迷走神经刺激对双侧颞叶癫痫患者的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110138
Ashwaq Alshahrani , Jorge G. Burneo , David A. Steven , Michelle-Lee Jones , Keith W. MacDougall , Jonathan C. Lau , Derek B. Debicki , Tenielle Gofton , David C. Diosy , Richard S. McLachlan , Ana Suller Marti
{"title":"迷走神经刺激对双侧颞叶癫痫患者的影响。","authors":"Ashwaq Alshahrani ,&nbsp;Jorge G. Burneo ,&nbsp;David A. Steven ,&nbsp;Michelle-Lee Jones ,&nbsp;Keith W. MacDougall ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Lau ,&nbsp;Derek B. Debicki ,&nbsp;Tenielle Gofton ,&nbsp;David C. Diosy ,&nbsp;Richard S. McLachlan ,&nbsp;Ana Suller Marti","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on the seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (bi-TLE). Additionally, we aimed to determine the safety of VNS and its side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our retrospective study included 17 patients with bi-TLE who underwent VNS-device implantation at our center from 1997 to 2019. The main outcome was a reduction in seizure frequency. Bitemporal cases were confirmed using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or invasive electroencephalography (iEEG).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age at seizure onset was 18 years. Bi-TLE was confirmed by scalp EEG in 47 % and by iEEG in 53 % of the patients. The median follow-up period was 36 months. The median seizure frequency per month before and after VNS was 9.5 (IQR = 4.3–35.3) and 2 (IQR = 0.8–4.2), respectively. Compared to baseline, 70.5 % of the patients achieved ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency, whereas 35.3 % experienced either no or minimal reduction in seizure frequency. The response rate (&gt;50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was 87.5 % in patients who underwent scalp EEG and 55.5 % in those who underwent iEEG. For VNS treatment, the median follow-up was at 36 months (IQR = 17–46.5). Adverse effects were observed in 59 % of the patients, including cough and hoarseness.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Therapeutic choices are limited in cases of drug-resistant bi-TLE. Our study on VNS-device implantation in bi-TLE suggests a positive outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 110138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of vagal nerve stimulation on patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Ashwaq Alshahrani ,&nbsp;Jorge G. Burneo ,&nbsp;David A. Steven ,&nbsp;Michelle-Lee Jones ,&nbsp;Keith W. MacDougall ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Lau ,&nbsp;Derek B. Debicki ,&nbsp;Tenielle Gofton ,&nbsp;David C. Diosy ,&nbsp;Richard S. McLachlan ,&nbsp;Ana Suller Marti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on the seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (bi-TLE). Additionally, we aimed to determine the safety of VNS and its side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our retrospective study included 17 patients with bi-TLE who underwent VNS-device implantation at our center from 1997 to 2019. The main outcome was a reduction in seizure frequency. Bitemporal cases were confirmed using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or invasive electroencephalography (iEEG).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age at seizure onset was 18 years. Bi-TLE was confirmed by scalp EEG in 47 % and by iEEG in 53 % of the patients. The median follow-up period was 36 months. The median seizure frequency per month before and after VNS was 9.5 (IQR = 4.3–35.3) and 2 (IQR = 0.8–4.2), respectively. Compared to baseline, 70.5 % of the patients achieved ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency, whereas 35.3 % experienced either no or minimal reduction in seizure frequency. The response rate (&gt;50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was 87.5 % in patients who underwent scalp EEG and 55.5 % in those who underwent iEEG. For VNS treatment, the median follow-up was at 36 months (IQR = 17–46.5). Adverse effects were observed in 59 % of the patients, including cough and hoarseness.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Therapeutic choices are limited in cases of drug-resistant bi-TLE. Our study on VNS-device implantation in bi-TLE suggests a positive outcome.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024005201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024005201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究迷走神经刺激(VNS)对耐药性癫痫(DRE)和双侧颞叶癫痫(bi-TLE)患者癫痫发作频率的影响。此外,我们还旨在确定 VNS 的安全性及其副作用:我们的回顾性研究纳入了 1997 年至 2019 年期间在本中心接受 VNS 装置植入治疗的 17 名双颞叶癫痫患者。主要结果是癫痫发作频率降低。双时相病例通过头皮脑电图(EEG)或有创脑电图(iEEG)进行确诊:结果:癫痫发作的中位年龄为18岁。47%的患者经头皮脑电图确诊为双TLE,53%的患者经iEEG确诊为双TLE。随访时间中位数为 36 个月。VNS 治疗前后每月发作频率的中位数分别为 9.5 次(IQR = 4.3-35.3)和 2 次(IQR = 0.8-4.2)。与基线相比,70.5%的患者癫痫发作频率减少了≥50%,而35.3%的患者癫痫发作频率没有减少或减少极少。接受头皮脑电图检查的患者中,应答率(癫痫发作频率减少 >50%)为 87.5%,接受 iEEG 检查的患者中,应答率为 55.5%。VNS 治疗的中位随访时间为 36 个月(IQR = 17-46.5)。59%的患者出现了不良反应,包括咳嗽和声音嘶哑:讨论:耐药双TLE的治疗选择有限。讨论:对于耐药的双TLE病例,治疗选择非常有限。我们对双TLE植入VNS设备的研究显示了积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of vagal nerve stimulation on patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

Objective

To investigate the effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on the seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (bi-TLE). Additionally, we aimed to determine the safety of VNS and its side effects.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 17 patients with bi-TLE who underwent VNS-device implantation at our center from 1997 to 2019. The main outcome was a reduction in seizure frequency. Bitemporal cases were confirmed using scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or invasive electroencephalography (iEEG).

Results

The median age at seizure onset was 18 years. Bi-TLE was confirmed by scalp EEG in 47 % and by iEEG in 53 % of the patients. The median follow-up period was 36 months. The median seizure frequency per month before and after VNS was 9.5 (IQR = 4.3–35.3) and 2 (IQR = 0.8–4.2), respectively. Compared to baseline, 70.5 % of the patients achieved ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency, whereas 35.3 % experienced either no or minimal reduction in seizure frequency. The response rate (>50 % reduction in seizure frequency) was 87.5 % in patients who underwent scalp EEG and 55.5 % in those who underwent iEEG. For VNS treatment, the median follow-up was at 36 months (IQR = 17–46.5). Adverse effects were observed in 59 % of the patients, including cough and hoarseness.

Discussion

Therapeutic choices are limited in cases of drug-resistant bi-TLE. Our study on VNS-device implantation in bi-TLE suggests a positive outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Preparing adolescents and young adults with epilepsy for transitioning health care (PATH) study: The important role of age and self-efficacy Epilepsy surgery for postinfectious lesions: A review Adaptation of the Epilepsy-Related apathy scale to Turkish in adults with Epilepsy: Validity and reliability study A practical program for responding to epileptic seizures including buccal midazolam administration in schools: Effectiveness evaluation for Yogo teachers in Japan Combining three-phase EEG pattern and ipsilateral isolated eye deviation to predict seizure focus in the frontal interhemispheric fissure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1