创新性地区服务和异构通信渠道:德国全国大流行病管理 egePan 项目的成果。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12212192
Simon Kugai, Benjamin Aretz, Yelda Krumpholtz, Manuela Schmidt, Daniela Süssle, Linda Steyer, Adrienne Henkel, Katrin Bender, Felix Girrbach, Sebastian Stehr, Katrin Balzer, Birgitta Weltermann
{"title":"创新性地区服务和异构通信渠道:德国全国大流行病管理 egePan 项目的成果。","authors":"Simon Kugai, Benjamin Aretz, Yelda Krumpholtz, Manuela Schmidt, Daniela Süssle, Linda Steyer, Adrienne Henkel, Katrin Bender, Felix Girrbach, Sebastian Stehr, Katrin Balzer, Birgitta Weltermann","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12212192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: In the COVID-19 pandemic, novel regional services and communication channels emerged across all sectors of the German healthcare system. To contribute to pandemic preparedness, this study aims to describe newly established services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic from a stakeholder perspective and to examine the interprofessional communication channels, applying a nationwide cross-sectional approach. <b>Methods</b>: A nationwide sample of German healthcare stakeholders comprising general practitioners, associations of statutory health insurance physicians, hospital medical directors, local health departments, rescue coordination centres, medical directors of emergency services, outpatient nursing services, nursing homes, community care access centres, and hospital nursing managers was surveyed. A web-based questionnaire asked for their level of participation in newly implemented regional COVID-19 services and communication channels. Stakeholders' level of recommendation was measured using the Net Promotor Score (NPS), a metric that assesses their satisfaction towards the services surveyed. <b>Results</b>: In total, 1312 healthcare stakeholders participated in the survey. Diagnostic centres (23.0-90.9%), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (40.5-92.1%), emergency medical vehicles designated solely for COVID-19 patients (16.5-68.4%), and crisis intervention teams (11.6-30.6%) exhibited the highest rates of engagement. The services receiving the highest recommendation for future use were COVID-19 focus practices (NPS: 33.4-43.7), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (NPS: 47.6-84.4), transportation of COVID-19 patients exclusively by predefined professional groups (NPS: 12.5-36.4), and newly implemented digitally supported nursing services (NPS: 58.3-100.0). Telephones emerged as the most frequently used communication channel (58.0-96.7%), while email was the primary digital channel (23.7-81.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Germany experienced significant variation in the implementation of pandemic-related services across healthcare sectors, with stakeholders prioritising services built on existing healthcare structures. Developing a proactive digital infrastructure to connect healthcare professionals from different sectors is crucial for better future pandemic management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative Regional Services and Heterogeneous Communication Channels: Results from the Nationwide German egePan Project for Pandemic Management.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Kugai, Benjamin Aretz, Yelda Krumpholtz, Manuela Schmidt, Daniela Süssle, Linda Steyer, Adrienne Henkel, Katrin Bender, Felix Girrbach, Sebastian Stehr, Katrin Balzer, Birgitta Weltermann\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare12212192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: In the COVID-19 pandemic, novel regional services and communication channels emerged across all sectors of the German healthcare system. To contribute to pandemic preparedness, this study aims to describe newly established services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic from a stakeholder perspective and to examine the interprofessional communication channels, applying a nationwide cross-sectional approach. <b>Methods</b>: A nationwide sample of German healthcare stakeholders comprising general practitioners, associations of statutory health insurance physicians, hospital medical directors, local health departments, rescue coordination centres, medical directors of emergency services, outpatient nursing services, nursing homes, community care access centres, and hospital nursing managers was surveyed. A web-based questionnaire asked for their level of participation in newly implemented regional COVID-19 services and communication channels. Stakeholders' level of recommendation was measured using the Net Promotor Score (NPS), a metric that assesses their satisfaction towards the services surveyed. <b>Results</b>: In total, 1312 healthcare stakeholders participated in the survey. Diagnostic centres (23.0-90.9%), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (40.5-92.1%), emergency medical vehicles designated solely for COVID-19 patients (16.5-68.4%), and crisis intervention teams (11.6-30.6%) exhibited the highest rates of engagement. The services receiving the highest recommendation for future use were COVID-19 focus practices (NPS: 33.4-43.7), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (NPS: 47.6-84.4), transportation of COVID-19 patients exclusively by predefined professional groups (NPS: 12.5-36.4), and newly implemented digitally supported nursing services (NPS: 58.3-100.0). Telephones emerged as the most frequently used communication channel (58.0-96.7%), while email was the primary digital channel (23.7-81.5%). <b>Conclusions</b>: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Germany experienced significant variation in the implementation of pandemic-related services across healthcare sectors, with stakeholders prioritising services built on existing healthcare structures. Developing a proactive digital infrastructure to connect healthcare professionals from different sectors is crucial for better future pandemic management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国医疗保健系统的各个部门都出现了新的区域服务和沟通渠道。为了促进大流行病的准备工作,本研究旨在从利益相关者的角度描述为应对 COVID-19 大流行病而新设立的服务,并采用全国范围的横断面方法研究专业间的沟通渠道。研究方法在全国范围内抽样调查了德国的医疗保健利益相关者,包括全科医生、法定医疗保险医生协会、医院医务主任、地方卫生部门、救援协调中心、急救服务医务主任、门诊护理服务、疗养院、社区护理中心和医院护理经理。网络问卷调查了他们对新实施的地区 COVID-19 服务和沟通渠道的参与程度。利益相关者的推荐程度采用净推荐值(NPS)进行衡量,该指标可评估他们对所调查服务的满意度。结果共有 1312 名医疗利益相关者参与了调查。诊断中心(23.0-90.9%)、医院的 COVID-19 病房(40.5-92.1%)、专为 COVID-19 患者服务的急救车(16.5-68.4%)和危机干预小组(11.6-30.6%)的参与率最高。最值得推荐未来使用的服务是 COVID-19 重点实践(NPS:33.4-43.7)、医院中的 COVID-19 病房(NPS:47.6-84.4)、由预定专业团体专门运送 COVID-19 患者(NPS:12.5-36.4)以及新实施的数字支持护理服务(NPS:58.3-100.0)。电话是最常用的沟通渠道(58.0%-96.7%),而电子邮件则是主要的数字渠道(23.7%-81.5%)。结论在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国各医疗保健部门在实施与大流行相关的服务方面存在显著差异,利益相关者优先考虑建立在现有医疗保健结构基础上的服务。开发积极主动的数字基础设施,将不同部门的医疗保健专业人员联系起来,对于未来更好地管理大流行病至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Innovative Regional Services and Heterogeneous Communication Channels: Results from the Nationwide German egePan Project for Pandemic Management.

Background: In the COVID-19 pandemic, novel regional services and communication channels emerged across all sectors of the German healthcare system. To contribute to pandemic preparedness, this study aims to describe newly established services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic from a stakeholder perspective and to examine the interprofessional communication channels, applying a nationwide cross-sectional approach. Methods: A nationwide sample of German healthcare stakeholders comprising general practitioners, associations of statutory health insurance physicians, hospital medical directors, local health departments, rescue coordination centres, medical directors of emergency services, outpatient nursing services, nursing homes, community care access centres, and hospital nursing managers was surveyed. A web-based questionnaire asked for their level of participation in newly implemented regional COVID-19 services and communication channels. Stakeholders' level of recommendation was measured using the Net Promotor Score (NPS), a metric that assesses their satisfaction towards the services surveyed. Results: In total, 1312 healthcare stakeholders participated in the survey. Diagnostic centres (23.0-90.9%), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (40.5-92.1%), emergency medical vehicles designated solely for COVID-19 patients (16.5-68.4%), and crisis intervention teams (11.6-30.6%) exhibited the highest rates of engagement. The services receiving the highest recommendation for future use were COVID-19 focus practices (NPS: 33.4-43.7), COVID-19 wards in hospitals (NPS: 47.6-84.4), transportation of COVID-19 patients exclusively by predefined professional groups (NPS: 12.5-36.4), and newly implemented digitally supported nursing services (NPS: 58.3-100.0). Telephones emerged as the most frequently used communication channel (58.0-96.7%), while email was the primary digital channel (23.7-81.5%). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Germany experienced significant variation in the implementation of pandemic-related services across healthcare sectors, with stakeholders prioritising services built on existing healthcare structures. Developing a proactive digital infrastructure to connect healthcare professionals from different sectors is crucial for better future pandemic management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Alexithymia and Associated Factors Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of Periodontitis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Friday Night Live Mentoring Program on Supporting Positive Youth Development Outcomes. Analysis of Speech Features in Alzheimer's Disease with Machine Learning: A Case-Control Study. Mental Health Status of Patients Recovered from COVID-19 in Macau: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1