评估 ChatGPT 支持对肢端肥大症管理和患者教育的影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-04086-7
Ekin Yiğit Köroğlu, Reyhan Ersoy, Muhammed Saçıkara, Fatma Dilek Dellal Kahramanca, Şefika Burçak Polat, Oya Topaloğlu, Bekir Çakır
{"title":"评估 ChatGPT 支持对肢端肥大症管理和患者教育的影响。","authors":"Ekin Yiğit Köroğlu, Reyhan Ersoy, Muhammed Saçıkara, Fatma Dilek Dellal Kahramanca, Şefika Burçak Polat, Oya Topaloğlu, Bekir Çakır","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-04086-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>ChatGPT is a widely used artificial intelligence modeling tool. Healthcare is one potential area of use of ChatGPT. This study aimed to test the usability and reliability of ChatGPT in acromegaly, which is less known in society and should be evaluated by a group of specialized physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is designed in two parts. For the first part, 35 questions regarding acromegaly that patients frequently ask were identified, and these questions were asked to ChatGPT. In the second part, four patient examples were presented to ChatGPT using medical terminology. Three experts evaluated ChatGPT's answers to the questions and approaches in case management using 7-point scales in terms of safety, reliability, correctness, and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the ChatGPT answers to the patient's questions were evaluated, a mean score of 6.78 ± 0.55 was given for correctness and 6.69 ± 0.60 for reliability. The mean scores given by the raters for correctness, safety and usability in the evaluation of the cases were as follows: 6.33 ± 0.88, 6.16 ± 0. 71 and 6.08 ± 0.79 points for case 1; 5.35 ± 1.88, 5.29 ± 1.80 and 5.20 ± 1.86 points for case 2; 6.08 ± 0.97, 6.00 ± 0.93 and 5.91 ± 0.82 points for case 3; 6.10 ± 1.29, 6.13 ± 1.30 and 6.16 ± 1.14 points for case 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT can actively answer the questions of acromegaly patients. Although it is not a reliable source alone in managing patients with acromegaly, it can be a supportive tool for physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the impact Of ChatGPT support on acromegaly management and patient education.\",\"authors\":\"Ekin Yiğit Köroğlu, Reyhan Ersoy, Muhammed Saçıkara, Fatma Dilek Dellal Kahramanca, Şefika Burçak Polat, Oya Topaloğlu, Bekir Çakır\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-024-04086-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>ChatGPT is a widely used artificial intelligence modeling tool. Healthcare is one potential area of use of ChatGPT. This study aimed to test the usability and reliability of ChatGPT in acromegaly, which is less known in society and should be evaluated by a group of specialized physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is designed in two parts. For the first part, 35 questions regarding acromegaly that patients frequently ask were identified, and these questions were asked to ChatGPT. In the second part, four patient examples were presented to ChatGPT using medical terminology. Three experts evaluated ChatGPT's answers to the questions and approaches in case management using 7-point scales in terms of safety, reliability, correctness, and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the ChatGPT answers to the patient's questions were evaluated, a mean score of 6.78 ± 0.55 was given for correctness and 6.69 ± 0.60 for reliability. The mean scores given by the raters for correctness, safety and usability in the evaluation of the cases were as follows: 6.33 ± 0.88, 6.16 ± 0. 71 and 6.08 ± 0.79 points for case 1; 5.35 ± 1.88, 5.29 ± 1.80 and 5.20 ± 1.86 points for case 2; 6.08 ± 0.97, 6.00 ± 0.93 and 5.91 ± 0.82 points for case 3; 6.10 ± 1.29, 6.13 ± 1.30 and 6.16 ± 1.14 points for case 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT can actively answer the questions of acromegaly patients. Although it is not a reliable source alone in managing patients with acromegaly, it can be a supportive tool for physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04086-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04086-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:ChatGPT 是一种广泛使用的人工智能建模工具。医疗保健是 ChatGPT 的一个潜在应用领域。本研究旨在测试 ChatGPT 在肢端肥大症中的可用性和可靠性:研究分为两部分。在第一部分中,确定了患者经常提出的有关肢端肥大症的 35 个问题,并将这些问题输入 ChatGPT。在第二部分中,使用医学术语向 ChatGPT 介绍了四个患者案例。三位专家从安全性、可靠性、正确性和可用性等方面,使用 7 点量表对 ChatGPT 的问题解答和病例管理方法进行了评估:在对 ChatGPT 回答患者问题的情况进行评估时,正确性的平均得分为 6.78 ± 0.55,可靠性的平均得分为 6.69 ± 0.60。在对病例的评估中,评分者对正确性、安全性和可用性给出的平均分如下:6.33 ± 0.88, 6.16 ± 0.71和6.08±0.79分;案例2为5.35±1.88、5.29±1.80和5.20±1.86分;案例3为6.08±0.97、6.00±0.93和5.91±0.82分;案例4为6.10±1.29、6.13±1.30和6.16±1.14分:ChatGPT 可以积极回答肢端肥大症患者的问题。虽然它不是管理肢端肥大症患者的唯一可靠来源,但可以成为医生的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the impact Of ChatGPT support on acromegaly management and patient education.

Purpose: ChatGPT is a widely used artificial intelligence modeling tool. Healthcare is one potential area of use of ChatGPT. This study aimed to test the usability and reliability of ChatGPT in acromegaly, which is less known in society and should be evaluated by a group of specialized physicians.

Methods: The study is designed in two parts. For the first part, 35 questions regarding acromegaly that patients frequently ask were identified, and these questions were asked to ChatGPT. In the second part, four patient examples were presented to ChatGPT using medical terminology. Three experts evaluated ChatGPT's answers to the questions and approaches in case management using 7-point scales in terms of safety, reliability, correctness, and usability.

Results: When the ChatGPT answers to the patient's questions were evaluated, a mean score of 6.78 ± 0.55 was given for correctness and 6.69 ± 0.60 for reliability. The mean scores given by the raters for correctness, safety and usability in the evaluation of the cases were as follows: 6.33 ± 0.88, 6.16 ± 0. 71 and 6.08 ± 0.79 points for case 1; 5.35 ± 1.88, 5.29 ± 1.80 and 5.20 ± 1.86 points for case 2; 6.08 ± 0.97, 6.00 ± 0.93 and 5.91 ± 0.82 points for case 3; 6.10 ± 1.29, 6.13 ± 1.30 and 6.16 ± 1.14 points for case 4.

Conclusion: ChatGPT can actively answer the questions of acromegaly patients. Although it is not a reliable source alone in managing patients with acromegaly, it can be a supportive tool for physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Therapeutic patient education and treatment intensification of diabetes and hypertension in subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal study. Correction: Timing of the repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: does early repeat biopsy change the rate of nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance cytology result? Hematological toxicities with Lutathera® for neuroendocrine neoplasms: post-marketing surveillance data from the US-FDA. SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce non-small cell lung cancer and not increase various neoplasms including several skin cancers. Clarification on the role of thyroid scintigraphy in the era of TIRADS: a response to Trimboli et al. (2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1