合法 "文本和数据挖掘文献综述。

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18013.2
Giorgos Vrakas
{"title":"合法 \"文本和数据挖掘文献综述。","authors":"Giorgos Vrakas","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.18013.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Text and data mining (TDM) is a process, typically automated, that looks for patterns in data that may otherwise remain unnoticed. In a world where data driven solutions play a progressively more important role, TDM has become a vital tool in sectors ranging from medicine, to commerce, gaining widespread attraction. Nevertheless, a variety of regulatory frameworks not always specifically attuned towards regulating TDM continue to apply concurrently. The literature within the context of regulatory frameworks governing TDM is a fragmented piecemeal of valuable insights into what \"lawful\" TDM resembles. This literature review adopts a grounded theory approach analysing 88 pieces of literature, collating views regarding \"lawful\" TDM, ultimately providing a holistic assessment of academics' and practitioners' views and opinions regarding the regulatory framework which governs TDM. A total of 7 categories were identified and each of these are analysed. Tables are provided in the Appendix (accessible here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12654691)highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used. It is ultimately concluded that the regulatory frameworks that apply to users conducting TDM are multifaceted, and ever-changing on a case-by-case basis. There is an ever-growing need for a holistic interpretation of the regulatory frameworks which apply, creating a map which would allow for users conducting TDM to navigate this complex web of legal rules.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A literature review of \\\"lawful\\\" text and data mining.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgos Vrakas\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.18013.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Text and data mining (TDM) is a process, typically automated, that looks for patterns in data that may otherwise remain unnoticed. In a world where data driven solutions play a progressively more important role, TDM has become a vital tool in sectors ranging from medicine, to commerce, gaining widespread attraction. Nevertheless, a variety of regulatory frameworks not always specifically attuned towards regulating TDM continue to apply concurrently. The literature within the context of regulatory frameworks governing TDM is a fragmented piecemeal of valuable insights into what \\\"lawful\\\" TDM resembles. This literature review adopts a grounded theory approach analysing 88 pieces of literature, collating views regarding \\\"lawful\\\" TDM, ultimately providing a holistic assessment of academics' and practitioners' views and opinions regarding the regulatory framework which governs TDM. A total of 7 categories were identified and each of these are analysed. Tables are provided in the Appendix (accessible here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12654691)highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used. It is ultimately concluded that the regulatory frameworks that apply to users conducting TDM are multifaceted, and ever-changing on a case-by-case basis. There is an ever-growing need for a holistic interpretation of the regulatory frameworks which apply, creating a map which would allow for users conducting TDM to navigate this complex web of legal rules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18013.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18013.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文本和数据挖掘(TDM)是一种通常是自动化的过程,它可以从数据中寻找可能不会被注意到的模式。在数据驱动的解决方案扮演着越来越重要的角色的今天,文本和数据挖掘已成为从医学到商业等各个领域的重要工具,获得了广泛的吸引力。然而,并不总是专门针对 TDM 的各种监管框架仍在同时适用。有关技术性需求管理监管框架的文献支离破碎,其中不乏对 "合法 "技术性需求管理的宝贵见解。本文献综述采用基础理论方法,分析了 88 篇文献,整理了有关 "合法 "技术需求管理的观点,最终对学者和从业人员有关技术需求管理监管框架的观点和意见进行了整体评估。共确定了 7 个类别,并对每个类别进行了分析。附录中提供了表格(可在此访问:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12654691),重点说明了文献综述的每个部分使用了哪些学术著作,以及如何使用这些著作。最终得出的结论是,适用于开展技术需求管理的用户的监管框架是多方面的,并根据具体情况不断变化。人们越来越需要对适用的监管框架进行整体解释,从而绘制出一张地图,让进行技术需求管理的用户能够驾驭这张复杂的法律规则之网。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A literature review of "lawful" text and data mining.

Text and data mining (TDM) is a process, typically automated, that looks for patterns in data that may otherwise remain unnoticed. In a world where data driven solutions play a progressively more important role, TDM has become a vital tool in sectors ranging from medicine, to commerce, gaining widespread attraction. Nevertheless, a variety of regulatory frameworks not always specifically attuned towards regulating TDM continue to apply concurrently. The literature within the context of regulatory frameworks governing TDM is a fragmented piecemeal of valuable insights into what "lawful" TDM resembles. This literature review adopts a grounded theory approach analysing 88 pieces of literature, collating views regarding "lawful" TDM, ultimately providing a holistic assessment of academics' and practitioners' views and opinions regarding the regulatory framework which governs TDM. A total of 7 categories were identified and each of these are analysed. Tables are provided in the Appendix (accessible here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12654691)highlighting which scholarly works were used for each section of the literature review, but also how those works were used. It is ultimately concluded that the regulatory frameworks that apply to users conducting TDM are multifaceted, and ever-changing on a case-by-case basis. There is an ever-growing need for a holistic interpretation of the regulatory frameworks which apply, creating a map which would allow for users conducting TDM to navigate this complex web of legal rules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-designing ab initio electronic structure methods on a RISC-V vector architecture. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Unveiling Maternal Health Dynamics from Pregnancy Through Postpartum Perspectives. Antibiotics in honey: a comprehensive review on occurrence and analytical methodologies. Challenges to ethical public engagement in research funding: a perspective from practice. Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1