三维生物打印应用中组织特异性生物墨水设计的工程考虑因素。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS Biomaterials Science Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1039/d4bm01192a
Shivi Tripathi, Madhusmita Dash, Ruchira Chakraborty, Harri Junaedi Lukman, Prasoon Kumar, Shabir Hassan, Hassan Mehboob, Harpreet Singh, Himansu Sekhar Nanda
{"title":"三维生物打印应用中组织特异性生物墨水设计的工程考虑因素。","authors":"Shivi Tripathi, Madhusmita Dash, Ruchira Chakraborty, Harri Junaedi Lukman, Prasoon Kumar, Shabir Hassan, Hassan Mehboob, Harpreet Singh, Himansu Sekhar Nanda","doi":"10.1039/d4bm01192a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.</p>","PeriodicalId":65,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications.\",\"authors\":\"Shivi Tripathi, Madhusmita Dash, Ruchira Chakraborty, Harri Junaedi Lukman, Prasoon Kumar, Shabir Hassan, Hassan Mehboob, Harpreet Singh, Himansu Sekhar Nanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4bm01192a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4bm01192a\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4bm01192a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,每年有 800 多万例外科手术是为了解决器官衰竭或组织缺失问题。为了满足这一迫切需求,最近的医学进步显著改善了患者的治疗效果,主要是通过利用组织移植技术进行创新性重建手术。尽管付出了巨大努力,修复受损组织仍然是生物工程师和临床医生面临的一大临床挑战。三维生物打印是一种增材制造技术,有望制造出复杂精细的组织结构,从而缩小工程组织和实际组织结构之间的差距。与非生物打印相比,三维生物打印引入了更多复杂因素,包括材料选择、细胞类型、生长和分化因子等方面的考虑。然而,技术上的挑战也随之而来,特别是生物墨水中用于组织构建的活细胞的微妙性质,以及在如此复杂的生物力学环境中对细胞命运过程的有限了解。生物墨水必须具有适当的粘弹性和流变学特性,以模拟原生组织的微环境并获得理想的生物力学特性。因此,生物墨水的特性对三维生物打印替代品的成功起着至关重要的作用。本综述全面探讨了以组织为中心或组织特异性生物墨水的科学方面,并揭示了当前生物墨水和生物打印转化所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engineering considerations in the design of tissue specific bioink for 3D bioprinting applications.

Over eight million surgical procedures are conducted annually in the United Stats to address organ failure or tissue losses. In response to this pressing need, recent medical advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes, primarily through innovative reconstructive surgeries utilizing tissue grafting techniques. Despite tremendous efforts, repairing damaged tissues remains a major clinical challenge for bioengineers and clinicians. 3D bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that holds significant promise for creating intricately detailed constructs of tissues, thereby bridging the gap between engineered and actual tissue constructs. In contrast to non-biological printing, 3D bioprinting introduces added intricacies, including considerations for material selection, cell types, growth, and differentiation factors. However, technical challenges arise, particularly concerning the delicate nature of living cells in bioink for tissue construction and limited knowledge about the cell fate processes in such a complex biomechanical environment. A bioink must have appropriate viscoelastic and rheological properties to mimic the native tissue microenvironment and attain desired biomechanical properties. Hence, the properties of bioink play a vital role in the success of 3D bioprinted substitutes. This review comprehensively delves into the scientific aspects of tissue-centric or tissue-specific bioinks and sheds light on the current challenges of the translation of bioinks and bioprinting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomaterials Science
Biomaterials Science MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
556
期刊介绍: Biomaterials Science is an international high impact journal exploring the science of biomaterials and their translation towards clinical use. Its scope encompasses new concepts in biomaterials design, studies into the interaction of biomaterials with the body, and the use of materials to answer fundamental biological questions.
期刊最新文献
Trends in protein derived materials for wound care applications. Back cover Adhesive silk fibroin/magnesium composite films and their application for removable wound dressing. Cholesterol- and ssDNA-binding fusion protein-mediated DNA tethering on the plasma membrane. Correction: Bioactivity of cerium dioxide nanoparticles as a function of size and surface features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1