美沙酮轮换新方法与其他常用方法的比较。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-005147
Elaine Cunningham, Nicole DiBiagio, Florry O' Connell, Maedhbh Flannery, Michael Cronin, Marie Murphy, Mary Jane O'Leary, Fiona Kiely, Aoife C Lowney
{"title":"美沙酮轮换新方法与其他常用方法的比较。","authors":"Elaine Cunningham, Nicole DiBiagio, Florry O' Connell, Maedhbh Flannery, Michael Cronin, Marie Murphy, Mary Jane O'Leary, Fiona Kiely, Aoife C Lowney","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare a novel method of methadone rotation used in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit (SPCU) in Cork, Ireland, with rapid titration methods using Perth and Brisbane Protocols as well as the Edmonton method of methadone rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed in March-June 2022. All patients who completed rotation to methadone during 2018-2019 in the SPCU were included. 2018-2019 was selected to study a population not affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Oral morphine equivalent (OME) was calculated using the opioid conversion chart. From the OME, the expected daily methadone dose was calculated using the Perth, Brisbane and Edmonton methods. These figures were then compared directly with the actual methadone doses achieved using our dosing schedule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of the expected doses using the Perth and Brisbane rapid titration protocols and stable daily dose achieved revealed that the stable methadone dose was significantly lower than both rapid titration protocols (p=<0.0001) and (p=0.0035, respectively). However, a comparison of the expected dose using the Edmonton method and the dose achieved did not determine any significant difference (p=0.7602).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first evaluation of a novel Irish method of methadone rotation and demonstrates a lower overall daily methadone dose compared with established protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Cunningham, Nicole DiBiagio, Florry O' Connell, Maedhbh Flannery, Michael Cronin, Marie Murphy, Mary Jane O'Leary, Fiona Kiely, Aoife C Lowney\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2024-005147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare a novel method of methadone rotation used in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit (SPCU) in Cork, Ireland, with rapid titration methods using Perth and Brisbane Protocols as well as the Edmonton method of methadone rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed in March-June 2022. All patients who completed rotation to methadone during 2018-2019 in the SPCU were included. 2018-2019 was selected to study a population not affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Oral morphine equivalent (OME) was calculated using the opioid conversion chart. From the OME, the expected daily methadone dose was calculated using the Perth, Brisbane and Edmonton methods. These figures were then compared directly with the actual methadone doses achieved using our dosing schedule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of the expected doses using the Perth and Brisbane rapid titration protocols and stable daily dose achieved revealed that the stable methadone dose was significantly lower than both rapid titration protocols (p=<0.0001) and (p=0.0035, respectively). However, a comparison of the expected dose using the Edmonton method and the dose achieved did not determine any significant difference (p=0.7602).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first evaluation of a novel Irish method of methadone rotation and demonstrates a lower overall daily methadone dose compared with established protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较爱尔兰科克姑息治疗专科住院病房(SPCU)使用的新型美沙酮轮换方法与使用珀斯和布里斯班协议的快速滴定方法以及埃德蒙顿美沙酮轮换方法:方法: 2022 年 3 月至 6 月进行了一次回顾性病历审查。纳入了所有在 2018-2019 年期间在 SPCU 完成美沙酮轮转的患者。选择2018-2019年是为了研究未受冠状病毒大流行影响的人群。口服吗啡当量(OME)使用阿片类药物换算表进行计算。根据口服吗啡当量,采用珀斯、布里斯班和埃德蒙顿方法计算出美沙酮的预期日剂量。然后,将这些数据与使用我们的给药计划所达到的美沙酮实际剂量进行直接比较:结果:将使用珀斯和布里斯班快速滴定方案计算出的预期剂量与获得的稳定日剂量进行比较后发现,稳定的美沙酮剂量明显低于两种快速滴定方案(p=结论:这是对爱尔兰美沙酮轮换新方法的首次评估,结果表明,与既定方案相比,美沙酮每日总剂量更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods.

Objectives: To compare a novel method of methadone rotation used in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit (SPCU) in Cork, Ireland, with rapid titration methods using Perth and Brisbane Protocols as well as the Edmonton method of methadone rotation.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed in March-June 2022. All patients who completed rotation to methadone during 2018-2019 in the SPCU were included. 2018-2019 was selected to study a population not affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Oral morphine equivalent (OME) was calculated using the opioid conversion chart. From the OME, the expected daily methadone dose was calculated using the Perth, Brisbane and Edmonton methods. These figures were then compared directly with the actual methadone doses achieved using our dosing schedule.

Results: A comparison of the expected doses using the Perth and Brisbane rapid titration protocols and stable daily dose achieved revealed that the stable methadone dose was significantly lower than both rapid titration protocols (p=<0.0001) and (p=0.0035, respectively). However, a comparison of the expected dose using the Edmonton method and the dose achieved did not determine any significant difference (p=0.7602).

Conclusions: This is the first evaluation of a novel Irish method of methadone rotation and demonstrates a lower overall daily methadone dose compared with established protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Caregiver burden and quality of life in palliative care: cross-sectional study. Comparison of a novel methadone rotation method with other commonly used methods. Gynaecologic oncology referrals to specialist palliative care in a tertiary referral centre: population, characteristics and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1