%,P 结论):在一个地区中心接受新辅助治疗的患者遵守OCP时间框架是可行的,但需要制定策略来缩小农村患者的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a retrospective pathway assessment in a regional cancer centre.

Background: The optimal care pathway (OCP) for people with breast cancer provides a framework for investigation and management of patients with breast cancer, with delays previously identified regionally.

Aim: With emphasis on the neoadjuvant pathway, the primary aim of this study was to assess the practicality of implementing the breast cancer OCP timeframes regionally in comparison to nationally referenced standards.

Methods: A retrospective institutional audit was performed for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. The time from referral to specialist review, completion of investigations, discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and surgery were calculated and compared to OCP.

Results: Fifty-three patients were included, with 19 patients living rurally (36%). Twenty-four patients (45%) were seen by a specialist surgeon within 2 weeks of referral. Following surgical review, 44 patients (83%) completed investigations within 2 weeks, and 43 patient cases (81%) were discussed at MDT meetings within 2 weeks. Forty-eight patients (91%) were commenced on neoadjuvant treatment within 4 weeks of decision to treat, and 43 patients (81%) underwent surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment completion. Delays from initial referral to NACT were more frequent in rural patients compared to urban (79% vs 94%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Adherence to OCP timeframes for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy in a regional centre was feasible and strategies are needed to bridge gaps identified for rural patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
Final results of the National Oncology Mentorship Program 2023 and its impact on burnout and professional fulfilment. Platelet factor 4 immune disease: medical emergencies that look like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Correction to: 'Managing cancer-related pain in the setting of proven IgE-mediated opioid anaphylaxis'. Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. Environmental impact of large language models in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1