为更好地评估如何应对丧亲之痛而努力:应对丧亲之痛问卷对不同经历的适用性和概念结构。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2024.2420875
Camille Boever, Emmanuelle Zech, Jacques Cherblanc
{"title":"为更好地评估如何应对丧亲之痛而努力:应对丧亲之痛问卷对不同经历的适用性和概念结构。","authors":"Camille Boever, Emmanuelle Zech, Jacques Cherblanc","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2024.2420875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coping strategies are key adjustable elements mediating the relationship between risk factors and grief outcomes. It is essential to assess coping correctly. Scales based on the <i>Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement</i> have tended to confuse coping strategies and symptoms. The <i>Coping with Bereavement Questionnaire</i> was created to address such shortcomings. This article uses two datasets from Belgian studies to assess the applicability of the items as well as the factor structure of the scale. Logistic regressions revealed nine items as less applicable to a more diverse bereaved sample than people who lost their intimate partner, leading to their exclusion. Factor analyses revealed and confirmed a three-factor structure of coping strategies describing the bereaved's efforts to (1) accept the death and look to the future, (2) avoid thoughts and feelings, and (3) maintain the bond with the deceased. Theoretical issues related to the DPM are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a better assessment of coping with bereavement: Applicability to diverse experiences and conceptual structure of the <i>coping with bereavement questionnaire</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Boever, Emmanuelle Zech, Jacques Cherblanc\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07481187.2024.2420875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coping strategies are key adjustable elements mediating the relationship between risk factors and grief outcomes. It is essential to assess coping correctly. Scales based on the <i>Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement</i> have tended to confuse coping strategies and symptoms. The <i>Coping with Bereavement Questionnaire</i> was created to address such shortcomings. This article uses two datasets from Belgian studies to assess the applicability of the items as well as the factor structure of the scale. Logistic regressions revealed nine items as less applicable to a more diverse bereaved sample than people who lost their intimate partner, leading to their exclusion. Factor analyses revealed and confirmed a three-factor structure of coping strategies describing the bereaved's efforts to (1) accept the death and look to the future, (2) avoid thoughts and feelings, and (3) maintain the bond with the deceased. Theoretical issues related to the DPM are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Death Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Death Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2420875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2420875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对策略是调节风险因素与悲伤结果之间关系的关键因素。正确评估应对策略至关重要。以应对丧亲之痛的双重过程模型为基础的量表往往会混淆应对策略和症状。应对丧亲之痛问卷就是为了解决这些问题而设计的。本文利用比利时研究的两个数据集来评估项目的适用性以及量表的因子结构。逻辑回归显示,与失去亲密伴侣的人相比,有九个项目不太适用于更多样化的丧亲样本,因此被排除在外。因子分析显示并确认了应对策略的三因子结构,该结构描述了丧亲者在以下方面所做的努力:(1)接受死亡并展望未来;(2)回避想法和感受;(3)保持与逝者的联系。本文讨论了与 DPM 相关的理论问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a better assessment of coping with bereavement: Applicability to diverse experiences and conceptual structure of the coping with bereavement questionnaire.

Coping strategies are key adjustable elements mediating the relationship between risk factors and grief outcomes. It is essential to assess coping correctly. Scales based on the Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement have tended to confuse coping strategies and symptoms. The Coping with Bereavement Questionnaire was created to address such shortcomings. This article uses two datasets from Belgian studies to assess the applicability of the items as well as the factor structure of the scale. Logistic regressions revealed nine items as less applicable to a more diverse bereaved sample than people who lost their intimate partner, leading to their exclusion. Factor analyses revealed and confirmed a three-factor structure of coping strategies describing the bereaved's efforts to (1) accept the death and look to the future, (2) avoid thoughts and feelings, and (3) maintain the bond with the deceased. Theoretical issues related to the DPM are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Perinatal death, collective action and legislation against obstetric violence in Argentina. Barriers and solutions to equitable funeral care in the U.S. for the LGBTQIA+ community. Correction. Experiences of maternal-fetal medicine specialists conducting feticide. Network analysis of prolonged grief disorder and anxiety symptoms among bereaved Chinese parents who lost their only child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1